Cargando…
Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of covid-19 death after infection with omicron BA.1 compared with delta (B.1.617.2). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: England, United Kingdom, from 1 December 2021 to 30 December 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 1 035 149 people aged 18-100 years who tested positive for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070695 |
_version_ | 1784761167134064640 |
---|---|
author | Ward, Isobel L Bermingham, Charlotte Ayoubkhani, Daniel Gethings, Owen J Pouwels, Koen B Yates, Thomas Khunti, Kamlesh Hippisley-Cox, Julia Banerjee, Amitava Walker, Ann Sarah Nafilyan, Vahé |
author_facet | Ward, Isobel L Bermingham, Charlotte Ayoubkhani, Daniel Gethings, Owen J Pouwels, Koen B Yates, Thomas Khunti, Kamlesh Hippisley-Cox, Julia Banerjee, Amitava Walker, Ann Sarah Nafilyan, Vahé |
author_sort | Ward, Isobel L |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of covid-19 death after infection with omicron BA.1 compared with delta (B.1.617.2). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: England, United Kingdom, from 1 December 2021 to 30 December 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 1 035 149 people aged 18-100 years who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 under the national surveillance programme and had an infection identified as omicron BA.1 or delta compatible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was covid-19 death as identified from death certification records. The exposure of interest was the SARS-CoV-2 variant identified from NHS Test and Trace PCR positive tests taken in the community (pillar 2) and analysed by Lighthouse laboratories. Cause specific Cox proportional hazard regression models (censoring non-covid-19 deaths) were adjusted for sex, age, vaccination status, previous infection, calendar time, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivation rank, household deprivation, university degree, keyworker status, country of birth, main language, region, disability, and comorbidities. Interactions between variant and sex, age, vaccination status, and comorbidities were also investigated. RESULTS: The risk of covid-19 death was 66% lower (95% confidence interval 54% to 75%) for omicron BA.1 compared with delta after adjusting for a wide range of potential confounders. The reduction in the risk of covid-19 death for omicron compared with delta was more pronounced in people aged 18-59 years (number of deaths: delta=46, omicron=11; hazard ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.27) than in those aged ≥70 years (number of deaths: delta=113, omicron=135; hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.61, P<0.0001). No evidence of a difference in risk was found between variant and number of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The results support earlier studies showing a reduction in severity of infection with omicron BA.1 compared with delta in terms of hospital admission. This study extends the research to also show a reduction in the risk of covid-19 death for the omicron variant compared with the delta variant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93441922022-08-02 Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study Ward, Isobel L Bermingham, Charlotte Ayoubkhani, Daniel Gethings, Owen J Pouwels, Koen B Yates, Thomas Khunti, Kamlesh Hippisley-Cox, Julia Banerjee, Amitava Walker, Ann Sarah Nafilyan, Vahé BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of covid-19 death after infection with omicron BA.1 compared with delta (B.1.617.2). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: England, United Kingdom, from 1 December 2021 to 30 December 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 1 035 149 people aged 18-100 years who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 under the national surveillance programme and had an infection identified as omicron BA.1 or delta compatible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was covid-19 death as identified from death certification records. The exposure of interest was the SARS-CoV-2 variant identified from NHS Test and Trace PCR positive tests taken in the community (pillar 2) and analysed by Lighthouse laboratories. Cause specific Cox proportional hazard regression models (censoring non-covid-19 deaths) were adjusted for sex, age, vaccination status, previous infection, calendar time, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivation rank, household deprivation, university degree, keyworker status, country of birth, main language, region, disability, and comorbidities. Interactions between variant and sex, age, vaccination status, and comorbidities were also investigated. RESULTS: The risk of covid-19 death was 66% lower (95% confidence interval 54% to 75%) for omicron BA.1 compared with delta after adjusting for a wide range of potential confounders. The reduction in the risk of covid-19 death for omicron compared with delta was more pronounced in people aged 18-59 years (number of deaths: delta=46, omicron=11; hazard ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.27) than in those aged ≥70 years (number of deaths: delta=113, omicron=135; hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.61, P<0.0001). No evidence of a difference in risk was found between variant and number of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The results support earlier studies showing a reduction in severity of infection with omicron BA.1 compared with delta in terms of hospital admission. This study extends the research to also show a reduction in the risk of covid-19 death for the omicron variant compared with the delta variant. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9344192/ /pubmed/35918098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070695 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Ward, Isobel L Bermingham, Charlotte Ayoubkhani, Daniel Gethings, Owen J Pouwels, Koen B Yates, Thomas Khunti, Kamlesh Hippisley-Cox, Julia Banerjee, Amitava Walker, Ann Sarah Nafilyan, Vahé Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study |
title | Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Risk of covid-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with delta (B.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | risk of covid-19 related deaths for sars-cov-2 omicron (b.1.1.529) compared with delta (b.1.617.2): retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wardisobell riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT berminghamcharlotte riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT ayoubkhanidaniel riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT gethingsowenj riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT pouwelskoenb riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT yatesthomas riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT khuntikamlesh riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT hippisleycoxjulia riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT banerjeeamitava riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT walkerannsarah riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy AT nafilyanvahe riskofcovid19relateddeathsforsarscov2omicronb11529comparedwithdeltab16172retrospectivecohortstudy |