Cargando…

Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy

BACKGROUND: Patients with self-reported antibiotic allergies have a higher cost of care, more frequent infections with resistant bacteria and worse health outcomes than patients without antibiotic allergies. Ultimately, less than 5% of patients who report a penicillin allergy have a clinically signi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gill, Margaret M, Gasner, Sara, Banken, Alisha, Park, Miguel, Weaver, Amy, Sharpe, Emily, Theiler, Regan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001859
_version_ 1784761343090360320
author Gill, Margaret M
Gasner, Sara
Banken, Alisha
Park, Miguel
Weaver, Amy
Sharpe, Emily
Theiler, Regan
author_facet Gill, Margaret M
Gasner, Sara
Banken, Alisha
Park, Miguel
Weaver, Amy
Sharpe, Emily
Theiler, Regan
author_sort Gill, Margaret M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with self-reported antibiotic allergies have a higher cost of care, more frequent infections with resistant bacteria and worse health outcomes than patients without antibiotic allergies. Ultimately, less than 5% of patients who report a penicillin allergy have a clinically significant immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction when tested. As 10%–30% of the population of pregnant patients are colonised for group B Streptococcus (GBS) and guidelines recommend penicillin as the treatment of choice for GBS, current recommendations support penicillin allergy testing in pregnant patients who report an allergy. METHODS AND INTERVENTION: In this quality improvement project, nursing staff used an algorithm outlining inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine which patients were eligible to have penicillin allergy testing completed. Penicillin allergy testing consisted of a skin test using benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G potassium, amoxicillin and alkaline hydrolysis mix (penicilloate) as a prick skin test, followed by intradermal skin test and finally an oral challenge with either amoxicillin or penicillin. Patient outcomes were analysed to evaluate the impact of the intervention. RESULTS: Of the 1266 patients receiving prenatal care during the intervention, 236 (19%) reported a history of penicillin allergy, and 212 if these were eligible for testing. 150 of the eligible patients were offered penicillin allergy testing. 101 patients (67%) completed testing and 49 (33%) declined testing. Seven patients (7%) had positive penicillin allergy testing, while 94 patients (93%) had negative penicillin allergy testing and were immediately de-labelled as penicillin allergic. Seventeen of the de-labelled patients subsequently tested positive for GBS colonisation, and all received intrapartum penicillin without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Pursuing penicillin allergy testing for pregnant patients with reported penicillin allergy is a safe and feasible approach, allowing for allergy de-labelling and safe, guideline-driven antimicrobial therapy during subsequent labour and delivery hospitalisations. Cost-effectiveness of the allergy testing and impact on later episodes of care should be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93450392022-08-19 Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy Gill, Margaret M Gasner, Sara Banken, Alisha Park, Miguel Weaver, Amy Sharpe, Emily Theiler, Regan BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with self-reported antibiotic allergies have a higher cost of care, more frequent infections with resistant bacteria and worse health outcomes than patients without antibiotic allergies. Ultimately, less than 5% of patients who report a penicillin allergy have a clinically significant immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction when tested. As 10%–30% of the population of pregnant patients are colonised for group B Streptococcus (GBS) and guidelines recommend penicillin as the treatment of choice for GBS, current recommendations support penicillin allergy testing in pregnant patients who report an allergy. METHODS AND INTERVENTION: In this quality improvement project, nursing staff used an algorithm outlining inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine which patients were eligible to have penicillin allergy testing completed. Penicillin allergy testing consisted of a skin test using benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G potassium, amoxicillin and alkaline hydrolysis mix (penicilloate) as a prick skin test, followed by intradermal skin test and finally an oral challenge with either amoxicillin or penicillin. Patient outcomes were analysed to evaluate the impact of the intervention. RESULTS: Of the 1266 patients receiving prenatal care during the intervention, 236 (19%) reported a history of penicillin allergy, and 212 if these were eligible for testing. 150 of the eligible patients were offered penicillin allergy testing. 101 patients (67%) completed testing and 49 (33%) declined testing. Seven patients (7%) had positive penicillin allergy testing, while 94 patients (93%) had negative penicillin allergy testing and were immediately de-labelled as penicillin allergic. Seventeen of the de-labelled patients subsequently tested positive for GBS colonisation, and all received intrapartum penicillin without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Pursuing penicillin allergy testing for pregnant patients with reported penicillin allergy is a safe and feasible approach, allowing for allergy de-labelling and safe, guideline-driven antimicrobial therapy during subsequent labour and delivery hospitalisations. Cost-effectiveness of the allergy testing and impact on later episodes of care should be further investigated. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9345039/ /pubmed/35906008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001859 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Gill, Margaret M
Gasner, Sara
Banken, Alisha
Park, Miguel
Weaver, Amy
Sharpe, Emily
Theiler, Regan
Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy
title Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy
title_full Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy
title_fullStr Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy
title_full_unstemmed Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy
title_short Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy
title_sort improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001859
work_keys_str_mv AT gillmargaretm improvingroutineprenatalpenicillinallergytestingforreportedpenicillinallergy
AT gasnersara improvingroutineprenatalpenicillinallergytestingforreportedpenicillinallergy
AT bankenalisha improvingroutineprenatalpenicillinallergytestingforreportedpenicillinallergy
AT parkmiguel improvingroutineprenatalpenicillinallergytestingforreportedpenicillinallergy
AT weaveramy improvingroutineprenatalpenicillinallergytestingforreportedpenicillinallergy
AT sharpeemily improvingroutineprenatalpenicillinallergytestingforreportedpenicillinallergy
AT theilerregan improvingroutineprenatalpenicillinallergytestingforreportedpenicillinallergy