Cargando…

Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined. OBJECTIVE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Qingqing, Li, Hong, Liu, Yu, Mei, Haonan, Guo, Liying, Liu, Xianying, Tao, Xiaolin, Ma, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.918956
_version_ 1784761449347809280
author Zhao, Qingqing
Li, Hong
Liu, Yu
Mei, Haonan
Guo, Liying
Liu, Xianying
Tao, Xiaolin
Ma, Jiang
author_facet Zhao, Qingqing
Li, Hong
Liu, Yu
Mei, Haonan
Guo, Liying
Liu, Xianying
Tao, Xiaolin
Ma, Jiang
author_sort Zhao, Qingqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined MT and NIBS in the recovery of upper limb motor function in stroke patients. METHODS: The search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP until December 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MT or NIBS alone with the combination of NIBS and MT in improving upper extremity motor recovery after stroke were selected. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean differences (MD) or the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to the types of control group, the types of NIBS, stimulation timing and phase poststroke. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles, including 17 studies with 628 patients, were reviewed in the meta-analysis. In comparison with MT or NIBS alone, the combined group significantly improved body structure and function (MD = 5.97; 95% CI: 5.01–6.93; P < 0.05), activity levels (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI 0.61–1.02; P < 0.05). For cortical excitability, the motor evoked potential cortical latency (SMD = −1.05; 95% CI:−1.57–−0.52; P < 0.05) and the central motor conduction time (SMD=-1.31 95% CI:−2.02-−0.61; P < 0.05) of the combined group were significantly shortened. A non-significant homogeneous summary effect size was found for MEP amplitude (SMD = 0.47; 95%CI = −0.29 to 1.23; P = 0.23). Subgroup analysis showed that there is an interaction between the stimulation sequence and the combined treatment effect. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, in comparison to the control groups, MT combined with NIBS promoted the recovery of upper extremity motor function after stroke, which was reflected in the analysis of body structure and function, activity levels, and cortical excitability. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022304455.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93455052022-08-03 Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Zhao, Qingqing Li, Hong Liu, Yu Mei, Haonan Guo, Liying Liu, Xianying Tao, Xiaolin Ma, Jiang Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined MT and NIBS in the recovery of upper limb motor function in stroke patients. METHODS: The search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP until December 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MT or NIBS alone with the combination of NIBS and MT in improving upper extremity motor recovery after stroke were selected. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean differences (MD) or the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to the types of control group, the types of NIBS, stimulation timing and phase poststroke. RESULTS: A total of 12 articles, including 17 studies with 628 patients, were reviewed in the meta-analysis. In comparison with MT or NIBS alone, the combined group significantly improved body structure and function (MD = 5.97; 95% CI: 5.01–6.93; P < 0.05), activity levels (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI 0.61–1.02; P < 0.05). For cortical excitability, the motor evoked potential cortical latency (SMD = −1.05; 95% CI:−1.57–−0.52; P < 0.05) and the central motor conduction time (SMD=-1.31 95% CI:−2.02-−0.61; P < 0.05) of the combined group were significantly shortened. A non-significant homogeneous summary effect size was found for MEP amplitude (SMD = 0.47; 95%CI = −0.29 to 1.23; P = 0.23). Subgroup analysis showed that there is an interaction between the stimulation sequence and the combined treatment effect. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, in comparison to the control groups, MT combined with NIBS promoted the recovery of upper extremity motor function after stroke, which was reflected in the analysis of body structure and function, activity levels, and cortical excitability. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022304455. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9345505/ /pubmed/35928134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.918956 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhao, Li, Liu, Mei, Guo, Liu, Tao and Ma. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Zhao, Qingqing
Li, Hong
Liu, Yu
Mei, Haonan
Guo, Liying
Liu, Xianying
Tao, Xiaolin
Ma, Jiang
Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_short Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_sort non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.918956
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoqingqing noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT lihong noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT liuyu noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT meihaonan noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT guoliying noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT liuxianying noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT taoxiaolin noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT majiang noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials