Cargando…

Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance

OBJECTIVES: Rupture of the distal biceps is common and demonstrates excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair. Prior studies have individually evaluated the biomechanical construct strength of multiple fixation devices, but none has comprehensively evaluated construc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie, Parvaresh, Kevin, Agarwalla, Avinesh, Forsythe, Brian, Forlenza, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00747
_version_ 1784761160367603712
author Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie
Parvaresh, Kevin
Agarwalla, Avinesh
Forsythe, Brian
Forlenza, Enrico
author_facet Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie
Parvaresh, Kevin
Agarwalla, Avinesh
Forsythe, Brian
Forlenza, Enrico
author_sort Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Rupture of the distal biceps is common and demonstrates excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair. Prior studies have individually evaluated the biomechanical construct strength of multiple fixation devices, but none has comprehensively evaluated constructs in a head-to-head comparison. We sought to compare the failure strength, maximum strength, stiffness and displacement of available constructs for distal biceps repair. METHODS: A network meta-analysis was conducted to determine the relative performance of 2 all-suture suture anchors, 2 intramedullary cortical buttons, 2 suture anchors, extramedullary cortical buttons, extramedullary cortical button plus interference screw, interference screw, single intramedullary cortical button, single suture anchor, trans-osseous suture, tension slide technique and tension slide technique plus suture tape. Analysis consisted of arm-based network meta-analysis under Bayesian random-effects model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Geometry of the network was represented visually via a network plot with nodes representing treatments and edges representing direct comparative evidence. Biomechanical outcomes of fixation techniques were summarized as treatment effects and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Rank probabilities were calculated and used to generate each treatment’s surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included in the network meta-analysis. For failure strength, the two intramedullary cortical buttons ranked highest (92.73%). For maximum strength, the extramedullary cortical button alone (86.96%) and extramedullary button plus interference screw (83.40%) ranked highest. The two intramedullary cortical buttons ranked highest in stiffness (98.75%), followed by the extramedullary cortical button with interference screw (88.75%) and extramedullary cortical button (75.00%). Finally, with respect to demonstrating the least displacement after loading, the two suture anchors (89.43%) ranked highest, followed by tension slide technique with suture tape (73.14%) and extramedullary cortical button (72.71%). CONCLUSIONS: The fixation constructs that demonstrated the greatest overall biomechanical performance in distal biceps tendon repair were the extramedullary cortical button and two intramedullary cortical buttons. Two suture anchors demonstrated the least displacement after loading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9344166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93441662022-08-03 Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie Parvaresh, Kevin Agarwalla, Avinesh Forsythe, Brian Forlenza, Enrico Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Rupture of the distal biceps is common and demonstrates excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair. Prior studies have individually evaluated the biomechanical construct strength of multiple fixation devices, but none has comprehensively evaluated constructs in a head-to-head comparison. We sought to compare the failure strength, maximum strength, stiffness and displacement of available constructs for distal biceps repair. METHODS: A network meta-analysis was conducted to determine the relative performance of 2 all-suture suture anchors, 2 intramedullary cortical buttons, 2 suture anchors, extramedullary cortical buttons, extramedullary cortical button plus interference screw, interference screw, single intramedullary cortical button, single suture anchor, trans-osseous suture, tension slide technique and tension slide technique plus suture tape. Analysis consisted of arm-based network meta-analysis under Bayesian random-effects model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Geometry of the network was represented visually via a network plot with nodes representing treatments and edges representing direct comparative evidence. Biomechanical outcomes of fixation techniques were summarized as treatment effects and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Rank probabilities were calculated and used to generate each treatment’s surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included in the network meta-analysis. For failure strength, the two intramedullary cortical buttons ranked highest (92.73%). For maximum strength, the extramedullary cortical button alone (86.96%) and extramedullary button plus interference screw (83.40%) ranked highest. The two intramedullary cortical buttons ranked highest in stiffness (98.75%), followed by the extramedullary cortical button with interference screw (88.75%) and extramedullary cortical button (75.00%). Finally, with respect to demonstrating the least displacement after loading, the two suture anchors (89.43%) ranked highest, followed by tension slide technique with suture tape (73.14%) and extramedullary cortical button (72.71%). CONCLUSIONS: The fixation constructs that demonstrated the greatest overall biomechanical performance in distal biceps tendon repair were the extramedullary cortical button and two intramedullary cortical buttons. Two suture anchors demonstrated the least displacement after loading. SAGE Publications 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9344166/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00747 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie
Parvaresh, Kevin
Agarwalla, Avinesh
Forsythe, Brian
Forlenza, Enrico
Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance
title Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance
title_full Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance
title_fullStr Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance
title_full_unstemmed Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance
title_short Poster 186: Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review & Network Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Performance
title_sort poster 186: repair of the distal biceps tendon: a systematic review & network meta-analysis of biomechanical performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00747
work_keys_str_mv AT lavoiegagneophelie poster186repairofthedistalbicepstendonasystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalperformance
AT parvareshkevin poster186repairofthedistalbicepstendonasystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalperformance
AT agarwallaavinesh poster186repairofthedistalbicepstendonasystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalperformance
AT forsythebrian poster186repairofthedistalbicepstendonasystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalperformance
AT forlenzaenrico poster186repairofthedistalbicepstendonasystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalperformance