Cargando…

A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion

OBJECTIVES: Fluids are one the most common specimens received in cytology laboratories. The presence of erythrocytes may obscure the cells in the smears, making the diagnosis, and identification of cells difficult. Many techniques are being used by laboratories to eliminate these erythrocytes. The p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inbasekaran, Poovizhi, Subramanian, Ramaswamy Anikode
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928534
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_14_2021
_version_ 1784761358503378944
author Inbasekaran, Poovizhi
Subramanian, Ramaswamy Anikode
author_facet Inbasekaran, Poovizhi
Subramanian, Ramaswamy Anikode
author_sort Inbasekaran, Poovizhi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Fluids are one the most common specimens received in cytology laboratories. The presence of erythrocytes may obscure the cells in the smears, making the diagnosis, and identification of cells difficult. Many techniques are being used by laboratories to eliminate these erythrocytes. The present study was undertaken to improve the quality of cytology smears of hemorrhagic samples by comparing three different techniques, namely, Carnoy’s fixative (CF), modified CF, and normal saline rehydration technique (NSRT) to hemolysis red blood cells (RBC) present in the smear background for better cytological assessment. The present study was a prospective study done over 1 year 6 months from November 2012 to March 2014, in the Department of Pathology in a Tertiary Care Rural Medical College. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All hemorrhagic effusions received in the department of pathology were processed using CF, modified CF, and NSRT. The background of the smear and cytomorphological details with two different stains was analyzed. The Chi-square test was used to find out the association of different techniques in the reduction of RBC. RESULTS: More than 60% reduction of RBCs in the smear was noted in 85.40%, 14.60%, and 15.60% by NSRT, modified CF, and CF, respectively. Staining was better and nuclear features were best preserved in NSRT. CONCLUSION: NSRT is the best, simple, and cheaper technique to lyse RBC in the hemorrhagic fluid. It also shows better staining and well-preserved cytomorphological features of the cell.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93451032022-08-03 A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion Inbasekaran, Poovizhi Subramanian, Ramaswamy Anikode Cytojournal Research Article OBJECTIVES: Fluids are one the most common specimens received in cytology laboratories. The presence of erythrocytes may obscure the cells in the smears, making the diagnosis, and identification of cells difficult. Many techniques are being used by laboratories to eliminate these erythrocytes. The present study was undertaken to improve the quality of cytology smears of hemorrhagic samples by comparing three different techniques, namely, Carnoy’s fixative (CF), modified CF, and normal saline rehydration technique (NSRT) to hemolysis red blood cells (RBC) present in the smear background for better cytological assessment. The present study was a prospective study done over 1 year 6 months from November 2012 to March 2014, in the Department of Pathology in a Tertiary Care Rural Medical College. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All hemorrhagic effusions received in the department of pathology were processed using CF, modified CF, and NSRT. The background of the smear and cytomorphological details with two different stains was analyzed. The Chi-square test was used to find out the association of different techniques in the reduction of RBC. RESULTS: More than 60% reduction of RBCs in the smear was noted in 85.40%, 14.60%, and 15.60% by NSRT, modified CF, and CF, respectively. Staining was better and nuclear features were best preserved in NSRT. CONCLUSION: NSRT is the best, simple, and cheaper technique to lyse RBC in the hemorrhagic fluid. It also shows better staining and well-preserved cytomorphological features of the cell. Scientific Scholar 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9345103/ /pubmed/35928534 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_14_2021 Text en © 2022 Cytopathology Foundation Inc, Published by Scientific Scholar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Inbasekaran, Poovizhi
Subramanian, Ramaswamy Anikode
A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion
title A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion
title_full A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion
title_fullStr A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion
title_short A comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion
title_sort comparative study of cytological processing techniques in hemorrhagic effusion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928534
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_14_2021
work_keys_str_mv AT inbasekaranpoovizhi acomparativestudyofcytologicalprocessingtechniquesinhemorrhagiceffusion
AT subramanianramaswamyanikode acomparativestudyofcytologicalprocessingtechniquesinhemorrhagiceffusion
AT inbasekaranpoovizhi comparativestudyofcytologicalprocessingtechniquesinhemorrhagiceffusion
AT subramanianramaswamyanikode comparativestudyofcytologicalprocessingtechniquesinhemorrhagiceffusion