Cargando…
Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction
PURPOSE: Robotic head and neck surgery is widespread nowadays. However, in the reconstruction field, the use of robotic operations is not. This article aimed to examine methodologies for conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic tumor surgery in an effort to obtain further options for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Yonsei University College of Medicine
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35914758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.8.759 |
_version_ | 1784761183980486656 |
---|---|
author | Won, Jongmin Hong, Jong Won Kim, Mi Jung Yun, In-sik Baek, Woo Yeol Lee, Won Jai Lew, Dae Hyun Koh, Yoon Woo Kim, Se-Heon |
author_facet | Won, Jongmin Hong, Jong Won Kim, Mi Jung Yun, In-sik Baek, Woo Yeol Lee, Won Jai Lew, Dae Hyun Koh, Yoon Woo Kim, Se-Heon |
author_sort | Won, Jongmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Robotic head and neck surgery is widespread nowadays. However, in the reconstruction field, the use of robotic operations is not. This article aimed to examine methodologies for conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic tumor surgery in an effort to obtain further options for future reconstruction manipulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who received head and neck robot surgery and conventional reconstructive surgery between October 2016 and September 2021. RESULTS: In total, 53 cases were performed. 67.9% of the tumors were greater than 4 cm. Regarding defect size, 47.2% of the lesions were greater than 8 cm. In terms of TNM stage, stage 3 disease was recorded in 26.4% and stage 4 in 52.8%. To make a deep and narrow field wider, we changed the patient’s posture in pre-op field, additional dissection was done. We used radial forearm flap mostly (62.2%). CONCLUSION: Conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic ENT cancer surgery is possible. One key step is to secure additional space in the deep and narrow space left after robotic surgery. For this, we opted for a radial forearm flap mostly. This can be performed as a bridgehead to perform robotic head and neck reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93442692022-08-03 Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction Won, Jongmin Hong, Jong Won Kim, Mi Jung Yun, In-sik Baek, Woo Yeol Lee, Won Jai Lew, Dae Hyun Koh, Yoon Woo Kim, Se-Heon Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Robotic head and neck surgery is widespread nowadays. However, in the reconstruction field, the use of robotic operations is not. This article aimed to examine methodologies for conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic tumor surgery in an effort to obtain further options for future reconstruction manipulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who received head and neck robot surgery and conventional reconstructive surgery between October 2016 and September 2021. RESULTS: In total, 53 cases were performed. 67.9% of the tumors were greater than 4 cm. Regarding defect size, 47.2% of the lesions were greater than 8 cm. In terms of TNM stage, stage 3 disease was recorded in 26.4% and stage 4 in 52.8%. To make a deep and narrow field wider, we changed the patient’s posture in pre-op field, additional dissection was done. We used radial forearm flap mostly (62.2%). CONCLUSION: Conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic ENT cancer surgery is possible. One key step is to secure additional space in the deep and narrow space left after robotic surgery. For this, we opted for a radial forearm flap mostly. This can be performed as a bridgehead to perform robotic head and neck reconstruction. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022-08 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9344269/ /pubmed/35914758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.8.759 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Won, Jongmin Hong, Jong Won Kim, Mi Jung Yun, In-sik Baek, Woo Yeol Lee, Won Jai Lew, Dae Hyun Koh, Yoon Woo Kim, Se-Heon Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction |
title | Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction |
title_full | Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction |
title_short | Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction |
title_sort | methodology in conventional head and neck reconstruction following robotic cancer surgery: a bridgehead robotic head and neck reconstruction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35914758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.8.759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wonjongmin methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT hongjongwon methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT kimmijung methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT yuninsik methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT baekwooyeol methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT leewonjai methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT lewdaehyun methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT kohyoonwoo methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction AT kimseheon methodologyinconventionalheadandneckreconstructionfollowingroboticcancersurgeryabridgeheadroboticheadandneckreconstruction |