Cargando…

Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies

STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc comparison using single-site data from 4 multicenter randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: Discogenic back pain is associated with significant morbidity and medical cost. Several terminated, unreported randomized controlled trials have studied the effect of intradiscal bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ju, Derek G., Kanim, Linda E., Bae, Hyun W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220963058
_version_ 1784761233211129856
author Ju, Derek G.
Kanim, Linda E.
Bae, Hyun W.
author_facet Ju, Derek G.
Kanim, Linda E.
Bae, Hyun W.
author_sort Ju, Derek G.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc comparison using single-site data from 4 multicenter randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: Discogenic back pain is associated with significant morbidity and medical cost. Several terminated, unreported randomized controlled trials have studied the effect of intradiscal biologic injections. Here we report single-center outcomes from these trials to determine if there is clinical improvement associated with these intradiscal injections. METHODS: Post hoc comparison was performed using single-site data from 4 similar multi-center randomized controlled trials. All trials evaluated an injectable therapy (growth factor, fibrin sealant, or stem cells) for symptomatic lumbar disc disease with near-identical inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographics and patient reported outcomes were analyzed across treatment arms postinjection. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were treated with biologic agents and 12 were treated with control saline injections. There was a significant decrease in visual analogue score (VAS) pain for both the investigational and saline groups up to 12 months postinjection (P < .01). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the saline and investigational groups at 12 months. Similarly, there was significant improvement in patient-reported disability scores in both the investigational and saline groups at all time points. There were no significant differences in disability score improvement between the saline and investigational treatment groups at 12 months postinjection. CONCLUSIONS: A single-center analysis of 4 randomized controlled studies demonstrated no difference in outcomes between therapeutic intradiscal agents (growth factor, fibrin sealant, or stem cells) and control saline groups. In all groups, patient reported pain and disability scores decreased significantly. Future studies are needed to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of any intradiscal injections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9344499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93444992022-08-03 Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies Ju, Derek G. Kanim, Linda E. Bae, Hyun W. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc comparison using single-site data from 4 multicenter randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: Discogenic back pain is associated with significant morbidity and medical cost. Several terminated, unreported randomized controlled trials have studied the effect of intradiscal biologic injections. Here we report single-center outcomes from these trials to determine if there is clinical improvement associated with these intradiscal injections. METHODS: Post hoc comparison was performed using single-site data from 4 similar multi-center randomized controlled trials. All trials evaluated an injectable therapy (growth factor, fibrin sealant, or stem cells) for symptomatic lumbar disc disease with near-identical inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographics and patient reported outcomes were analyzed across treatment arms postinjection. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were treated with biologic agents and 12 were treated with control saline injections. There was a significant decrease in visual analogue score (VAS) pain for both the investigational and saline groups up to 12 months postinjection (P < .01). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the saline and investigational groups at 12 months. Similarly, there was significant improvement in patient-reported disability scores in both the investigational and saline groups at all time points. There were no significant differences in disability score improvement between the saline and investigational treatment groups at 12 months postinjection. CONCLUSIONS: A single-center analysis of 4 randomized controlled studies demonstrated no difference in outcomes between therapeutic intradiscal agents (growth factor, fibrin sealant, or stem cells) and control saline groups. In all groups, patient reported pain and disability scores decreased significantly. Future studies are needed to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of any intradiscal injections. SAGE Publications 2020-10-13 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9344499/ /pubmed/33047622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220963058 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ju, Derek G.
Kanim, Linda E.
Bae, Hyun W.
Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies
title Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies
title_full Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies
title_fullStr Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies
title_full_unstemmed Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies
title_short Is There Clinical Improvement Associated With Intradiscal Therapies? A Comparison Across Randomized Controlled Studies
title_sort is there clinical improvement associated with intradiscal therapies? a comparison across randomized controlled studies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220963058
work_keys_str_mv AT juderekg isthereclinicalimprovementassociatedwithintradiscaltherapiesacomparisonacrossrandomizedcontrolledstudies
AT kanimlindae isthereclinicalimprovementassociatedwithintradiscaltherapiesacomparisonacrossrandomizedcontrolledstudies
AT baehyunw isthereclinicalimprovementassociatedwithintradiscaltherapiesacomparisonacrossrandomizedcontrolledstudies