Cargando…

A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical practices and hospital resource organization during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional survey. An electronic questionnaire was provided to emergency department and intensive care unit physicians attending COVID-19 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campos, Pedro Paulo Zanella do Amaral, de Souza, Guilherme Martins, Midega, Thais, Guimarães, Hélio Penna, Corrêa, Thiago Domingos, Cordioli, Ricardo Luiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35766660
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220005-en
_version_ 1784761465503219712
author Campos, Pedro Paulo Zanella do Amaral
de Souza, Guilherme Martins
Midega, Thais
Guimarães, Hélio Penna
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Cordioli, Ricardo Luiz
author_facet Campos, Pedro Paulo Zanella do Amaral
de Souza, Guilherme Martins
Midega, Thais
Guimarães, Hélio Penna
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Cordioli, Ricardo Luiz
author_sort Campos, Pedro Paulo Zanella do Amaral
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical practices and hospital resource organization during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional survey. An electronic questionnaire was provided to emergency department and intensive care unit physicians attending COVID-19 patients. The survey comprised four domains: characteristics of the participants, clinical practices, COVID-19 treatment protocols and hospital resource organization. RESULTS: Between May and June 2020, 284 participants [median (interquartile ranges) age 39 (33 - 47) years, 56.3% men] responded to the survey; 33% were intensivists, and 9% were emergency medicine specialists. Half of the respondents worked in public hospitals. Noninvasive ventilation (89% versus 73%; p = 0.001) and highflow nasal cannula (49% versus 32%; p = 0.005) were reported to be more commonly available in private hospitals than in public hospitals. Mechanical ventilation was more commonly used in public hospitals than private hospitals (70% versus 50%; p = 0,024). In the Emergency Departments, positive endexpiratory pressure was most commonly adjusted according to SpO(2,) while in the intensive care units, positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted according to the best lung compliance. In the Emergency Departments, 25% of the respondents did not know how to set positive end-expiratory pressure. Compared to private hospitals, public hospitals had a lower availability of protocols for personal protection equipment during tracheal intubation (82% versus 94%; p = 0.005), managing mechanical ventilation [64% versus 75%; p = 0.006] and weaning patients from mechanical ventilation [34% versus 54%; p = 0.002]. Finally, patients spent less time in the emergency department before being transferred to the intensive care unit in private hospitals than in public hospitals [2 (1 - 3) versus 5 (2 - 24) hours; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This survey revealed significant heterogeneity in the organization of hospital resources, clinical practices and treatments among physicians during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93455842022-08-03 A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil Campos, Pedro Paulo Zanella do Amaral de Souza, Guilherme Martins Midega, Thais Guimarães, Hélio Penna Corrêa, Thiago Domingos Cordioli, Ricardo Luiz Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical practices and hospital resource organization during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional survey. An electronic questionnaire was provided to emergency department and intensive care unit physicians attending COVID-19 patients. The survey comprised four domains: characteristics of the participants, clinical practices, COVID-19 treatment protocols and hospital resource organization. RESULTS: Between May and June 2020, 284 participants [median (interquartile ranges) age 39 (33 - 47) years, 56.3% men] responded to the survey; 33% were intensivists, and 9% were emergency medicine specialists. Half of the respondents worked in public hospitals. Noninvasive ventilation (89% versus 73%; p = 0.001) and highflow nasal cannula (49% versus 32%; p = 0.005) were reported to be more commonly available in private hospitals than in public hospitals. Mechanical ventilation was more commonly used in public hospitals than private hospitals (70% versus 50%; p = 0,024). In the Emergency Departments, positive endexpiratory pressure was most commonly adjusted according to SpO(2,) while in the intensive care units, positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted according to the best lung compliance. In the Emergency Departments, 25% of the respondents did not know how to set positive end-expiratory pressure. Compared to private hospitals, public hospitals had a lower availability of protocols for personal protection equipment during tracheal intubation (82% versus 94%; p = 0.005), managing mechanical ventilation [64% versus 75%; p = 0.006] and weaning patients from mechanical ventilation [34% versus 54%; p = 0.002]. Finally, patients spent less time in the emergency department before being transferred to the intensive care unit in private hospitals than in public hospitals [2 (1 - 3) versus 5 (2 - 24) hours; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This survey revealed significant heterogeneity in the organization of hospital resources, clinical practices and treatments among physicians during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9345584/ /pubmed/35766660 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220005-en Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Campos, Pedro Paulo Zanella do Amaral
de Souza, Guilherme Martins
Midega, Thais
Guimarães, Hélio Penna
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Cordioli, Ricardo Luiz
A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
title A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
title_full A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
title_fullStr A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
title_short A nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
title_sort nationwide survey on health resources and clinical practices during the early covid-19 pandemic in brazil
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35766660
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220005-en
work_keys_str_mv AT campospedropaulozanelladoamaral anationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT desouzaguilhermemartins anationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT midegathais anationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT guimaraesheliopenna anationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT correathiagodomingos anationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT cordioliricardoluiz anationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT campospedropaulozanelladoamaral nationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT desouzaguilhermemartins nationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT midegathais nationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT guimaraesheliopenna nationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT correathiagodomingos nationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil
AT cordioliricardoluiz nationwidesurveyonhealthresourcesandclinicalpracticesduringtheearlycovid19pandemicinbrazil