Cargando…
A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers
Introduction Peptic ulcer disease continues to be a major public health in most developing countries despite the advances in medical management. The incidence of perforations remains high and has the highest mortality rate of any complication of ulcer disease. Risk stratification of cases will lead...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743526 |
_version_ | 1784761482942087168 |
---|---|
author | Koranne, Aboli Byakodi, K G. Teggimani, Vasant Kamat, Vijay V. Hiregoudar, Abhijith |
author_facet | Koranne, Aboli Byakodi, K G. Teggimani, Vasant Kamat, Vijay V. Hiregoudar, Abhijith |
author_sort | Koranne, Aboli |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Peptic ulcer disease continues to be a major public health in most developing countries despite the advances in medical management. The incidence of perforations remains high and has the highest mortality rate of any complication of ulcer disease. Risk stratification of cases will lead to better preoperative management and efficient utilization of intensive care unit resources. The purpose of the present study is to compare different existing scoring systems and identify the most accurate predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) cases. Materials and Methods This is an observational study conducted in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, India. All cases of PPU disease admitted from December 2017 to August 2019 who were treated surgically were included in the study. Demographic data were collected and peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and Jabalpur score (JS) were calculated for individual patient and compared. The patient was followed up during the postoperative period. Observation A total of 45 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 42.5 years. Most of the patients presented with 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was noted in 8.9% patients, and steroid use was present in 2.2% patients. Of the 45 patients, 7 deaths were reported. Between the various scoring systems, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality with a p -value of <0.001 and 0.007, respectively. In contrast, the PULP and ASA scores had p -value not statistically significant. However, the PULP score was a better predictor of postoperative complication with a p -value of 0.047. Conclusion Of the four scoring systems validated, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality in the given population. PULP score is a better predictor of postoperative complications in the present study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9345676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93456762022-08-03 A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers Koranne, Aboli Byakodi, K G. Teggimani, Vasant Kamat, Vijay V. Hiregoudar, Abhijith Surg J (N Y) Introduction Peptic ulcer disease continues to be a major public health in most developing countries despite the advances in medical management. The incidence of perforations remains high and has the highest mortality rate of any complication of ulcer disease. Risk stratification of cases will lead to better preoperative management and efficient utilization of intensive care unit resources. The purpose of the present study is to compare different existing scoring systems and identify the most accurate predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) cases. Materials and Methods This is an observational study conducted in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, India. All cases of PPU disease admitted from December 2017 to August 2019 who were treated surgically were included in the study. Demographic data were collected and peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and Jabalpur score (JS) were calculated for individual patient and compared. The patient was followed up during the postoperative period. Observation A total of 45 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 42.5 years. Most of the patients presented with 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was noted in 8.9% patients, and steroid use was present in 2.2% patients. Of the 45 patients, 7 deaths were reported. Between the various scoring systems, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality with a p -value of <0.001 and 0.007, respectively. In contrast, the PULP and ASA scores had p -value not statistically significant. However, the PULP score was a better predictor of postoperative complication with a p -value of 0.047. Conclusion Of the four scoring systems validated, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality in the given population. PULP score is a better predictor of postoperative complications in the present study. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9345676/ /pubmed/35928546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743526 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Koranne, Aboli Byakodi, K G. Teggimani, Vasant Kamat, Vijay V. Hiregoudar, Abhijith A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers |
title | A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers |
title_full | A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers |
title_short | A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers |
title_sort | comparative study between peptic ulcer perforation score, mannheim peritonitis index, asa score, and jabalpur score in predicting the mortality in perforated peptic ulcers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koranneaboli acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT byakodikg acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT teggimanivasant acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT kamatvijayv acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT hiregoudarabhijith acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT koranneaboli comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT byakodikg comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT teggimanivasant comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT kamatvijayv comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers AT hiregoudarabhijith comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers |