Cargando…

Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability

OBJECTIVES: Trans-syndesmotic fixation with suture buttons, posterior malleolar fixation (PMF) with screws and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation with suture tape have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a malleolar fracture. However, there is no co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bryniarski, Anna, Brady, Alex, Miles, Jon, Dornan, Grant, Radsen, Jan, Fossum, Bradley, Haytmanek, C. Thomas, Husebye, Elisabeth, Clanton, Thomas, Stake, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00828
_version_ 1784761188167450624
author Bryniarski, Anna
Brady, Alex
Miles, Jon
Dornan, Grant
Radsen, Jan
Fossum, Bradley
Haytmanek, C. Thomas
Husebye, Elisabeth
Clanton, Thomas
Stake, Ingrid
author_facet Bryniarski, Anna
Brady, Alex
Miles, Jon
Dornan, Grant
Radsen, Jan
Fossum, Bradley
Haytmanek, C. Thomas
Husebye, Elisabeth
Clanton, Thomas
Stake, Ingrid
author_sort Bryniarski, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Trans-syndesmotic fixation with suture buttons, posterior malleolar fixation (PMF) with screws and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation with suture tape have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a malleolar fracture. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for small vs. large malleolar fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine which combination of: 1) posterior malleolar screw fixation, 2) syndesmotic fixation with suture button (SB), and 3) AITFL augmentation with suture tape (ST) best restored native tibio-fibular and ankle joint kinematics following a small and large posterior malleolar fracture. METHODS: Twenty fresh frozen cadaveric lower leg specimens were divided into two groups and underwent biomechanical testing using a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm in 7 states: 1) Native, 2) Syndesmosis Injury + Malleolar Fracture (Group 1: small fracture, Group 2: large fracture) 3) Screw fixation, 4) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation, 5) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation + Suture Button, 6) Suture Button + Suture Tape Augmentation, 7) Suture Button. Four biomechanical tests were performed at neutral and at 30 degrees of plantarflexion: 1) Internal Rotation, 2) External Rotation, 3) Lateral Drawer, 4) Posterior Drawer. The position of the tibia, fibula and talus were continuously recorded using a 5-camera motion capture system. RESULTS: No differences were found in the efficacy of treatments between the small fracture and large fracture groups. In the external rotation test, screws with ST augmentation resulted in best stability of the fibula and ankle joint. In the internal rotation test, all repairs that included posterior malleolar screws stabilized the fibula and ankle. Posterior and lateral drawer of the foot resulted in only small differences between the intact and malleolar fracture states. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior malleolar fixation resulted in higher syndesmotic stability compared to trans-syndesmotic fixation with SBs. AITFL augmentation with ST provided additional external rotation stability when combined with screw fixation. Posterior malleolar screw fixation with AITFL augmentation using ST may be the preferred surgical method when treating patients with acute ankle injury involving an unstable syndesmosis injury and a posterior malleolar fragment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9344287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93442872022-08-03 Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability Bryniarski, Anna Brady, Alex Miles, Jon Dornan, Grant Radsen, Jan Fossum, Bradley Haytmanek, C. Thomas Husebye, Elisabeth Clanton, Thomas Stake, Ingrid Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Trans-syndesmotic fixation with suture buttons, posterior malleolar fixation (PMF) with screws and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation with suture tape have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a malleolar fracture. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for small vs. large malleolar fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine which combination of: 1) posterior malleolar screw fixation, 2) syndesmotic fixation with suture button (SB), and 3) AITFL augmentation with suture tape (ST) best restored native tibio-fibular and ankle joint kinematics following a small and large posterior malleolar fracture. METHODS: Twenty fresh frozen cadaveric lower leg specimens were divided into two groups and underwent biomechanical testing using a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm in 7 states: 1) Native, 2) Syndesmosis Injury + Malleolar Fracture (Group 1: small fracture, Group 2: large fracture) 3) Screw fixation, 4) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation, 5) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation + Suture Button, 6) Suture Button + Suture Tape Augmentation, 7) Suture Button. Four biomechanical tests were performed at neutral and at 30 degrees of plantarflexion: 1) Internal Rotation, 2) External Rotation, 3) Lateral Drawer, 4) Posterior Drawer. The position of the tibia, fibula and talus were continuously recorded using a 5-camera motion capture system. RESULTS: No differences were found in the efficacy of treatments between the small fracture and large fracture groups. In the external rotation test, screws with ST augmentation resulted in best stability of the fibula and ankle joint. In the internal rotation test, all repairs that included posterior malleolar screws stabilized the fibula and ankle. Posterior and lateral drawer of the foot resulted in only small differences between the intact and malleolar fracture states. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior malleolar fixation resulted in higher syndesmotic stability compared to trans-syndesmotic fixation with SBs. AITFL augmentation with ST provided additional external rotation stability when combined with screw fixation. Posterior malleolar screw fixation with AITFL augmentation using ST may be the preferred surgical method when treating patients with acute ankle injury involving an unstable syndesmosis injury and a posterior malleolar fragment. SAGE Publications 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9344287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00828 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Bryniarski, Anna
Brady, Alex
Miles, Jon
Dornan, Grant
Radsen, Jan
Fossum, Bradley
Haytmanek, C. Thomas
Husebye, Elisabeth
Clanton, Thomas
Stake, Ingrid
Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability
title Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability
title_full Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability
title_fullStr Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability
title_full_unstemmed Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability
title_short Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability
title_sort poster 267: the impact of posterior malleolar fixation on syndesmotic stability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00828
work_keys_str_mv AT bryniarskianna poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT bradyalex poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT milesjon poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT dornangrant poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT radsenjan poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT fossumbradley poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT haytmanekcthomas poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT husebyeelisabeth poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT clantonthomas poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability
AT stakeingrid poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability