Cargando…
Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability
OBJECTIVES: Trans-syndesmotic fixation with suture buttons, posterior malleolar fixation (PMF) with screws and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation with suture tape have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a malleolar fracture. However, there is no co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00828 |
_version_ | 1784761188167450624 |
---|---|
author | Bryniarski, Anna Brady, Alex Miles, Jon Dornan, Grant Radsen, Jan Fossum, Bradley Haytmanek, C. Thomas Husebye, Elisabeth Clanton, Thomas Stake, Ingrid |
author_facet | Bryniarski, Anna Brady, Alex Miles, Jon Dornan, Grant Radsen, Jan Fossum, Bradley Haytmanek, C. Thomas Husebye, Elisabeth Clanton, Thomas Stake, Ingrid |
author_sort | Bryniarski, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Trans-syndesmotic fixation with suture buttons, posterior malleolar fixation (PMF) with screws and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation with suture tape have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a malleolar fracture. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for small vs. large malleolar fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine which combination of: 1) posterior malleolar screw fixation, 2) syndesmotic fixation with suture button (SB), and 3) AITFL augmentation with suture tape (ST) best restored native tibio-fibular and ankle joint kinematics following a small and large posterior malleolar fracture. METHODS: Twenty fresh frozen cadaveric lower leg specimens were divided into two groups and underwent biomechanical testing using a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm in 7 states: 1) Native, 2) Syndesmosis Injury + Malleolar Fracture (Group 1: small fracture, Group 2: large fracture) 3) Screw fixation, 4) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation, 5) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation + Suture Button, 6) Suture Button + Suture Tape Augmentation, 7) Suture Button. Four biomechanical tests were performed at neutral and at 30 degrees of plantarflexion: 1) Internal Rotation, 2) External Rotation, 3) Lateral Drawer, 4) Posterior Drawer. The position of the tibia, fibula and talus were continuously recorded using a 5-camera motion capture system. RESULTS: No differences were found in the efficacy of treatments between the small fracture and large fracture groups. In the external rotation test, screws with ST augmentation resulted in best stability of the fibula and ankle joint. In the internal rotation test, all repairs that included posterior malleolar screws stabilized the fibula and ankle. Posterior and lateral drawer of the foot resulted in only small differences between the intact and malleolar fracture states. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior malleolar fixation resulted in higher syndesmotic stability compared to trans-syndesmotic fixation with SBs. AITFL augmentation with ST provided additional external rotation stability when combined with screw fixation. Posterior malleolar screw fixation with AITFL augmentation using ST may be the preferred surgical method when treating patients with acute ankle injury involving an unstable syndesmosis injury and a posterior malleolar fragment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93442872022-08-03 Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability Bryniarski, Anna Brady, Alex Miles, Jon Dornan, Grant Radsen, Jan Fossum, Bradley Haytmanek, C. Thomas Husebye, Elisabeth Clanton, Thomas Stake, Ingrid Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Trans-syndesmotic fixation with suture buttons, posterior malleolar fixation (PMF) with screws and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) augmentation with suture tape have all been suggested as potential treatments in the setting of a malleolar fracture. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for small vs. large malleolar fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine which combination of: 1) posterior malleolar screw fixation, 2) syndesmotic fixation with suture button (SB), and 3) AITFL augmentation with suture tape (ST) best restored native tibio-fibular and ankle joint kinematics following a small and large posterior malleolar fracture. METHODS: Twenty fresh frozen cadaveric lower leg specimens were divided into two groups and underwent biomechanical testing using a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm in 7 states: 1) Native, 2) Syndesmosis Injury + Malleolar Fracture (Group 1: small fracture, Group 2: large fracture) 3) Screw fixation, 4) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation, 5) Screw + Suture Tape Augmentation + Suture Button, 6) Suture Button + Suture Tape Augmentation, 7) Suture Button. Four biomechanical tests were performed at neutral and at 30 degrees of plantarflexion: 1) Internal Rotation, 2) External Rotation, 3) Lateral Drawer, 4) Posterior Drawer. The position of the tibia, fibula and talus were continuously recorded using a 5-camera motion capture system. RESULTS: No differences were found in the efficacy of treatments between the small fracture and large fracture groups. In the external rotation test, screws with ST augmentation resulted in best stability of the fibula and ankle joint. In the internal rotation test, all repairs that included posterior malleolar screws stabilized the fibula and ankle. Posterior and lateral drawer of the foot resulted in only small differences between the intact and malleolar fracture states. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior malleolar fixation resulted in higher syndesmotic stability compared to trans-syndesmotic fixation with SBs. AITFL augmentation with ST provided additional external rotation stability when combined with screw fixation. Posterior malleolar screw fixation with AITFL augmentation using ST may be the preferred surgical method when treating patients with acute ankle injury involving an unstable syndesmosis injury and a posterior malleolar fragment. SAGE Publications 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9344287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00828 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions. |
spellingShingle | Article Bryniarski, Anna Brady, Alex Miles, Jon Dornan, Grant Radsen, Jan Fossum, Bradley Haytmanek, C. Thomas Husebye, Elisabeth Clanton, Thomas Stake, Ingrid Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic Stability |
title | Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic
Stability |
title_full | Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic
Stability |
title_fullStr | Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic
Stability |
title_full_unstemmed | Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic
Stability |
title_short | Poster 267: The Impact of Posterior Malleolar Fixation on Syndesmotic
Stability |
title_sort | poster 267: the impact of posterior malleolar fixation on syndesmotic
stability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bryniarskianna poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT bradyalex poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT milesjon poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT dornangrant poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT radsenjan poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT fossumbradley poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT haytmanekcthomas poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT husebyeelisabeth poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT clantonthomas poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability AT stakeingrid poster267theimpactofposteriormalleolarfixationonsyndesmoticstability |