Cargando…

Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of radiographic Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) following anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) typically ranges from 2-4%/year, reportedly fewer patients are symptomatic, and even fewer require secondary surgery. METHODS: Mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Epstein, Nancy E., Agulnick, Marc A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928322
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_541_2022
_version_ 1784761363995820032
author Epstein, Nancy E.
Agulnick, Marc A.
author_facet Epstein, Nancy E.
Agulnick, Marc A.
author_sort Epstein, Nancy E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of radiographic Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) following anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) typically ranges from 2-4%/year, reportedly fewer patients are symptomatic, and even fewer require secondary surgery. METHODS: Multiple studies have documented a 2-4% incidence of radiographic ASD following either ACDF or CDA per year. However, fewer are symptomatic from ASD, and even fewer require additional surgery/reoperations. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis (2016) involving 83 papers, the incidence of radiographic ASD per year was 2.79%, but symptomatic disease was present in just 1.43% of patients with only 0.24% requiring secondary surgery. In another study (2019) involving 38,149 patients undergoing ACDF, 2.9% (1092 patients; 0.62% per year) had radiographic ASD within an average of 4.66 postoperative years; the younger the patient at the index surgery, the higher the reoperation rate (i.e. < 40 years of age 4.56 X reoperations vs. <70 at 2.1 X reoperations). In a meta-analysis of 32 articles focusing on ASD 12–24 months following CDA, adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) occurred in 5.15% of patients, but adjacent segment disease (AS Dis) was noted in just 0.2%/ year. Further, AS degeneration occurred in 7.4% of patients after 1-level vs. 15.6% following 2 level fusions, confirming that CDA’s “motion-sparing” design did not produce the “anticipated” beneficial results. CONCLUSION: The incidence of radiographic ASD ranges from 2-4% per year for ACDF and CDA. Additionally, both demonstrate lesser frequencies of symptomatic ASD, and the need for secondary surgery. Further, doubling the frequency of ASD following 2 vs. 1-level CDA, should prompt surgeons to limit surgery to only essential levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93451262022-08-03 Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty Epstein, Nancy E. Agulnick, Marc A. Surg Neurol Int Review Article BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of radiographic Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) following anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) typically ranges from 2-4%/year, reportedly fewer patients are symptomatic, and even fewer require secondary surgery. METHODS: Multiple studies have documented a 2-4% incidence of radiographic ASD following either ACDF or CDA per year. However, fewer are symptomatic from ASD, and even fewer require additional surgery/reoperations. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis (2016) involving 83 papers, the incidence of radiographic ASD per year was 2.79%, but symptomatic disease was present in just 1.43% of patients with only 0.24% requiring secondary surgery. In another study (2019) involving 38,149 patients undergoing ACDF, 2.9% (1092 patients; 0.62% per year) had radiographic ASD within an average of 4.66 postoperative years; the younger the patient at the index surgery, the higher the reoperation rate (i.e. < 40 years of age 4.56 X reoperations vs. <70 at 2.1 X reoperations). In a meta-analysis of 32 articles focusing on ASD 12–24 months following CDA, adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) occurred in 5.15% of patients, but adjacent segment disease (AS Dis) was noted in just 0.2%/ year. Further, AS degeneration occurred in 7.4% of patients after 1-level vs. 15.6% following 2 level fusions, confirming that CDA’s “motion-sparing” design did not produce the “anticipated” beneficial results. CONCLUSION: The incidence of radiographic ASD ranges from 2-4% per year for ACDF and CDA. Additionally, both demonstrate lesser frequencies of symptomatic ASD, and the need for secondary surgery. Further, doubling the frequency of ASD following 2 vs. 1-level CDA, should prompt surgeons to limit surgery to only essential levels. Scientific Scholar 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9345126/ /pubmed/35928322 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_541_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Epstein, Nancy E.
Agulnick, Marc A.
Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty
title Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty
title_full Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty
title_short Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty
title_sort short review/perspective on adjacent segment disease (asd) following cervical fusion versus arthroplasty
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928322
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_541_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT epsteinnancye shortreviewperspectiveonadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdfollowingcervicalfusionversusarthroplasty
AT agulnickmarca shortreviewperspectiveonadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdfollowingcervicalfusionversusarthroplasty