Cargando…

The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION: A variety of biomarkers are considered for diagnosis (e.g., β2-microgobulin, albumin, or LDH) and prognosis [e.g., cytogenetic aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] of multiple myeloma (MM). More recently, clonal evolution has been established as key. Littl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandmann, Sarah, Karsch, Katharina, Bartel, Peter, Exeler, Rita, Brix, Tobias J., Mai, Elias K., Varghese, Julian, Lenz, Georg, Khandanpour, Cyrus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.919278
_version_ 1784761029126782976
author Sandmann, Sarah
Karsch, Katharina
Bartel, Peter
Exeler, Rita
Brix, Tobias J.
Mai, Elias K.
Varghese, Julian
Lenz, Georg
Khandanpour, Cyrus
author_facet Sandmann, Sarah
Karsch, Katharina
Bartel, Peter
Exeler, Rita
Brix, Tobias J.
Mai, Elias K.
Varghese, Julian
Lenz, Georg
Khandanpour, Cyrus
author_sort Sandmann, Sarah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A variety of biomarkers are considered for diagnosis (e.g., β2-microgobulin, albumin, or LDH) and prognosis [e.g., cytogenetic aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] of multiple myeloma (MM). More recently, clonal evolution has been established as key. Little is known on the clinical implications of clonal evolution. METHODS: We performed in-depth analyses of 25 patients with newly diagnosed MM with respect to detailed clinical information analyzing blood samples collected at several time points during follow-up (median follow-up: 3.26 years since first diagnosis). We split our cohort into two subgroups: with and without new FISH clones developing in the course of disease. RESULTS: Each subgroup showed a characteristic chromosomal profile. Forty-three percent of patients had evidence of appearing new clones. The patients with new clones showed an increased number of translocations affecting chromosomes 14 (78% vs. 33%; p = 0.0805) and 11, and alterations in chromosome 4 (amplifications and translocations). New clones, on the contrary, were characterized by alterations affecting chromosome 17. Subsequent to the development of the new clone, 6 out of 9 patients experienced disease progression compared to 3 out of 12 for patients without new clones. Duration of the therapy applied for the longest time was significantly shorter within the group of patients developing new clones (median: 273 vs. 406.5 days; p = 0.0465). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated that the development of new clones, carrying large-scale alterations, was associated with inferior disease course and shorter response to therapy, possibly affecting progression-free survival and overall survival as well. Further studies evaluating larger cohorts are necessary for the validation of our results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9343617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93436172022-08-03 The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Sandmann, Sarah Karsch, Katharina Bartel, Peter Exeler, Rita Brix, Tobias J. Mai, Elias K. Varghese, Julian Lenz, Georg Khandanpour, Cyrus Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: A variety of biomarkers are considered for diagnosis (e.g., β2-microgobulin, albumin, or LDH) and prognosis [e.g., cytogenetic aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] of multiple myeloma (MM). More recently, clonal evolution has been established as key. Little is known on the clinical implications of clonal evolution. METHODS: We performed in-depth analyses of 25 patients with newly diagnosed MM with respect to detailed clinical information analyzing blood samples collected at several time points during follow-up (median follow-up: 3.26 years since first diagnosis). We split our cohort into two subgroups: with and without new FISH clones developing in the course of disease. RESULTS: Each subgroup showed a characteristic chromosomal profile. Forty-three percent of patients had evidence of appearing new clones. The patients with new clones showed an increased number of translocations affecting chromosomes 14 (78% vs. 33%; p = 0.0805) and 11, and alterations in chromosome 4 (amplifications and translocations). New clones, on the contrary, were characterized by alterations affecting chromosome 17. Subsequent to the development of the new clone, 6 out of 9 patients experienced disease progression compared to 3 out of 12 for patients without new clones. Duration of the therapy applied for the longest time was significantly shorter within the group of patients developing new clones (median: 273 vs. 406.5 days; p = 0.0465). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated that the development of new clones, carrying large-scale alterations, was associated with inferior disease course and shorter response to therapy, possibly affecting progression-free survival and overall survival as well. Further studies evaluating larger cohorts are necessary for the validation of our results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9343617/ /pubmed/35928862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.919278 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sandmann, Karsch, Bartel, Exeler, Brix, Mai, Varghese, Lenz and Khandanpour https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Sandmann, Sarah
Karsch, Katharina
Bartel, Peter
Exeler, Rita
Brix, Tobias J.
Mai, Elias K.
Varghese, Julian
Lenz, Georg
Khandanpour, Cyrus
The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
title The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
title_full The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
title_short The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
title_sort role of clonal evolution on progression, blood parameters, and response to therapy in multiple myeloma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.919278
work_keys_str_mv AT sandmannsarah theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT karschkatharina theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT bartelpeter theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT exelerrita theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT brixtobiasj theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT maieliask theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT varghesejulian theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT lenzgeorg theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT khandanpourcyrus theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT sandmannsarah roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT karschkatharina roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT bartelpeter roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT exelerrita roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT brixtobiasj roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT maieliask roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT varghesejulian roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT lenzgeorg roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma
AT khandanpourcyrus roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma