Cargando…
Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury?
BACKGROUND: Occupational accidents may lead laborers to lose their working capacities, affecting their physical and mental health. Occupational rehabilitation helps improve the ability of patients with occupational accidents and suggests appropriate jobs to avoid second injuries. This study aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13817-2 |
_version_ | 1784761275210792960 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Chia-Lin Yin, Yan-Ru Chu, Chuan-Man Tang, Pei-Ling |
author_facet | Yang, Chia-Lin Yin, Yan-Ru Chu, Chuan-Man Tang, Pei-Ling |
author_sort | Yang, Chia-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Occupational accidents may lead laborers to lose their working capacities, affecting their physical and mental health. Occupational rehabilitation helps improve the ability of patients with occupational accidents and suggests appropriate jobs to avoid second injuries. This study aimed to identify whether any of the functional capacity evaluation (FCE) strength subtests predicted successful return to work. METHODS: Data were collected of 84 patients receiving government-subsidized occupational rehabilitation between September 2016 and December 2018. A structured questionnaire was employed for pre- and post-training assessment, including basic information, information of the occupational accident, status of the laborer at the opening of the injury case, physical requirement for the job, and physical capacity. Eight subtests of strength were included in the physical capacity evaluation, i.e., carrying, lifting to several levels, power grip, and lateral pinch, to explore the association between the strength tests and return to work. RESULTS: The unadjusted model showed that for every additional kilogram in bilateral carrying strength before work hardening training, the odds of successful return to work increased (crude odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.24, p = 0.027). After adjustment for basic demographic information and pre-accident physical functional elements of work, the odds of successful return to work increased (adjusted OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.04–1.54, p = 0.02) for every additional kilogram in the pre-training bilateral carrying strength. There were no statistically significant differences observed in the other seven subtests. CONCLUSION: Through thorough evaluation and work hardening training provided in the occupational rehabilitation, patients’ physical capacity can be understood and improved. However, a full evaluation of functional capacities is prolonged and time-consuming. This study provides evidence that pre-work-hardening bilateral carrying strength may be a promising predictor of return to work and we recommend to consider it as a prioritized test to assist in determining appropriate advice regarding return to work. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13817-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93447042022-08-03 Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? Yang, Chia-Lin Yin, Yan-Ru Chu, Chuan-Man Tang, Pei-Ling BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Occupational accidents may lead laborers to lose their working capacities, affecting their physical and mental health. Occupational rehabilitation helps improve the ability of patients with occupational accidents and suggests appropriate jobs to avoid second injuries. This study aimed to identify whether any of the functional capacity evaluation (FCE) strength subtests predicted successful return to work. METHODS: Data were collected of 84 patients receiving government-subsidized occupational rehabilitation between September 2016 and December 2018. A structured questionnaire was employed for pre- and post-training assessment, including basic information, information of the occupational accident, status of the laborer at the opening of the injury case, physical requirement for the job, and physical capacity. Eight subtests of strength were included in the physical capacity evaluation, i.e., carrying, lifting to several levels, power grip, and lateral pinch, to explore the association between the strength tests and return to work. RESULTS: The unadjusted model showed that for every additional kilogram in bilateral carrying strength before work hardening training, the odds of successful return to work increased (crude odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.24, p = 0.027). After adjustment for basic demographic information and pre-accident physical functional elements of work, the odds of successful return to work increased (adjusted OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.04–1.54, p = 0.02) for every additional kilogram in the pre-training bilateral carrying strength. There were no statistically significant differences observed in the other seven subtests. CONCLUSION: Through thorough evaluation and work hardening training provided in the occupational rehabilitation, patients’ physical capacity can be understood and improved. However, a full evaluation of functional capacities is prolonged and time-consuming. This study provides evidence that pre-work-hardening bilateral carrying strength may be a promising predictor of return to work and we recommend to consider it as a prioritized test to assist in determining appropriate advice regarding return to work. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13817-2. BioMed Central 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9344704/ /pubmed/35918669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13817-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yang, Chia-Lin Yin, Yan-Ru Chu, Chuan-Man Tang, Pei-Ling Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? |
title | Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? |
title_full | Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? |
title_fullStr | Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? |
title_short | Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? |
title_sort | does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13817-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangchialin doescategoryofstrengthpredictreturntoworkafteroccupationalinjury AT yinyanru doescategoryofstrengthpredictreturntoworkafteroccupationalinjury AT chuchuanman doescategoryofstrengthpredictreturntoworkafteroccupationalinjury AT tangpeiling doescategoryofstrengthpredictreturntoworkafteroccupationalinjury |