Cargando…

Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as recurrent or continuous pain in the lower abdomen or pelvis, either non-menstrual or noncyclical, lasting for at least 6 months. There is strong evidence that up to 85% of patients with CPP have serious dysfunctions of the musculoskeletal system, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baltazar, Maria Carolina Dalla Vecchia, Russo, Jéssica Aparecida de Oliveira, De Lucca, Victória, Mitidieri, Andréia Moreira de Souza, da Silva, Ana Paula Moreira, Gurian, Maria Beatriz Ferreira, Poli-Neto, Omero Benedicto, Rosa-e-Silva, Júlio César
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01910-y
_version_ 1784761018982858752
author Baltazar, Maria Carolina Dalla Vecchia
Russo, Jéssica Aparecida de Oliveira
De Lucca, Victória
Mitidieri, Andréia Moreira de Souza
da Silva, Ana Paula Moreira
Gurian, Maria Beatriz Ferreira
Poli-Neto, Omero Benedicto
Rosa-e-Silva, Júlio César
author_facet Baltazar, Maria Carolina Dalla Vecchia
Russo, Jéssica Aparecida de Oliveira
De Lucca, Victória
Mitidieri, Andréia Moreira de Souza
da Silva, Ana Paula Moreira
Gurian, Maria Beatriz Ferreira
Poli-Neto, Omero Benedicto
Rosa-e-Silva, Júlio César
author_sort Baltazar, Maria Carolina Dalla Vecchia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as recurrent or continuous pain in the lower abdomen or pelvis, either non-menstrual or noncyclical, lasting for at least 6 months. There is strong evidence that up to 85% of patients with CPP have serious dysfunctions of the musculoskeletal system, including abdominal myofascial pain syndrome (AMPS). AMPS is characterized by intense and deep abdominal pain, originating from hyperirritable trigger points, usually located within a musculoskeletal band or its lining fascia. In the literature, there are few studies that address AMPS. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) and injection of local anesthetic (IA) to improve pain in women with abdominal myofascial syndrome secondary to CPP. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary University Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted, patients were allocated to two types of treatment: group TUS (n = 18), and group IA (n = 20). The instruments used for evaluation and reassessment were the Visual Analog Scale, Numerical Categorical Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and SF-36 quality of life assessment questionnaire. They were evaluated before starting treatment, 1 week after the end of treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: TUS and IA were effective in reducing clinical pain and improving quality of life through the variables analyzed among study participants. There was no significant difference between groups. Limitations: absence of blinding; exclusion of women with comorbidities and other causes of CPP, the absence of a placebo group, the difference between the number of sessions used for each technique, and the COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Treatment with TUS and IA were effective in reducing clinical pain and improving quality of life in women with AMPS secondary to CPP. TRAIL REGISTRATION: We declare that this clinical trial has been registered under the number [(ReBEC) no. RBR-39czsv] on 07/18/2018 in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9343571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93435712022-08-02 Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial Baltazar, Maria Carolina Dalla Vecchia Russo, Jéssica Aparecida de Oliveira De Lucca, Victória Mitidieri, Andréia Moreira de Souza da Silva, Ana Paula Moreira Gurian, Maria Beatriz Ferreira Poli-Neto, Omero Benedicto Rosa-e-Silva, Júlio César BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as recurrent or continuous pain in the lower abdomen or pelvis, either non-menstrual or noncyclical, lasting for at least 6 months. There is strong evidence that up to 85% of patients with CPP have serious dysfunctions of the musculoskeletal system, including abdominal myofascial pain syndrome (AMPS). AMPS is characterized by intense and deep abdominal pain, originating from hyperirritable trigger points, usually located within a musculoskeletal band or its lining fascia. In the literature, there are few studies that address AMPS. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) and injection of local anesthetic (IA) to improve pain in women with abdominal myofascial syndrome secondary to CPP. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary University Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted, patients were allocated to two types of treatment: group TUS (n = 18), and group IA (n = 20). The instruments used for evaluation and reassessment were the Visual Analog Scale, Numerical Categorical Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and SF-36 quality of life assessment questionnaire. They were evaluated before starting treatment, 1 week after the end of treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: TUS and IA were effective in reducing clinical pain and improving quality of life through the variables analyzed among study participants. There was no significant difference between groups. Limitations: absence of blinding; exclusion of women with comorbidities and other causes of CPP, the absence of a placebo group, the difference between the number of sessions used for each technique, and the COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Treatment with TUS and IA were effective in reducing clinical pain and improving quality of life in women with AMPS secondary to CPP. TRAIL REGISTRATION: We declare that this clinical trial has been registered under the number [(ReBEC) no. RBR-39czsv] on 07/18/2018 in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials. BioMed Central 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9343571/ /pubmed/35918696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01910-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Baltazar, Maria Carolina Dalla Vecchia
Russo, Jéssica Aparecida de Oliveira
De Lucca, Victória
Mitidieri, Andréia Moreira de Souza
da Silva, Ana Paula Moreira
Gurian, Maria Beatriz Ferreira
Poli-Neto, Omero Benedicto
Rosa-e-Silva, Júlio César
Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
title Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01910-y
work_keys_str_mv AT baltazarmariacarolinadallavecchia therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT russojessicaaparecidadeoliveira therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT deluccavictoria therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mitidieriandreiamoreiradesouza therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dasilvaanapaulamoreira therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gurianmariabeatrizferreira therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT polinetoomerobenedicto therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rosaesilvajuliocesar therapeuticultrasoundversusinjectionoflocalanestheticinthetreatmentofwomenwithchronicpelvicpainsecondarytoabdominalmyofascialsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial