Cargando…

Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment protocol for proximal hamstring ruptures, particularly when involving less than 3 cm of retraction, is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent operative or non-operative management of proxim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanakamedala, Ajay, Rynecki, Nicole, Markus, Danielle, Song, Melissa, Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem, Strauss, Eric, Youm, Thomas, Jazrawi, Laith, Mojica, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344300/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00799
_version_ 1784761191422230528
author Kanakamedala, Ajay
Rynecki, Nicole
Markus, Danielle
Song, Melissa
Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem
Strauss, Eric
Youm, Thomas
Jazrawi, Laith
Mojica, Edward
author_facet Kanakamedala, Ajay
Rynecki, Nicole
Markus, Danielle
Song, Melissa
Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem
Strauss, Eric
Youm, Thomas
Jazrawi, Laith
Mojica, Edward
author_sort Kanakamedala, Ajay
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment protocol for proximal hamstring ruptures, particularly when involving less than 3 cm of retraction, is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent operative or non-operative management of proximal hamstring ruptures. METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic medical record identified all patients who were treated operatively or non-operatively for a proximal hamstring rupture from 2013 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups which were matched based on demographics including age, gender, BMI, chronicity of the injury, tendon retraction, and injury grade (complete, or three tendons, versus partial, or one or two tendons). All patients completed a battery of PROs including the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT), Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), and the Tegner Activity Scale. Patients from the non-surgical group were then case-matched in 2:1 fashion to their surgical counterparts. RESULTS: Overall, 113 patients met inclusion criteria and were available for follow-up. Of the 113, 59 (52.2%) underwent primary hamstring tendon repair and 54 (47.8%) patients underwent non-operative treatment consisting of physical therapy. These 54 patients were case-matched to 28 surgically managed patients. When controlling for patient demographics, there were no differences in patient reported outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment of proximal hamstring in any validated outcome indicator (p > 0.05). Chronicity of the injury and older age correlated significantly to worse outcomes in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proximal hamstring ruptures with <3 cm of retraction, there was no difference in PRO scores between matched cohorts of operatively and non-operatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9344300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93443002022-08-03 Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study Kanakamedala, Ajay Rynecki, Nicole Markus, Danielle Song, Melissa Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem Strauss, Eric Youm, Thomas Jazrawi, Laith Mojica, Edward Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment protocol for proximal hamstring ruptures, particularly when involving less than 3 cm of retraction, is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent operative or non-operative management of proximal hamstring ruptures. METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic medical record identified all patients who were treated operatively or non-operatively for a proximal hamstring rupture from 2013 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups which were matched based on demographics including age, gender, BMI, chronicity of the injury, tendon retraction, and injury grade (complete, or three tendons, versus partial, or one or two tendons). All patients completed a battery of PROs including the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT), Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), and the Tegner Activity Scale. Patients from the non-surgical group were then case-matched in 2:1 fashion to their surgical counterparts. RESULTS: Overall, 113 patients met inclusion criteria and were available for follow-up. Of the 113, 59 (52.2%) underwent primary hamstring tendon repair and 54 (47.8%) patients underwent non-operative treatment consisting of physical therapy. These 54 patients were case-matched to 28 surgically managed patients. When controlling for patient demographics, there were no differences in patient reported outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment of proximal hamstring in any validated outcome indicator (p > 0.05). Chronicity of the injury and older age correlated significantly to worse outcomes in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proximal hamstring ruptures with <3 cm of retraction, there was no difference in PRO scores between matched cohorts of operatively and non-operatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions SAGE Publications 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9344300/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00799 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Kanakamedala, Ajay
Rynecki, Nicole
Markus, Danielle
Song, Melissa
Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem
Strauss, Eric
Youm, Thomas
Jazrawi, Laith
Mojica, Edward
Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study
title Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study
title_full Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study
title_fullStr Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study
title_short Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study
title_sort poster 238: no difference in clinical outcomes between operative and nonoperative management of minimally retracted proximal hamstring ruptures: a matched cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344300/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00799
work_keys_str_mv AT kanakamedalaajay poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT ryneckinicole poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT markusdanielle poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT songmelissa poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT gonzalezlomasguillem poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT strausseric poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT youmthomas poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT jazrawilaith poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy
AT mojicaedward poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy