Cargando…
Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study
OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment protocol for proximal hamstring ruptures, particularly when involving less than 3 cm of retraction, is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent operative or non-operative management of proxim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344300/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00799 |
_version_ | 1784761191422230528 |
---|---|
author | Kanakamedala, Ajay Rynecki, Nicole Markus, Danielle Song, Melissa Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem Strauss, Eric Youm, Thomas Jazrawi, Laith Mojica, Edward |
author_facet | Kanakamedala, Ajay Rynecki, Nicole Markus, Danielle Song, Melissa Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem Strauss, Eric Youm, Thomas Jazrawi, Laith Mojica, Edward |
author_sort | Kanakamedala, Ajay |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment protocol for proximal hamstring ruptures, particularly when involving less than 3 cm of retraction, is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent operative or non-operative management of proximal hamstring ruptures. METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic medical record identified all patients who were treated operatively or non-operatively for a proximal hamstring rupture from 2013 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups which were matched based on demographics including age, gender, BMI, chronicity of the injury, tendon retraction, and injury grade (complete, or three tendons, versus partial, or one or two tendons). All patients completed a battery of PROs including the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT), Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), and the Tegner Activity Scale. Patients from the non-surgical group were then case-matched in 2:1 fashion to their surgical counterparts. RESULTS: Overall, 113 patients met inclusion criteria and were available for follow-up. Of the 113, 59 (52.2%) underwent primary hamstring tendon repair and 54 (47.8%) patients underwent non-operative treatment consisting of physical therapy. These 54 patients were case-matched to 28 surgically managed patients. When controlling for patient demographics, there were no differences in patient reported outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment of proximal hamstring in any validated outcome indicator (p > 0.05). Chronicity of the injury and older age correlated significantly to worse outcomes in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proximal hamstring ruptures with <3 cm of retraction, there was no difference in PRO scores between matched cohorts of operatively and non-operatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93443002022-08-03 Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study Kanakamedala, Ajay Rynecki, Nicole Markus, Danielle Song, Melissa Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem Strauss, Eric Youm, Thomas Jazrawi, Laith Mojica, Edward Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment protocol for proximal hamstring ruptures, particularly when involving less than 3 cm of retraction, is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent operative or non-operative management of proximal hamstring ruptures. METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic medical record identified all patients who were treated operatively or non-operatively for a proximal hamstring rupture from 2013 to 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups which were matched based on demographics including age, gender, BMI, chronicity of the injury, tendon retraction, and injury grade (complete, or three tendons, versus partial, or one or two tendons). All patients completed a battery of PROs including the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT), Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), and the Tegner Activity Scale. Patients from the non-surgical group were then case-matched in 2:1 fashion to their surgical counterparts. RESULTS: Overall, 113 patients met inclusion criteria and were available for follow-up. Of the 113, 59 (52.2%) underwent primary hamstring tendon repair and 54 (47.8%) patients underwent non-operative treatment consisting of physical therapy. These 54 patients were case-matched to 28 surgically managed patients. When controlling for patient demographics, there were no differences in patient reported outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment of proximal hamstring in any validated outcome indicator (p > 0.05). Chronicity of the injury and older age correlated significantly to worse outcomes in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proximal hamstring ruptures with <3 cm of retraction, there was no difference in PRO scores between matched cohorts of operatively and non-operatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions SAGE Publications 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9344300/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00799 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions. |
spellingShingle | Article Kanakamedala, Ajay Rynecki, Nicole Markus, Danielle Song, Melissa Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem Strauss, Eric Youm, Thomas Jazrawi, Laith Mojica, Edward Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A Matched Cohort Study |
title | Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and
Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A
Matched Cohort Study |
title_full | Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and
Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A
Matched Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and
Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A
Matched Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and
Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A
Matched Cohort Study |
title_short | Poster 238: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes between Operative and
Nonoperative Management of Minimally Retracted Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: A
Matched Cohort Study |
title_sort | poster 238: no difference in clinical outcomes between operative and
nonoperative management of minimally retracted proximal hamstring ruptures: a
matched cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344300/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanakamedalaajay poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT ryneckinicole poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT markusdanielle poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT songmelissa poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT gonzalezlomasguillem poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT strausseric poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT youmthomas poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT jazrawilaith poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy AT mojicaedward poster238nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomesbetweenoperativeandnonoperativemanagementofminimallyretractedproximalhamstringrupturesamatchedcohortstudy |