Cargando…
The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
INTRODUCTION: A variety of biomarkers are considered for diagnosis (e.g., β2-microgobulin, albumin, or LDH) and prognosis [e.g., cytogenetic aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] of multiple myeloma (MM). More recently, clonal evolution has been established as key. Littl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.919278 |
_version_ | 1784761029126782976 |
---|---|
author | Sandmann, Sarah Karsch, Katharina Bartel, Peter Exeler, Rita Brix, Tobias J. Mai, Elias K. Varghese, Julian Lenz, Georg Khandanpour, Cyrus |
author_facet | Sandmann, Sarah Karsch, Katharina Bartel, Peter Exeler, Rita Brix, Tobias J. Mai, Elias K. Varghese, Julian Lenz, Georg Khandanpour, Cyrus |
author_sort | Sandmann, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A variety of biomarkers are considered for diagnosis (e.g., β2-microgobulin, albumin, or LDH) and prognosis [e.g., cytogenetic aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] of multiple myeloma (MM). More recently, clonal evolution has been established as key. Little is known on the clinical implications of clonal evolution. METHODS: We performed in-depth analyses of 25 patients with newly diagnosed MM with respect to detailed clinical information analyzing blood samples collected at several time points during follow-up (median follow-up: 3.26 years since first diagnosis). We split our cohort into two subgroups: with and without new FISH clones developing in the course of disease. RESULTS: Each subgroup showed a characteristic chromosomal profile. Forty-three percent of patients had evidence of appearing new clones. The patients with new clones showed an increased number of translocations affecting chromosomes 14 (78% vs. 33%; p = 0.0805) and 11, and alterations in chromosome 4 (amplifications and translocations). New clones, on the contrary, were characterized by alterations affecting chromosome 17. Subsequent to the development of the new clone, 6 out of 9 patients experienced disease progression compared to 3 out of 12 for patients without new clones. Duration of the therapy applied for the longest time was significantly shorter within the group of patients developing new clones (median: 273 vs. 406.5 days; p = 0.0465). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated that the development of new clones, carrying large-scale alterations, was associated with inferior disease course and shorter response to therapy, possibly affecting progression-free survival and overall survival as well. Further studies evaluating larger cohorts are necessary for the validation of our results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9343617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93436172022-08-03 The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Sandmann, Sarah Karsch, Katharina Bartel, Peter Exeler, Rita Brix, Tobias J. Mai, Elias K. Varghese, Julian Lenz, Georg Khandanpour, Cyrus Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: A variety of biomarkers are considered for diagnosis (e.g., β2-microgobulin, albumin, or LDH) and prognosis [e.g., cytogenetic aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] of multiple myeloma (MM). More recently, clonal evolution has been established as key. Little is known on the clinical implications of clonal evolution. METHODS: We performed in-depth analyses of 25 patients with newly diagnosed MM with respect to detailed clinical information analyzing blood samples collected at several time points during follow-up (median follow-up: 3.26 years since first diagnosis). We split our cohort into two subgroups: with and without new FISH clones developing in the course of disease. RESULTS: Each subgroup showed a characteristic chromosomal profile. Forty-three percent of patients had evidence of appearing new clones. The patients with new clones showed an increased number of translocations affecting chromosomes 14 (78% vs. 33%; p = 0.0805) and 11, and alterations in chromosome 4 (amplifications and translocations). New clones, on the contrary, were characterized by alterations affecting chromosome 17. Subsequent to the development of the new clone, 6 out of 9 patients experienced disease progression compared to 3 out of 12 for patients without new clones. Duration of the therapy applied for the longest time was significantly shorter within the group of patients developing new clones (median: 273 vs. 406.5 days; p = 0.0465). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated that the development of new clones, carrying large-scale alterations, was associated with inferior disease course and shorter response to therapy, possibly affecting progression-free survival and overall survival as well. Further studies evaluating larger cohorts are necessary for the validation of our results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9343617/ /pubmed/35928862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.919278 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sandmann, Karsch, Bartel, Exeler, Brix, Mai, Varghese, Lenz and Khandanpour https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Sandmann, Sarah Karsch, Katharina Bartel, Peter Exeler, Rita Brix, Tobias J. Mai, Elias K. Varghese, Julian Lenz, Georg Khandanpour, Cyrus The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma |
title | The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma |
title_full | The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma |
title_fullStr | The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma |
title_short | The Role of Clonal Evolution on Progression, Blood Parameters, and Response to Therapy in Multiple Myeloma |
title_sort | role of clonal evolution on progression, blood parameters, and response to therapy in multiple myeloma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.919278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandmannsarah theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT karschkatharina theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT bartelpeter theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT exelerrita theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT brixtobiasj theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT maieliask theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT varghesejulian theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT lenzgeorg theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT khandanpourcyrus theroleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT sandmannsarah roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT karschkatharina roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT bartelpeter roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT exelerrita roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT brixtobiasj roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT maieliask roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT varghesejulian roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT lenzgeorg roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma AT khandanpourcyrus roleofclonalevolutiononprogressionbloodparametersandresponsetotherapyinmultiplemyeloma |