Cargando…

Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022

OBJECTIVE: To describe effectiveness of mRNA vaccines by comparing 2-dose (2D) and 3-dose (3D) healthcare worker (HCW) recipients in the setting of Omicron variant dominance. Performance of 2D and 3D vaccine series against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the clinical outcomes of HCWs may inform return-to-wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robilotti, Elizabeth V., Whiting, Karissa, Lucca, Anabella, Poon, Chester, Jani, Krupa, McMillen, Tracy, Freeswick, Scott, Korenstein, Deborah, Babady, N. Esther, Seshan, Venkatraman E., Kamboj, Mini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35931373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.017
_version_ 1784761509348376576
author Robilotti, Elizabeth V.
Whiting, Karissa
Lucca, Anabella
Poon, Chester
Jani, Krupa
McMillen, Tracy
Freeswick, Scott
Korenstein, Deborah
Babady, N. Esther
Seshan, Venkatraman E.
Kamboj, Mini
author_facet Robilotti, Elizabeth V.
Whiting, Karissa
Lucca, Anabella
Poon, Chester
Jani, Krupa
McMillen, Tracy
Freeswick, Scott
Korenstein, Deborah
Babady, N. Esther
Seshan, Venkatraman E.
Kamboj, Mini
author_sort Robilotti, Elizabeth V.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe effectiveness of mRNA vaccines by comparing 2-dose (2D) and 3-dose (3D) healthcare worker (HCW) recipients in the setting of Omicron variant dominance. Performance of 2D and 3D vaccine series against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the clinical outcomes of HCWs may inform return-to-work guidance. METHODS: In a retrospective study from December 15, 2020 to January 15, 2022, SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCWs at a large tertiary cancer centre in New York City were examined to estimate infection rates (aggregated positive tests / person-days) and 95% CIs over the Omicron period in 3D and 2D mRNA vaccinated HCWs and were compared using rate ratios. We described the clinical features of post-vaccine infections and impact of prior (pre-Omicron) COVID infection on vaccine effectiveness. RESULTS: Among the 20857 HCWs in our cohort, 20,660 completed the 2D series with an mRNA vaccine during our study period and 12461 had received a third dose by January 15, 2022. The infection rate ratio for 3D versus 2D vaccinated HCWs was 0.667 (95% CI 0.623, 0.713) for an estimated 3D vaccine effectiveness of 33.3% compared to two doses only during the Omicron dominant period from December 15, 2021 to January 15, 2022. Breakthrough Omicron infections after 3D + 14 days occurred in 1,315 HCWs. Omicron infections were mild, with 16% of 3D and 11% 2D HCWs being asymptomatic. DISCUSSION: Study demonstrates improved vaccine-derived protection against COVID-19 infection in 3D versus 2D mRNA vaccinees during the Omicron surge. The advantage of 3D vaccination was maintained irrespective of prior COVID-19 infection status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93457902022-08-03 Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022 Robilotti, Elizabeth V. Whiting, Karissa Lucca, Anabella Poon, Chester Jani, Krupa McMillen, Tracy Freeswick, Scott Korenstein, Deborah Babady, N. Esther Seshan, Venkatraman E. Kamboj, Mini Clin Microbiol Infect Original Article OBJECTIVE: To describe effectiveness of mRNA vaccines by comparing 2-dose (2D) and 3-dose (3D) healthcare worker (HCW) recipients in the setting of Omicron variant dominance. Performance of 2D and 3D vaccine series against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the clinical outcomes of HCWs may inform return-to-work guidance. METHODS: In a retrospective study from December 15, 2020 to January 15, 2022, SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCWs at a large tertiary cancer centre in New York City were examined to estimate infection rates (aggregated positive tests / person-days) and 95% CIs over the Omicron period in 3D and 2D mRNA vaccinated HCWs and were compared using rate ratios. We described the clinical features of post-vaccine infections and impact of prior (pre-Omicron) COVID infection on vaccine effectiveness. RESULTS: Among the 20857 HCWs in our cohort, 20,660 completed the 2D series with an mRNA vaccine during our study period and 12461 had received a third dose by January 15, 2022. The infection rate ratio for 3D versus 2D vaccinated HCWs was 0.667 (95% CI 0.623, 0.713) for an estimated 3D vaccine effectiveness of 33.3% compared to two doses only during the Omicron dominant period from December 15, 2021 to January 15, 2022. Breakthrough Omicron infections after 3D + 14 days occurred in 1,315 HCWs. Omicron infections were mild, with 16% of 3D and 11% 2D HCWs being asymptomatic. DISCUSSION: Study demonstrates improved vaccine-derived protection against COVID-19 infection in 3D versus 2D mRNA vaccinees during the Omicron surge. The advantage of 3D vaccination was maintained irrespective of prior COVID-19 infection status. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-12 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9345790/ /pubmed/35931373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.017 Text en © 2022 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Robilotti, Elizabeth V.
Whiting, Karissa
Lucca, Anabella
Poon, Chester
Jani, Krupa
McMillen, Tracy
Freeswick, Scott
Korenstein, Deborah
Babady, N. Esther
Seshan, Venkatraman E.
Kamboj, Mini
Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022
title Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022
title_full Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022
title_fullStr Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022
title_short Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022
title_sort effectiveness of mrna booster vaccine among healthcare workers in new york city during the omicron surge, december 2021 to january 2022
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35931373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.017
work_keys_str_mv AT robilottielizabethv effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT whitingkarissa effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT luccaanabella effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT poonchester effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT janikrupa effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT mcmillentracy effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT freeswickscott effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT korensteindeborah effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT babadynesther effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT seshanvenkatramane effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022
AT kambojmini effectivenessofmrnaboostervaccineamonghealthcareworkersinnewyorkcityduringtheomicronsurgedecember2021tojanuary2022