Cargando…

MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Structured reporting of MRI examinations using consensus-based content categories has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication in neuro-oncology. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the essential reporting categories in the imaging of gliomas f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huckhagel, Torge, Riedel, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-022-01014-6
_version_ 1784760983976148992
author Huckhagel, Torge
Riedel, Christian
author_facet Huckhagel, Torge
Riedel, Christian
author_sort Huckhagel, Torge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Structured reporting of MRI examinations using consensus-based content categories has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication in neuro-oncology. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the essential reporting categories in the imaging of gliomas from a clinical perspective within the setting of a nationwide survey of members of medical societies working in neuro-oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was created based on an interdisciplinary developed catalog of possible MRI reporting elements. Subsequently, specialist members of the German Societies of Neurosurgery, Radiation Oncology, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Neurology, and Neuropathology were invited to evaluate the items with regard to their clinical relevance. RESULTS: A total of 171 specialists from Germany participated in the survey (81 neurosurgeons, 66 radiation therapists, and 24 other neuro-oncology experts). Number and anatomic extent of tumors in the contrast-enhanced T1 and 2D T2 sequences (98.8% vs. 97.1%) as well as newly diagnosed lesions at follow-up (T1 + contrast 98.2%; T2 94.7%) were overall most frequently considered crucial. In addition, the experts particularly rated the description of ependymal and/or leptomeningeal tumor dissemination (93.6%) and signs of mass effect including occlusive hydrocephalus and parenchymal mass shifts (> 75.0% each) as essential. Standard mention of intratumoral calcifications, hemorrhages, tumor vascular architecture, or advanced imaging modalities such as MR perfusion, diffusion, tractography, and proton spectroscopy were considered fundamental to their everyday practice by only a minority of neuro-oncology colleagues. CONCLUSION: A referring physician-oriented minimum content standard for MRI examinations in primary brain tumor patients should include as clinically relevant core elements the exact anatomic spread of the lesion(s), including ependymal and meningeal involvement, and the pertinent signs of mass effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9343312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93433122022-08-03 MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten Huckhagel, Torge Riedel, Christian Radiologie (Heidelb) Originalien BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Structured reporting of MRI examinations using consensus-based content categories has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication in neuro-oncology. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the essential reporting categories in the imaging of gliomas from a clinical perspective within the setting of a nationwide survey of members of medical societies working in neuro-oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was created based on an interdisciplinary developed catalog of possible MRI reporting elements. Subsequently, specialist members of the German Societies of Neurosurgery, Radiation Oncology, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Neurology, and Neuropathology were invited to evaluate the items with regard to their clinical relevance. RESULTS: A total of 171 specialists from Germany participated in the survey (81 neurosurgeons, 66 radiation therapists, and 24 other neuro-oncology experts). Number and anatomic extent of tumors in the contrast-enhanced T1 and 2D T2 sequences (98.8% vs. 97.1%) as well as newly diagnosed lesions at follow-up (T1 + contrast 98.2%; T2 94.7%) were overall most frequently considered crucial. In addition, the experts particularly rated the description of ependymal and/or leptomeningeal tumor dissemination (93.6%) and signs of mass effect including occlusive hydrocephalus and parenchymal mass shifts (> 75.0% each) as essential. Standard mention of intratumoral calcifications, hemorrhages, tumor vascular architecture, or advanced imaging modalities such as MR perfusion, diffusion, tractography, and proton spectroscopy were considered fundamental to their everyday practice by only a minority of neuro-oncology colleagues. CONCLUSION: A referring physician-oriented minimum content standard for MRI examinations in primary brain tumor patients should include as clinically relevant core elements the exact anatomic spread of the lesion(s), including ependymal and meningeal involvement, and the pertinent signs of mass effect. Springer Medizin 2022-05-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9343312/ /pubmed/35913575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-022-01014-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Huckhagel, Torge
Riedel, Christian
MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten
title MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten
title_full MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten
title_fullStr MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten
title_full_unstemmed MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten
title_short MRT-Befundung hirneigener Tumoren: Was neuroonkologisch tätige Kliniker vom Radiologen erwarten
title_sort mrt-befundung hirneigener tumoren: was neuroonkologisch tätige kliniker vom radiologen erwarten
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-022-01014-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huckhageltorge mrtbefundunghirneigenertumorenwasneuroonkologischtatigeklinikervomradiologenerwarten
AT riedelchristian mrtbefundunghirneigenertumorenwasneuroonkologischtatigeklinikervomradiologenerwarten