Cargando…
Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety
Current standards for safe delivery of electrical stimulation to the central nervous system are based on foundational studies which examined post-mortem tissue for histological signs of damage. This set of observations and the subsequently proposed limits to safe stimulation, termed the “Shannon lim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.937923 |
_version_ | 1784761320207286272 |
---|---|
author | Whitsitt, Quentin A. Koo, Beomseo Celik, Mahmut Emin Evans, Blake M. Weiland, James D. Purcell, Erin K. |
author_facet | Whitsitt, Quentin A. Koo, Beomseo Celik, Mahmut Emin Evans, Blake M. Weiland, James D. Purcell, Erin K. |
author_sort | Whitsitt, Quentin A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current standards for safe delivery of electrical stimulation to the central nervous system are based on foundational studies which examined post-mortem tissue for histological signs of damage. This set of observations and the subsequently proposed limits to safe stimulation, termed the “Shannon limits,” allow for a simple calculation (using charge per phase and charge density) to determine the intensity of electrical stimulation that can be delivered safely to brain tissue. In the three decades since the Shannon limits were reported, advances in molecular biology have allowed for more nuanced and detailed approaches to be used to expand current understanding of the physiological effects of stimulation. Here, we demonstrate the use of spatial transcriptomics (ST) in an exploratory investigation to assess the biological response to electrical stimulation in the brain. Electrical stimulation was delivered to the rat visual cortex with either acute or chronic electrode implantation procedures. To explore the influence of device type and stimulation parameters, we used carbon fiber ultramicroelectrode arrays (7 μm diameter) and microwire electrode arrays (50 μm diameter) delivering charge and charge density levels selected above and below reported tissue damage thresholds (range: 2–20 nC, 0.1–1 mC/cm(2)). Spatial transcriptomics was performed using Visium Spatial Gene Expression Slides (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, United States), which enabled simultaneous immunohistochemistry and ST to directly compare traditional histological metrics to transcriptional profiles within each tissue sample. Our data give a first look at unique spatial patterns of gene expression that are related to cellular processes including inflammation, cell cycle progression, and neuronal plasticity. At the acute timepoint, an increase in inflammatory and plasticity related genes was observed surrounding a stimulating electrode compared to a craniotomy control. At the chronic timepoint, an increase in inflammatory and cell cycle progression related genes was observed both in the stimulating vs. non-stimulating microwire electrode comparison and in the stimulating microwire vs. carbon fiber comparison. Using the spatial aspect of this method as well as the within-sample link to traditional metrics of tissue damage, we demonstrate how these data may be analyzed and used to generate new hypotheses and inform safety standards for stimulation in cortex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9344921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93449212022-08-03 Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety Whitsitt, Quentin A. Koo, Beomseo Celik, Mahmut Emin Evans, Blake M. Weiland, James D. Purcell, Erin K. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Current standards for safe delivery of electrical stimulation to the central nervous system are based on foundational studies which examined post-mortem tissue for histological signs of damage. This set of observations and the subsequently proposed limits to safe stimulation, termed the “Shannon limits,” allow for a simple calculation (using charge per phase and charge density) to determine the intensity of electrical stimulation that can be delivered safely to brain tissue. In the three decades since the Shannon limits were reported, advances in molecular biology have allowed for more nuanced and detailed approaches to be used to expand current understanding of the physiological effects of stimulation. Here, we demonstrate the use of spatial transcriptomics (ST) in an exploratory investigation to assess the biological response to electrical stimulation in the brain. Electrical stimulation was delivered to the rat visual cortex with either acute or chronic electrode implantation procedures. To explore the influence of device type and stimulation parameters, we used carbon fiber ultramicroelectrode arrays (7 μm diameter) and microwire electrode arrays (50 μm diameter) delivering charge and charge density levels selected above and below reported tissue damage thresholds (range: 2–20 nC, 0.1–1 mC/cm(2)). Spatial transcriptomics was performed using Visium Spatial Gene Expression Slides (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, United States), which enabled simultaneous immunohistochemistry and ST to directly compare traditional histological metrics to transcriptional profiles within each tissue sample. Our data give a first look at unique spatial patterns of gene expression that are related to cellular processes including inflammation, cell cycle progression, and neuronal plasticity. At the acute timepoint, an increase in inflammatory and plasticity related genes was observed surrounding a stimulating electrode compared to a craniotomy control. At the chronic timepoint, an increase in inflammatory and cell cycle progression related genes was observed both in the stimulating vs. non-stimulating microwire electrode comparison and in the stimulating microwire vs. carbon fiber comparison. Using the spatial aspect of this method as well as the within-sample link to traditional metrics of tissue damage, we demonstrate how these data may be analyzed and used to generate new hypotheses and inform safety standards for stimulation in cortex. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9344921/ /pubmed/35928007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.937923 Text en Copyright © 2022 Whitsitt, Koo, Celik, Evans, Weiland and Purcell. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Whitsitt, Quentin A. Koo, Beomseo Celik, Mahmut Emin Evans, Blake M. Weiland, James D. Purcell, Erin K. Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety |
title | Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety |
title_full | Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety |
title_fullStr | Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety |
title_short | Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety |
title_sort | spatial transcriptomics as a novel approach to redefine electrical stimulation safety |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.937923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitsittquentina spatialtranscriptomicsasanovelapproachtoredefineelectricalstimulationsafety AT koobeomseo spatialtranscriptomicsasanovelapproachtoredefineelectricalstimulationsafety AT celikmahmutemin spatialtranscriptomicsasanovelapproachtoredefineelectricalstimulationsafety AT evansblakem spatialtranscriptomicsasanovelapproachtoredefineelectricalstimulationsafety AT weilandjamesd spatialtranscriptomicsasanovelapproachtoredefineelectricalstimulationsafety AT purcellerink spatialtranscriptomicsasanovelapproachtoredefineelectricalstimulationsafety |