Cargando…
Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block in general anesthesia for cesarean section and recovery from puerperae remain unclear. METHODS: Sixty patients with contraindications for spinal anesthesia who required general anesthesia for cesarean section were enrolled and randomly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01781-8 |
_version_ | 1784761277694869504 |
---|---|
author | hu, Jia Chen, Qi Xu, Qian Song, Yun Wei, Ke Lei, Xiao-feng |
author_facet | hu, Jia Chen, Qi Xu, Qian Song, Yun Wei, Ke Lei, Xiao-feng |
author_sort | hu, Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block in general anesthesia for cesarean section and recovery from puerperae remain unclear. METHODS: Sixty patients with contraindications for spinal anesthesia who required general anesthesia for cesarean section were enrolled and randomly divided into the erector spinal plane block (ESPB) combined with the general anesthesia group (group E) and general anesthesia group (group G). Group E received bilateral ESPB (20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine on each side) under ultrasound guidance 30 min before general anesthesia. The primary outcomes were the number of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) boluses, and Bruggemann comfort scale (BCS) scores at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after operation. The second outcome was intraoperative anesthesia dosage, fetal delivery time, puerperae emergence time, visual analog scale (VAS) at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after operation, and incidence of nausea and vomiting. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded 10 min before the start of anesthesia (T0), at the induction of anesthesia (T1), at skin incision (T2), and fetal delivery (T3), and immediately after surgery (T4). RESULTS: The number of PCIA boluses was lower in group E than in group G (P < 0.001). The BCS score increased at 2 h and 6 h after the operation in group E (P < 0.05), while the VAS score significantly decreased in group E at the same time (P < 0.05). Compared with group G, the doses of propofol and remifentanil were significantly decreased in group E (P < 0.001), the emergence time of puerperae was shortened (P = 0.003), and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly decreased (P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided ESPB applied to general anesthesia for a cesarean section can significantly reduce the required dose of general anesthetic drugs, shorten the recovery time of the puerperae, and improve postoperative analgesia. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov under the number ChiCTR2200056337 (04–02-2022). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93447142022-08-03 Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial hu, Jia Chen, Qi Xu, Qian Song, Yun Wei, Ke Lei, Xiao-feng BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The analgesic effects of erector spinae plane block in general anesthesia for cesarean section and recovery from puerperae remain unclear. METHODS: Sixty patients with contraindications for spinal anesthesia who required general anesthesia for cesarean section were enrolled and randomly divided into the erector spinal plane block (ESPB) combined with the general anesthesia group (group E) and general anesthesia group (group G). Group E received bilateral ESPB (20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine on each side) under ultrasound guidance 30 min before general anesthesia. The primary outcomes were the number of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) boluses, and Bruggemann comfort scale (BCS) scores at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after operation. The second outcome was intraoperative anesthesia dosage, fetal delivery time, puerperae emergence time, visual analog scale (VAS) at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after operation, and incidence of nausea and vomiting. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded 10 min before the start of anesthesia (T0), at the induction of anesthesia (T1), at skin incision (T2), and fetal delivery (T3), and immediately after surgery (T4). RESULTS: The number of PCIA boluses was lower in group E than in group G (P < 0.001). The BCS score increased at 2 h and 6 h after the operation in group E (P < 0.05), while the VAS score significantly decreased in group E at the same time (P < 0.05). Compared with group G, the doses of propofol and remifentanil were significantly decreased in group E (P < 0.001), the emergence time of puerperae was shortened (P = 0.003), and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly decreased (P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided ESPB applied to general anesthesia for a cesarean section can significantly reduce the required dose of general anesthetic drugs, shorten the recovery time of the puerperae, and improve postoperative analgesia. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov under the number ChiCTR2200056337 (04–02-2022). BioMed Central 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9344714/ /pubmed/35918638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01781-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research hu, Jia Chen, Qi Xu, Qian Song, Yun Wei, Ke Lei, Xiao-feng Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (espb) in general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01781-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hujia analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidederectorspinaeplaneblockespbingeneralanesthesiaforcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenqi analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidederectorspinaeplaneblockespbingeneralanesthesiaforcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xuqian analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidederectorspinaeplaneblockespbingeneralanesthesiaforcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT songyun analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidederectorspinaeplaneblockespbingeneralanesthesiaforcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weike analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidederectorspinaeplaneblockespbingeneralanesthesiaforcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leixiaofeng analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidederectorspinaeplaneblockespbingeneralanesthesiaforcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial |