Cargando…
Why compliance and driving pressure may be inappropriate targets for PEEP setting during ARDS
Autores principales: | Grieco, Domenico Luca, Bongiovanni, Filippo, Dell’Anna, Antonio M., Antonelli, Massimo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04109-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Higher PEEP in intubated COVID-19-associated ARDS patients? We are not sure
por: Yaroshetskiy, Andrey I., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Hemodynamic response to positive end-expiratory pressure and prone position in COVID-19 ARDS
por: Dell’Anna, Antonio Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Respiratory system compliance at the same PEEP level is similar in COVID and non-COVID ARDS
por: Fusina, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Tidal lung hysteresis to interpret PEEP-induced changes in compliance in ARDS patients
por: Mojoli, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Assessment of static compliance and estimated lung recruitment as a tool for PEEP setting in ARDS patients
por: Dostal, P, et al.
Publicado: (2001)