Cargando…

Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes

Bioethanol industries and bioprocesses have many challenges that constantly impede commercialization of the end product. One of the bottlenecks in the bioethanol industry is the challenge of discovering highly efficient catalysts that can improve biomass conversion. The current promising bioethanol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranganathan, Shrivaishnavi, Mahesh, Sankar, Suresh, Sruthi, Nagarajan, Ayshwarya, Z. Sen, Taner, M.Yennamalli, Ragothaman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2085541
_version_ 1784761470191403008
author Ranganathan, Shrivaishnavi
Mahesh, Sankar
Suresh, Sruthi
Nagarajan, Ayshwarya
Z. Sen, Taner
M.Yennamalli, Ragothaman
author_facet Ranganathan, Shrivaishnavi
Mahesh, Sankar
Suresh, Sruthi
Nagarajan, Ayshwarya
Z. Sen, Taner
M.Yennamalli, Ragothaman
author_sort Ranganathan, Shrivaishnavi
collection PubMed
description Bioethanol industries and bioprocesses have many challenges that constantly impede commercialization of the end product. One of the bottlenecks in the bioethanol industry is the challenge of discovering highly efficient catalysts that can improve biomass conversion. The current promising bioethanol conversion catalysts are microorganism-based cellulolytic enzymes, but lack optimization for high bioethanol conversion, due to biological and other factors. A better understanding of molecular underpinnings of cellulolytic enzyme mechanisms and significant ways to improve them can accelerate the bioethanol commercial production process. In order to do this, experimental methods are the primary choice to evaluate and characterize cellulase’s properties, but they are time-consuming and expensive. A time-saving, complementary approach involves computational methods that evaluate the same properties and improves our atomistic-level understanding of enzymatic mechanism of action. Theoretical methods in many cases have proposed research routes for subsequent experimental testing and validation, reducing the overall research cost. Having a plethora of tools to evaluate cellulases and the yield of the enzymatic process will aid in planning more optimized experimental setups. Thus, there is a need to connect the computational evaluation methods with the experimental methods to overcome the bottlenecks in the bioethanol industry. This review discusses various experimental and computational methods and their use in evaluating the multiple properties of cellulases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93456202022-08-03 Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes Ranganathan, Shrivaishnavi Mahesh, Sankar Suresh, Sruthi Nagarajan, Ayshwarya Z. Sen, Taner M.Yennamalli, Ragothaman Bioengineered Review Bioethanol industries and bioprocesses have many challenges that constantly impede commercialization of the end product. One of the bottlenecks in the bioethanol industry is the challenge of discovering highly efficient catalysts that can improve biomass conversion. The current promising bioethanol conversion catalysts are microorganism-based cellulolytic enzymes, but lack optimization for high bioethanol conversion, due to biological and other factors. A better understanding of molecular underpinnings of cellulolytic enzyme mechanisms and significant ways to improve them can accelerate the bioethanol commercial production process. In order to do this, experimental methods are the primary choice to evaluate and characterize cellulase’s properties, but they are time-consuming and expensive. A time-saving, complementary approach involves computational methods that evaluate the same properties and improves our atomistic-level understanding of enzymatic mechanism of action. Theoretical methods in many cases have proposed research routes for subsequent experimental testing and validation, reducing the overall research cost. Having a plethora of tools to evaluate cellulases and the yield of the enzymatic process will aid in planning more optimized experimental setups. Thus, there is a need to connect the computational evaluation methods with the experimental methods to overcome the bottlenecks in the bioethanol industry. This review discusses various experimental and computational methods and their use in evaluating the multiple properties of cellulases. Taylor & Francis 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9345620/ /pubmed/35730402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2085541 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ranganathan, Shrivaishnavi
Mahesh, Sankar
Suresh, Sruthi
Nagarajan, Ayshwarya
Z. Sen, Taner
M.Yennamalli, Ragothaman
Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes
title Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes
title_full Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes
title_fullStr Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes
title_full_unstemmed Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes
title_short Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes
title_sort experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2085541
work_keys_str_mv AT ranganathanshrivaishnavi experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofcellulasesasbioethanolenzymes
AT maheshsankar experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofcellulasesasbioethanolenzymes
AT sureshsruthi experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofcellulasesasbioethanolenzymes
AT nagarajanayshwarya experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofcellulasesasbioethanolenzymes
AT zsentaner experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofcellulasesasbioethanolenzymes
AT myennamalliragothaman experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofcellulasesasbioethanolenzymes