Cargando…

Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of polypropylene (PP) mesh for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has declined because of safety concerns. The aim of this study is to evaluate a biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL) mesh and a PCL composite mesh tissue engineered with human uterine fibrob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacCraith, E., Joyce, M., do Amaral, R. J. F. C., O’Brien, F. J., Davis, N. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35312806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05160-2
_version_ 1784760974426767360
author MacCraith, E.
Joyce, M.
do Amaral, R. J. F. C.
O’Brien, F. J.
Davis, N. F.
author_facet MacCraith, E.
Joyce, M.
do Amaral, R. J. F. C.
O’Brien, F. J.
Davis, N. F.
author_sort MacCraith, E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of polypropylene (PP) mesh for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has declined because of safety concerns. The aim of this study is to evaluate a biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL) mesh and a PCL composite mesh tissue engineered with human uterine fibroblasts (HUFs) for SUI surgery by comparing mechanical properties and in vitro biocompatibility to commercially available PP and porcine dermis (PD). METHODS: The mechanical properties of four scaffold materials were evaluated: PCL, PCL-collagen-hyaluronic acid composite, acellular porcine dermal collagen (PD) (Pelvicol™) and polypropylene (Gynecare TVT™ Exact®). HUFs were seeded on separate scaffolds. After 7 and 14 days scaffolds were assessed for metabolic activity and cell proliferation using Alamar Blue, Live/Dead and PicoGreen assays. Soluble collagen production was evaluated using a Sircol assay. RESULTS: PCL and the composite scaffold reached ultimate tensile strength (UTS) values closest to healthy pelvic floor tissue (PCL = 1.19 MPa; composite = 1.13 MPa; pelvic floor = 0.79 MPa; Lei et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 18(6):603-7, 2007). Cells on PCL showed significantly greater cell viability than PP at day 7 (p < 0.0001). At D14 the composite scaffold showed significantly greater cell viability than PP (p = 0.0006). PCL was the best performing scaffold for soluble collagen production at day 14 (106.1 μg versus 13.04 μg for PP, p = 0.0173). CONCLUSIONS: We have designed a biodegradable PCL mesh and a composite mesh which demonstrate better biocompatibility than PP and mechanical properties closer to that of healthy pelvic floor tissue. This in vitro study provides promising evidence that these two implants should be evaluated in animal and human trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9343266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93432662022-08-03 Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence MacCraith, E. Joyce, M. do Amaral, R. J. F. C. O’Brien, F. J. Davis, N. F. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of polypropylene (PP) mesh for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has declined because of safety concerns. The aim of this study is to evaluate a biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL) mesh and a PCL composite mesh tissue engineered with human uterine fibroblasts (HUFs) for SUI surgery by comparing mechanical properties and in vitro biocompatibility to commercially available PP and porcine dermis (PD). METHODS: The mechanical properties of four scaffold materials were evaluated: PCL, PCL-collagen-hyaluronic acid composite, acellular porcine dermal collagen (PD) (Pelvicol™) and polypropylene (Gynecare TVT™ Exact®). HUFs were seeded on separate scaffolds. After 7 and 14 days scaffolds were assessed for metabolic activity and cell proliferation using Alamar Blue, Live/Dead and PicoGreen assays. Soluble collagen production was evaluated using a Sircol assay. RESULTS: PCL and the composite scaffold reached ultimate tensile strength (UTS) values closest to healthy pelvic floor tissue (PCL = 1.19 MPa; composite = 1.13 MPa; pelvic floor = 0.79 MPa; Lei et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 18(6):603-7, 2007). Cells on PCL showed significantly greater cell viability than PP at day 7 (p < 0.0001). At D14 the composite scaffold showed significantly greater cell viability than PP (p = 0.0006). PCL was the best performing scaffold for soluble collagen production at day 14 (106.1 μg versus 13.04 μg for PP, p = 0.0173). CONCLUSIONS: We have designed a biodegradable PCL mesh and a composite mesh which demonstrate better biocompatibility than PP and mechanical properties closer to that of healthy pelvic floor tissue. This in vitro study provides promising evidence that these two implants should be evaluated in animal and human trials. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9343266/ /pubmed/35312806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05160-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
MacCraith, E.
Joyce, M.
do Amaral, R. J. F. C.
O’Brien, F. J.
Davis, N. F.
Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
title Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
title_full Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
title_fullStr Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
title_short Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
title_sort development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35312806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05160-2
work_keys_str_mv AT maccraithe developmentandinvitroinvestigationofabiodegradablemeshforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinence
AT joycem developmentandinvitroinvestigationofabiodegradablemeshforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinence
AT doamaralrjfc developmentandinvitroinvestigationofabiodegradablemeshforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinence
AT obrienfj developmentandinvitroinvestigationofabiodegradablemeshforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinence
AT davisnf developmentandinvitroinvestigationofabiodegradablemeshforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinence