Cargando…

A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiu, Wei-Huai, Kong, Wei-Yi, Su, Yu-Jang, Wen, Jyun-Wei, Tsai, Ciao-Ming, Hong, Chitsung, Chen, Pang-Yen, Ko, Cheng-Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340017
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.935812
_version_ 1784761312768688128
author Chiu, Wei-Huai
Kong, Wei-Yi
Su, Yu-Jang
Wen, Jyun-Wei
Tsai, Ciao-Ming
Hong, Chitsung
Chen, Pang-Yen
Ko, Cheng-Hao
author_facet Chiu, Wei-Huai
Kong, Wei-Yi
Su, Yu-Jang
Wen, Jyun-Wei
Tsai, Ciao-Ming
Hong, Chitsung
Chen, Pang-Yen
Ko, Cheng-Hao
author_sort Chiu, Wei-Huai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify nAb levels faster, at lower cost, and with better efficiency. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 69 sera samples were collected for the research, 28 of which were from unvaccinated participants. The other 27 samples and the remaining 14 samples were from the participants who had received the first and second dose, respectively, of AZ vaccine 1 month before. With cPass assays (Genscript cPass nAb ELISA assay) used as a criterion standard and lateral flow immunoassay kit (Healgen Scientific – LFIA test kit) coupled with a spectrometer (LFIA+S) for checking each specimen, we aimed to detect the presence of neutralizing antibodies in sera and to confirm the relationship between the inhibition rate from cPass assays and the nAb index from the LFIA+S. RESULTS: Data analysis of the research were taken from the certified ELISA and LFIA+S, which indicated a high consistency (Pearson’s r=0.864; ICC=0.90138) between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: The dataset demonstrated that LFIA+S was affordable, had a strong correlation with results of the cPass nAbs detection kit, and has potential clinical applications, with an exclusive feature that allows non-experts to use it with ease. It is believed that the proposed platform can be promoted in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9344884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93448842022-08-15 A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies Chiu, Wei-Huai Kong, Wei-Yi Su, Yu-Jang Wen, Jyun-Wei Tsai, Ciao-Ming Hong, Chitsung Chen, Pang-Yen Ko, Cheng-Hao Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally in a short period of time. It is known that antibody (nAb) level can effectively predict vaccine efficacy, which leads to the exploration of vaccine trials for efficacy assessment. Thus, the current study aimed to develop a platform to quantify nAb levels faster, at lower cost, and with better efficiency. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 69 sera samples were collected for the research, 28 of which were from unvaccinated participants. The other 27 samples and the remaining 14 samples were from the participants who had received the first and second dose, respectively, of AZ vaccine 1 month before. With cPass assays (Genscript cPass nAb ELISA assay) used as a criterion standard and lateral flow immunoassay kit (Healgen Scientific – LFIA test kit) coupled with a spectrometer (LFIA+S) for checking each specimen, we aimed to detect the presence of neutralizing antibodies in sera and to confirm the relationship between the inhibition rate from cPass assays and the nAb index from the LFIA+S. RESULTS: Data analysis of the research were taken from the certified ELISA and LFIA+S, which indicated a high consistency (Pearson’s r=0.864; ICC=0.90138) between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: The dataset demonstrated that LFIA+S was affordable, had a strong correlation with results of the cPass nAbs detection kit, and has potential clinical applications, with an exclusive feature that allows non-experts to use it with ease. It is believed that the proposed platform can be promoted in the near future. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9344884/ /pubmed/35340017 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.935812 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Chiu, Wei-Huai
Kong, Wei-Yi
Su, Yu-Jang
Wen, Jyun-Wei
Tsai, Ciao-Ming
Hong, Chitsung
Chen, Pang-Yen
Ko, Cheng-Hao
A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies
title A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies
title_full A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies
title_fullStr A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies
title_full_unstemmed A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies
title_short A Faster, Novel Technique to Detect COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibodies
title_sort faster, novel technique to detect covid-19 neutralizing antibodies
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340017
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.935812
work_keys_str_mv AT chiuweihuai afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT kongweiyi afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT suyujang afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT wenjyunwei afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT tsaiciaoming afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT hongchitsung afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT chenpangyen afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT kochenghao afasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT chiuweihuai fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT kongweiyi fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT suyujang fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT wenjyunwei fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT tsaiciaoming fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT hongchitsung fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT chenpangyen fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies
AT kochenghao fasternoveltechniquetodetectcovid19neutralizingantibodies