Cargando…

Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a nociceptive stimulus on respiratory variables in anesthetized dogs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eleven dogs received acepromazine administered intramuscularly (IM) at a dose of 0.04 mg kg(−1) 45 mins before induction of anesthesia. Loss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sylvain, Lepape, Jerneja, Sredensek, Karine, Portier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.843956
_version_ 1784761065932849152
author Sylvain, Lepape
Jerneja, Sredensek
Karine, Portier
author_facet Sylvain, Lepape
Jerneja, Sredensek
Karine, Portier
author_sort Sylvain, Lepape
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a nociceptive stimulus on respiratory variables in anesthetized dogs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eleven dogs received acepromazine administered intramuscularly (IM) at a dose of 0.04 mg kg(−1) 45 mins before induction of anesthesia. Loss of consciousness was obtained with midazolam at 0.2 mg kg(−1) and propofol administered at a dose of 2 mg kg(−1) intravenously (IV). Orotracheal intubation was performed and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Inspired (V(Ti)) and expired (V(Te)) tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume (V(M)), inspiratory and expiratory time (Ti; Te) were measured and recorded twice a second by a spirometer. The Drive (V(T)/T(i)) and Timing [Ti/(Ti+ Te)] were calculated. After stabilizing the depth of anesthesia the variables measured by the spirometer were recorded for 5 mins [T(0−5)-T(0)]. Then (T(0)) interdigital clamping of the hind leg was performed until a withdrawal movement was observed. If no reaction occurred, the clamp was left in place for 60s. After removal of the clamp, respiratory variables were measured continuously for another 5 mins [T(0)-T(0+5)]. At T(0+5) morphine (0.2 mg kg(−1) IV) was administered. Five minutes later (T(0+10)), a second clamp test was performed, using the same procedure. At T(0+15) the data recording was stopped. RESULT: The results showed a large variation in the individual values of Drive and Timing and are presented in a descriptive manner. The observation of Drive values over time showed variations following nociceptive stimuli. Drive appears to have increased only for those dogs that did not move during the stimulus, and were therefore pinched for a full 60 s. In contrast, the study of the Timing values revealed no difference between the data before and after nociceptive stimulation. However Timing seems to increase after morphine administration. CONCLUSION: Drive remains a parameter that needs to be studied in depth to determine its sensitivity and precocity to monitor acute nociception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9343778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93437782022-08-03 Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study Sylvain, Lepape Jerneja, Sredensek Karine, Portier Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a nociceptive stimulus on respiratory variables in anesthetized dogs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eleven dogs received acepromazine administered intramuscularly (IM) at a dose of 0.04 mg kg(−1) 45 mins before induction of anesthesia. Loss of consciousness was obtained with midazolam at 0.2 mg kg(−1) and propofol administered at a dose of 2 mg kg(−1) intravenously (IV). Orotracheal intubation was performed and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Inspired (V(Ti)) and expired (V(Te)) tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume (V(M)), inspiratory and expiratory time (Ti; Te) were measured and recorded twice a second by a spirometer. The Drive (V(T)/T(i)) and Timing [Ti/(Ti+ Te)] were calculated. After stabilizing the depth of anesthesia the variables measured by the spirometer were recorded for 5 mins [T(0−5)-T(0)]. Then (T(0)) interdigital clamping of the hind leg was performed until a withdrawal movement was observed. If no reaction occurred, the clamp was left in place for 60s. After removal of the clamp, respiratory variables were measured continuously for another 5 mins [T(0)-T(0+5)]. At T(0+5) morphine (0.2 mg kg(−1) IV) was administered. Five minutes later (T(0+10)), a second clamp test was performed, using the same procedure. At T(0+15) the data recording was stopped. RESULT: The results showed a large variation in the individual values of Drive and Timing and are presented in a descriptive manner. The observation of Drive values over time showed variations following nociceptive stimuli. Drive appears to have increased only for those dogs that did not move during the stimulus, and were therefore pinched for a full 60 s. In contrast, the study of the Timing values revealed no difference between the data before and after nociceptive stimulation. However Timing seems to increase after morphine administration. CONCLUSION: Drive remains a parameter that needs to be studied in depth to determine its sensitivity and precocity to monitor acute nociception. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9343778/ /pubmed/35928110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.843956 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sylvain, Jerneja and Karine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Sylvain, Lepape
Jerneja, Sredensek
Karine, Portier
Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study
title Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study
title_full Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study
title_fullStr Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study
title_short Respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: A descriptive pilot study
title_sort respiratory response to finger clamping in dogs under general anesthesia: a descriptive pilot study
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.843956
work_keys_str_mv AT sylvainlepape respiratoryresponsetofingerclampingindogsundergeneralanesthesiaadescriptivepilotstudy
AT jernejasredensek respiratoryresponsetofingerclampingindogsundergeneralanesthesiaadescriptivepilotstudy
AT karineportier respiratoryresponsetofingerclampingindogsundergeneralanesthesiaadescriptivepilotstudy