Cargando…

Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions

OBJECTIVE: Women living in Pakistan have complex health problems including infectious and non-communicable diseases, accident and injuries, and mental health problems. While a majority of these women rely on primary healthcare services for all of their healthcare needs, there has to date been no ove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizvi Jafree, Sara, Mahmood, Qaisar Khalid, Sohail, Malik Muhammad, Asim, Muhammad, Barlow, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35914906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061644
_version_ 1784761350028787712
author Rizvi Jafree, Sara
Mahmood, Qaisar Khalid
Sohail, Malik Muhammad
Asim, Muhammad
Barlow, Jane
author_facet Rizvi Jafree, Sara
Mahmood, Qaisar Khalid
Sohail, Malik Muhammad
Asim, Muhammad
Barlow, Jane
author_sort Rizvi Jafree, Sara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Women living in Pakistan have complex health problems including infectious and non-communicable diseases, accident and injuries, and mental health problems. While a majority of these women rely on primary healthcare services for all of their healthcare needs, there has to date been no overview of the extent of their effectiveness. The objective of this review was to (1) synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of primary care based interventions aimed at improving women’s mental and physical health and (2) identify the factors that promote effectiveness for women’s health outcomes. METHODS: Five academic databases were searched, including PubMed, BMC Medicine, Medline, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. A search was also made of the grey literature. The quality of included studies was assessed using a standardised critical appraisal tool, and the findings summarised using a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: In total, 18 studies were included in the review. Eight involved evaluations of counselling interventions, three health education and awareness interventions, two social and psychosocial interventions, and five were evaluations of combination interventions. Twelve of the included studies were randomised controlled trials. Of these 14 reported significant outcomes, and 4 further interventions showed partially favourable results. However, interventions mostly targeted women’s mental or reproductive health. CONCLUSIONS: While the evidence is limited in terms of quality and what has been evaluated, a number of interventions appear to be effective in improving outcomes for women. The three key approaches include the adoption of an active door-to-door and group-based approach; utilisation of community peers who can deliver care cost-effectively and who are more accepted in the community; and the integration of financial vouchers to support uptake in poor populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203472.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93450692022-08-30 Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions Rizvi Jafree, Sara Mahmood, Qaisar Khalid Sohail, Malik Muhammad Asim, Muhammad Barlow, Jane BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Women living in Pakistan have complex health problems including infectious and non-communicable diseases, accident and injuries, and mental health problems. While a majority of these women rely on primary healthcare services for all of their healthcare needs, there has to date been no overview of the extent of their effectiveness. The objective of this review was to (1) synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of primary care based interventions aimed at improving women’s mental and physical health and (2) identify the factors that promote effectiveness for women’s health outcomes. METHODS: Five academic databases were searched, including PubMed, BMC Medicine, Medline, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. A search was also made of the grey literature. The quality of included studies was assessed using a standardised critical appraisal tool, and the findings summarised using a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: In total, 18 studies were included in the review. Eight involved evaluations of counselling interventions, three health education and awareness interventions, two social and psychosocial interventions, and five were evaluations of combination interventions. Twelve of the included studies were randomised controlled trials. Of these 14 reported significant outcomes, and 4 further interventions showed partially favourable results. However, interventions mostly targeted women’s mental or reproductive health. CONCLUSIONS: While the evidence is limited in terms of quality and what has been evaluated, a number of interventions appear to be effective in improving outcomes for women. The three key approaches include the adoption of an active door-to-door and group-based approach; utilisation of community peers who can deliver care cost-effectively and who are more accepted in the community; and the integration of financial vouchers to support uptake in poor populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203472. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9345069/ /pubmed/35914906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061644 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Rizvi Jafree, Sara
Mahmood, Qaisar Khalid
Sohail, Malik Muhammad
Asim, Muhammad
Barlow, Jane
Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions
title Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions
title_full Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions
title_fullStr Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions
title_full_unstemmed Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions
title_short Narrative synthesis systematic review of Pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions
title_sort narrative synthesis systematic review of pakistani women’s health outcomes from primary care interventions
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35914906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061644
work_keys_str_mv AT rizvijafreesara narrativesynthesissystematicreviewofpakistaniwomenshealthoutcomesfromprimarycareinterventions
AT mahmoodqaisarkhalid narrativesynthesissystematicreviewofpakistaniwomenshealthoutcomesfromprimarycareinterventions
AT sohailmalikmuhammad narrativesynthesissystematicreviewofpakistaniwomenshealthoutcomesfromprimarycareinterventions
AT asimmuhammad narrativesynthesissystematicreviewofpakistaniwomenshealthoutcomesfromprimarycareinterventions
AT barlowjane narrativesynthesissystematicreviewofpakistaniwomenshealthoutcomesfromprimarycareinterventions