Cargando…

Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact?

INTRODUCTION: The use of rapid molecular testing for influenza diagnosis is becoming increasingly popular. Used at the point of care or in a clinical laboratory, these tests detect influenza A and B viruses, though many do not distinguish between influenza A subtypes. The UK Severe Influenza Surveil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boddington, Nicki L., Elgohari, Suzanne, Ellis, Joanna, Donati, Matthew, Zambon, Maria, Pebody, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.13001
_version_ 1784760988923330560
author Boddington, Nicki L.
Elgohari, Suzanne
Ellis, Joanna
Donati, Matthew
Zambon, Maria
Pebody, Richard G.
author_facet Boddington, Nicki L.
Elgohari, Suzanne
Ellis, Joanna
Donati, Matthew
Zambon, Maria
Pebody, Richard G.
author_sort Boddington, Nicki L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of rapid molecular testing for influenza diagnosis is becoming increasingly popular. Used at the point of care or in a clinical laboratory, these tests detect influenza A and B viruses, though many do not distinguish between influenza A subtypes. The UK Severe Influenza Surveillance System (USISS) collects surveillance data on laboratory‐confirmed influenza admissions to secondary care in England. This study set out to understand how rapid influenza molecular testing was being used and how it might influence the availability of subtyping data collected on influenza cases admitted to secondary care in England. METHODS: At the end of the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 influenza seasons, a questionnaire was sent to all National Health Service Hospital Trusts in England to evaluate the use of rapid influenza testing. Surveillance data collected through USISS was analysed from 2011/2012 to 2020/2021. RESULTS: Of responding trusts, 42% (13/31) in 2017/2018 and 55% (9/17) in 2018/2019 used rapid influenza molecular tests, either alone or in combination with other testing. The majority of rapid tests used did not subtype the influenza A result, and limited follow‐up testing occurred. Surveillance data showed significant proportions of influenza A hospital and intensive care unit/high dependency unit admissions without subtyping information, increasing by approximately 35% between 2012/2013 and 2020/2021. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rapid influenza molecular tests is a likely contributing factor to the large proportion of influenza A hospitalisations in England that were unsubtyped. Given their clear clinical advantages, further work must be done to reinforce these data for public health through integrated genomic surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9343334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93433342022-09-01 Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact? Boddington, Nicki L. Elgohari, Suzanne Ellis, Joanna Donati, Matthew Zambon, Maria Pebody, Richard G. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The use of rapid molecular testing for influenza diagnosis is becoming increasingly popular. Used at the point of care or in a clinical laboratory, these tests detect influenza A and B viruses, though many do not distinguish between influenza A subtypes. The UK Severe Influenza Surveillance System (USISS) collects surveillance data on laboratory‐confirmed influenza admissions to secondary care in England. This study set out to understand how rapid influenza molecular testing was being used and how it might influence the availability of subtyping data collected on influenza cases admitted to secondary care in England. METHODS: At the end of the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 influenza seasons, a questionnaire was sent to all National Health Service Hospital Trusts in England to evaluate the use of rapid influenza testing. Surveillance data collected through USISS was analysed from 2011/2012 to 2020/2021. RESULTS: Of responding trusts, 42% (13/31) in 2017/2018 and 55% (9/17) in 2018/2019 used rapid influenza molecular tests, either alone or in combination with other testing. The majority of rapid tests used did not subtype the influenza A result, and limited follow‐up testing occurred. Surveillance data showed significant proportions of influenza A hospital and intensive care unit/high dependency unit admissions without subtyping information, increasing by approximately 35% between 2012/2013 and 2020/2021. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rapid influenza molecular tests is a likely contributing factor to the large proportion of influenza A hospitalisations in England that were unsubtyped. Given their clear clinical advantages, further work must be done to reinforce these data for public health through integrated genomic surveillance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-18 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9343334/ /pubmed/35585686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.13001 Text en © 2022 Crown copyright. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Boddington, Nicki L.
Elgohari, Suzanne
Ellis, Joanna
Donati, Matthew
Zambon, Maria
Pebody, Richard G.
Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact?
title Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact?
title_full Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact?
title_fullStr Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact?
title_full_unstemmed Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact?
title_short Rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in England: Any impact?
title_sort rapid influenza molecular testing in secondary care and influenza surveillance in england: any impact?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.13001
work_keys_str_mv AT boddingtonnickil rapidinfluenzamoleculartestinginsecondarycareandinfluenzasurveillanceinenglandanyimpact
AT elgoharisuzanne rapidinfluenzamoleculartestinginsecondarycareandinfluenzasurveillanceinenglandanyimpact
AT ellisjoanna rapidinfluenzamoleculartestinginsecondarycareandinfluenzasurveillanceinenglandanyimpact
AT donatimatthew rapidinfluenzamoleculartestinginsecondarycareandinfluenzasurveillanceinenglandanyimpact
AT zambonmaria rapidinfluenzamoleculartestinginsecondarycareandinfluenzasurveillanceinenglandanyimpact
AT pebodyrichardg rapidinfluenzamoleculartestinginsecondarycareandinfluenzasurveillanceinenglandanyimpact