Cargando…
A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340017 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.935812 |
_version_ | 1784761312768688128 |
---|---|
author | Chiu, Wei-Huai Kong, Wei-Yi Su, Yu-Jang Wen, Jyun-Wei Tsai, Ciao-Ming Hong, Chitsung Chen, Pang-Yen Ko, Cheng-Hao |
author_facet | Chiu, Wei-Huai Kong, Wei-Yi Su, Yu-Jang Wen, Jyun-Wei Tsai, Ciao-Ming Hong, Chitsung Chen, Pang-Yen Ko, Cheng-Hao |
author_sort | Chiu, Wei-Huai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify nAb levels faster, at lower cost, and with better efficiency. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 69 sera samples were collected for the research, 28 of which were from unvaccinated participants. The other 27 samples and the remaining 14 samples were from the participants who had received the first and second dose, respectively, of AZ vaccine 1 month before. With cPass assays (Genscript cPass nAb ELISA assay) used as a criterion standard and lateral flow immunoassay kit (Healgen Scientific – LFIA test kit) coupled with a spectrometer (LFIA+S) for checking each specimen, we aimed to detect the presence of neutralizing antibodies in sera and to confirm the relationship between the inhibition rate from cPass assays and the nAb index from the LFIA+S. RESULTS: Data analysis of the research were taken from the certified ELISA and LFIA+S, which indicated a high consistency (Pearson’s r=0.864; ICC=0.90138) between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: The dataset demonstrated that LFIA+S was affordable, had a strong correlation with results of the cPass nAbs detection kit, and has potential clinical applications, with an exclusive feature that allows non-experts to use it with ease. It is believed that the proposed platform can be promoted in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93448842022-08-15 A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies Chiu, Wei-Huai Kong, Wei-Yi Su, Yu-Jang Wen, Jyun-Wei Tsai, Ciao-Ming Hong, Chitsung Chen, Pang-Yen Ko, Cheng-Hao Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify nAb levels faster, at lower cost, and with better efficiency. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 69 sera samples were collected for the research, 28 of which were from unvaccinated participants. The other 27 samples and the remaining 14 samples were from the participants who had received the first and second dose, respectively, of AZ vaccine 1 month before. With cPass assays (Genscript cPass nAb ELISA assay) used as a criterion standard and lateral flow immunoassay kit (Healgen Scientific – LFIA test kit) coupled with a spectrometer (LFIA+S) for checking each specimen, we aimed to detect the presence of neutralizing antibodies in sera and to confirm the relationship between the inhibition rate from cPass assays and the nAb index from the LFIA+S. RESULTS: Data analysis of the research were taken from the certified ELISA and LFIA+S, which indicated a high consistency (Pearson’s r=0.864; ICC=0.90138) between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: The dataset demonstrated that LFIA+S was affordable, had a strong correlation with results of the cPass nAbs detection kit, and has potential clinical applications, with an exclusive feature that allows non-experts to use it with ease. It is believed that the proposed platform can be promoted in the near future. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9344884/ /pubmed/35340017 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.935812 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Chiu, Wei-Huai Kong, Wei-Yi Su, Yu-Jang Wen, Jyun-Wei Tsai, Ciao-Ming Hong, Chitsung Chen, Pang-Yen Ko, Cheng-Hao A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies |
title | A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies |
title_full | A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies |
title_fullStr | A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies |
title_short | A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies |
title_sort | faster, novel technique to detect covid-19 neutralizing antibodies |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340017 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.935812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiuweihuai afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT kongweiyi afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT suyujang afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT wenjyunwei afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT tsaiciaoming afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT hongchitsung afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT chenpangyen afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT kochenghao afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT chiuweihuai fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT kongweiyi fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT suyujang fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT wenjyunwei fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT tsaiciaoming fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT hongchitsung fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT chenpangyen fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies AT kochenghao fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies |