Poster 128: Association Between Postoperative Graft Integrity and Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsule Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES: Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) was developed as a joint-preserving surgical option for patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Previous studies have postulated that graft thickness and graft healing may be important factors for optimizing the clinical outcomes of SCR. However, the correlation between postoperative graft integrity and clinical outcomes after SCR remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation between postoperative graft integrity and clinical outcomes after SCR in patients with irreparable RCTs. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study enrolled 188 patients (86 women and 102 men; mean age, 69.2 years; range, 49–87 years) who underwent arthroscopic SCR using fascia lata autografts for irreparable RCTs from five different centers. Postoperative graft integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and was classified into five categories: type I, sufficient graft thickness with homogeneously low intensity; type II, sufficient graft thickness with partial high intensity; type III, insufficient graft thickness (4 mm or less) without discontinuity; type IV, presence of a minor discontinuity in less than four slices on both oblique coronal and sagittal images, suggesting a small graft tear; type V, presence of a major discontinuity in four or more slices on both oblique coronal and sagittal images, suggesting a large graft tear. We compared the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), muscle strength (assessed with manual muscle test), and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) among the five groups based on postoperative graft integrity. For the statistical analyses, Kruskal-Wallis test (nonparametric one-way analysis of variance) followed by pairwise group comparisons using the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner procedure was used to compare the values among the five groups based on the postoperative graft integrity assessment. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome measures and AHD. Statistical significance was defined as P <0.05. RESULTS: VAS and ASES score significantly improved after SCR in all graft types (all P<.05) (Table 1). However, shoulders with type V grafts had significantly inferior postoperative VAS and ASES score compared to those with type I and II grafts (all P<.05). Shoulders with intact grafts (types I, II, and III) showed significant improvements in shoulder ROM (all P<.05) (Table 2) and muscle strength after SCR (all P<.05) (Table 3). In contrast, shoulders with graft tears (types IV and V) showed no significant improvement in the range of external and internal rotation and shoulder muscle strength in any direction. Postoperative AHD was significantly increased only in shoulders with sufficient graft thickness (types I and II) (both P<.0001) (Table 4). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic SCR provided pain relief even in patients with graft tears. However, patients with large graft tears had significantly inferior postoperative clinical scores compared to those with intact graft of sufficient thickness. Shoulder ROM and muscle strength were increased after SCR in shoulders with intact grafts but not in those with large graft tears. Postoperative AHD was significantly increased only in shoulders with intact graft of sufficient thickness. These results suggest that postoperative graft integrity affect clinical outcomes after SCR. An intact graft of sufficient thickness restored glenohumeral stability and substantially improved clinical outcomes.