Cargando…
Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO Data
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective/prospective study. OBJECTIVE: Models based on preoperative factors can predict patients’ outcome at 1-year follow-up. This study measures the performance of several machine learning (ML) models and compares the results with conventional methods. METHODS: Inclusion criteri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220967643 |
_version_ | 1784761234660261888 |
---|---|
author | Pedersen, Casper Friis Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden Carreon, Leah Yacat Eiskjær, Søren |
author_facet | Pedersen, Casper Friis Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden Carreon, Leah Yacat Eiskjær, Søren |
author_sort | Pedersen, Casper Friis |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective/prospective study. OBJECTIVE: Models based on preoperative factors can predict patients’ outcome at 1-year follow-up. This study measures the performance of several machine learning (ML) models and compares the results with conventional methods. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients who had lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery, identified in the Danish national registry for spine surgery. Initial training of models included 16 independent variables, including demographics and presurgical patient-reported measures. Patients were grouped by reaching minimal clinically important difference or not for EuroQol, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg, and VAS Back and by their ability to return to work at 1 year follow-up. Data were randomly split into training, validation, and test sets by 50%/35%/15%. Deep learning, decision trees, random forest, boosted trees, and support vector machines model were trained, and for comparison, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and logistic regression models were used. Model fit was evaluated by inspecting area under the curve curves and performance during validation. RESULTS: Seven models were arrived at. Classification errors were within ±1% to 4% SD across validation folds. ML did not yield superior performance compared with conventional models. MARS and deep learning performed consistently well. Discrepancy was greatest among VAS Leg models. CONCLUSIONS: Five predictive ML and 2 conventional models were developed, predicting improvement for LDH patients at the 1-year follow-up. We demonstrate that it is possible to build an ensemble of models with little effort as a starting point for further model optimization and selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93445052022-08-03 Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO Data Pedersen, Casper Friis Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden Carreon, Leah Yacat Eiskjær, Søren Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective/prospective study. OBJECTIVE: Models based on preoperative factors can predict patients’ outcome at 1-year follow-up. This study measures the performance of several machine learning (ML) models and compares the results with conventional methods. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients who had lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery, identified in the Danish national registry for spine surgery. Initial training of models included 16 independent variables, including demographics and presurgical patient-reported measures. Patients were grouped by reaching minimal clinically important difference or not for EuroQol, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg, and VAS Back and by their ability to return to work at 1 year follow-up. Data were randomly split into training, validation, and test sets by 50%/35%/15%. Deep learning, decision trees, random forest, boosted trees, and support vector machines model were trained, and for comparison, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and logistic regression models were used. Model fit was evaluated by inspecting area under the curve curves and performance during validation. RESULTS: Seven models were arrived at. Classification errors were within ±1% to 4% SD across validation folds. ML did not yield superior performance compared with conventional models. MARS and deep learning performed consistently well. Discrepancy was greatest among VAS Leg models. CONCLUSIONS: Five predictive ML and 2 conventional models were developed, predicting improvement for LDH patients at the 1-year follow-up. We demonstrate that it is possible to build an ensemble of models with little effort as a starting point for further model optimization and selection. SAGE Publications 2020-11-18 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9344505/ /pubmed/33203255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220967643 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pedersen, Casper Friis Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden Carreon, Leah Yacat Eiskjær, Søren Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO Data |
title | Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for
Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO
Data |
title_full | Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for
Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO
Data |
title_fullStr | Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for
Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO
Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for
Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO
Data |
title_short | Applied Machine Learning for Spine Surgeons: Predicting Outcome for
Patients Undergoing Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Using PRO
Data |
title_sort | applied machine learning for spine surgeons: predicting outcome for
patients undergoing treatment for lumbar disc herniation using pro
data |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220967643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedersencasperfriis appliedmachinelearningforspinesurgeonspredictingoutcomeforpatientsundergoingtreatmentforlumbardischerniationusingprodata AT andersenmikkeløsterheden appliedmachinelearningforspinesurgeonspredictingoutcomeforpatientsundergoingtreatmentforlumbardischerniationusingprodata AT carreonleahyacat appliedmachinelearningforspinesurgeonspredictingoutcomeforpatientsundergoingtreatmentforlumbardischerniationusingprodata AT eiskjærsøren appliedmachinelearningforspinesurgeonspredictingoutcomeforpatientsundergoingtreatmentforlumbardischerniationusingprodata |