Cargando…

A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers

Introduction  Peptic ulcer disease continues to be a major public health in most developing countries despite the advances in medical management. The incidence of perforations remains high and has the highest mortality rate of any complication of ulcer disease. Risk stratification of cases will lead...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koranne, Aboli, Byakodi, K G., Teggimani, Vasant, Kamat, Vijay V., Hiregoudar, Abhijith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743526
_version_ 1784761482942087168
author Koranne, Aboli
Byakodi, K G.
Teggimani, Vasant
Kamat, Vijay V.
Hiregoudar, Abhijith
author_facet Koranne, Aboli
Byakodi, K G.
Teggimani, Vasant
Kamat, Vijay V.
Hiregoudar, Abhijith
author_sort Koranne, Aboli
collection PubMed
description Introduction  Peptic ulcer disease continues to be a major public health in most developing countries despite the advances in medical management. The incidence of perforations remains high and has the highest mortality rate of any complication of ulcer disease. Risk stratification of cases will lead to better preoperative management and efficient utilization of intensive care unit resources. The purpose of the present study is to compare different existing scoring systems and identify the most accurate predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) cases. Materials and Methods  This is an observational study conducted in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, India. All cases of PPU disease admitted from December 2017 to August 2019 who were treated surgically were included in the study. Demographic data were collected and peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and Jabalpur score (JS) were calculated for individual patient and compared. The patient was followed up during the postoperative period. Observation  A total of 45 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 42.5 years. Most of the patients presented with 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was noted in 8.9% patients, and steroid use was present in 2.2% patients. Of the 45 patients, 7 deaths were reported. Between the various scoring systems, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality with a p -value of <0.001 and 0.007, respectively. In contrast, the PULP and ASA scores had p -value not statistically significant. However, the PULP score was a better predictor of postoperative complication with a p -value of 0.047. Conclusion  Of the four scoring systems validated, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality in the given population. PULP score is a better predictor of postoperative complications in the present study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93456762022-08-03 A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers Koranne, Aboli Byakodi, K G. Teggimani, Vasant Kamat, Vijay V. Hiregoudar, Abhijith Surg J (N Y) Introduction  Peptic ulcer disease continues to be a major public health in most developing countries despite the advances in medical management. The incidence of perforations remains high and has the highest mortality rate of any complication of ulcer disease. Risk stratification of cases will lead to better preoperative management and efficient utilization of intensive care unit resources. The purpose of the present study is to compare different existing scoring systems and identify the most accurate predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) cases. Materials and Methods  This is an observational study conducted in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, India. All cases of PPU disease admitted from December 2017 to August 2019 who were treated surgically were included in the study. Demographic data were collected and peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and Jabalpur score (JS) were calculated for individual patient and compared. The patient was followed up during the postoperative period. Observation  A total of 45 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 42.5 years. Most of the patients presented with 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was noted in 8.9% patients, and steroid use was present in 2.2% patients. Of the 45 patients, 7 deaths were reported. Between the various scoring systems, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality with a p -value of <0.001 and 0.007, respectively. In contrast, the PULP and ASA scores had p -value not statistically significant. However, the PULP score was a better predictor of postoperative complication with a p -value of 0.047. Conclusion  Of the four scoring systems validated, the MPI and JS were better predictors of mortality in the given population. PULP score is a better predictor of postoperative complications in the present study. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9345676/ /pubmed/35928546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743526 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Koranne, Aboli
Byakodi, K G.
Teggimani, Vasant
Kamat, Vijay V.
Hiregoudar, Abhijith
A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers
title A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers
title_full A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers
title_fullStr A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers
title_short A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers
title_sort comparative study between peptic ulcer perforation score, mannheim peritonitis index, asa score, and jabalpur score in predicting the mortality in perforated peptic ulcers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743526
work_keys_str_mv AT koranneaboli acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT byakodikg acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT teggimanivasant acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT kamatvijayv acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT hiregoudarabhijith acomparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT koranneaboli comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT byakodikg comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT teggimanivasant comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT kamatvijayv comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers
AT hiregoudarabhijith comparativestudybetweenpepticulcerperforationscoremannheimperitonitisindexasascoreandjabalpurscoreinpredictingthemortalityinperforatedpepticulcers