Cargando…

Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique

OBJECTIVES: Recent biomechanical studies have compared traditional transosseus (TO) quadriceps tendon repairs to newer techniques for suture anchor (SA) repair. However, clinical studies comparing the two techniques are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and patient repo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trasolini, Nicholas, Walsh, Justin, Darbandi, Azad, Rice, Richard, Forsythe, Brian, Verma, Nikhil, Cole, Brian, Yanke, Adam, Dandu, Navya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344157/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00752
_version_ 1784761157381259264
author Trasolini, Nicholas
Walsh, Justin
Darbandi, Azad
Rice, Richard
Forsythe, Brian
Verma, Nikhil
Cole, Brian
Yanke, Adam
Dandu, Navya
author_facet Trasolini, Nicholas
Walsh, Justin
Darbandi, Azad
Rice, Richard
Forsythe, Brian
Verma, Nikhil
Cole, Brian
Yanke, Adam
Dandu, Navya
author_sort Trasolini, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Recent biomechanical studies have compared traditional transosseus (TO) quadriceps tendon repairs to newer techniques for suture anchor (SA) repair. However, clinical studies comparing the two techniques are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and patient reported outcomes between TO and SA quadriceps tendon repairs. METHODS: Following IRB approval, patients who underwent primary repair for quadriceps tendon rupture with transosseus tunnel (TO) or suture anchor (SA) techniques between January 2009 and August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were contacted by email or telephone interview for satisfaction (1-10 scale), current function (1-100 scale), failure (retear), and revision surgeries; International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), Lysholm questionnaire outcomes were also collected. RESULTS: Seventy patients (92.1%) were available by phone or email at a mean of 4.64±2.53 years postoperatively (transosseus sutures: 34 and suture anchor: 42). Out of these 70 patients, there were 10 failures for an overall failure rate of 14.29% (Table 1). Failure rates were not significantly different between treatment groups (TO: 5/34, 14.71% vs SA: 5/42, 11.90%, p=.622) (Figure 1). Patients in each repair group had similar satisfaction ratings (SA: 9.17±1.95 vs TO: 8.31±2.30, p=.102). The SA group reported higher subjective function (SA: 89.08±8.40 vs TO: 76.14±23.52, p=.003) and significantly greater final IKDC scores (72.30 ± 22.08 vs 56.80 ± 16.62; p=.041). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is no significant difference in failure rate between transosseus and suture anchor repairs for quadriceps tendon ruptures at a mean of 4.64±2.53 years of follow-up. Most failures occur secondary to a traumatic reinjury within the first year post-operatively. Patients who underwent suture anchor repair reported significantly greater subjective function and final IKDC, KOOS Pain, and KOOS Quality of Life scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9344157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93441572022-08-03 Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique Trasolini, Nicholas Walsh, Justin Darbandi, Azad Rice, Richard Forsythe, Brian Verma, Nikhil Cole, Brian Yanke, Adam Dandu, Navya Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Recent biomechanical studies have compared traditional transosseus (TO) quadriceps tendon repairs to newer techniques for suture anchor (SA) repair. However, clinical studies comparing the two techniques are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and patient reported outcomes between TO and SA quadriceps tendon repairs. METHODS: Following IRB approval, patients who underwent primary repair for quadriceps tendon rupture with transosseus tunnel (TO) or suture anchor (SA) techniques between January 2009 and August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were contacted by email or telephone interview for satisfaction (1-10 scale), current function (1-100 scale), failure (retear), and revision surgeries; International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), Lysholm questionnaire outcomes were also collected. RESULTS: Seventy patients (92.1%) were available by phone or email at a mean of 4.64±2.53 years postoperatively (transosseus sutures: 34 and suture anchor: 42). Out of these 70 patients, there were 10 failures for an overall failure rate of 14.29% (Table 1). Failure rates were not significantly different between treatment groups (TO: 5/34, 14.71% vs SA: 5/42, 11.90%, p=.622) (Figure 1). Patients in each repair group had similar satisfaction ratings (SA: 9.17±1.95 vs TO: 8.31±2.30, p=.102). The SA group reported higher subjective function (SA: 89.08±8.40 vs TO: 76.14±23.52, p=.003) and significantly greater final IKDC scores (72.30 ± 22.08 vs 56.80 ± 16.62; p=.041). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there is no significant difference in failure rate between transosseus and suture anchor repairs for quadriceps tendon ruptures at a mean of 4.64±2.53 years of follow-up. Most failures occur secondary to a traumatic reinjury within the first year post-operatively. Patients who underwent suture anchor repair reported significantly greater subjective function and final IKDC, KOOS Pain, and KOOS Quality of Life scores. SAGE Publications 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9344157/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00752 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Trasolini, Nicholas
Walsh, Justin
Darbandi, Azad
Rice, Richard
Forsythe, Brian
Verma, Nikhil
Cole, Brian
Yanke, Adam
Dandu, Navya
Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique
title Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique
title_full Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique
title_fullStr Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique
title_full_unstemmed Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique
title_short Poster 191: Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair Results in Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique
title_sort poster 191: suture anchor-based quadriceps tendon repair results in improved patient reported outcomes compared to the transosseous tunnel technique
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344157/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00752
work_keys_str_mv AT trasolininicholas poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT walshjustin poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT darbandiazad poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT ricerichard poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT forsythebrian poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT vermanikhil poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT colebrian poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT yankeadam poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique
AT dandunavya poster191sutureanchorbasedquadricepstendonrepairresultsinimprovedpatientreportedoutcomescomparedtothetransosseoustunneltechnique