Cargando…

Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND: Patient motion is a common problem during cardiac PET. The purpose of the present study was to investigate to what extent motions influence the quantitative accuracy of cardiac (15)O-water PET/CT and to develop a method for automated motion detection. METHOD: Frequency and magnitude of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordström, Jonny, Harms, Hendrik J., Kero, Tanja, Sörensen, Jens, Lubberink, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02550-9
_version_ 1784761511319699456
author Nordström, Jonny
Harms, Hendrik J.
Kero, Tanja
Sörensen, Jens
Lubberink, Mark
author_facet Nordström, Jonny
Harms, Hendrik J.
Kero, Tanja
Sörensen, Jens
Lubberink, Mark
author_sort Nordström, Jonny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient motion is a common problem during cardiac PET. The purpose of the present study was to investigate to what extent motions influence the quantitative accuracy of cardiac (15)O-water PET/CT and to develop a method for automated motion detection. METHOD: Frequency and magnitude of motion was assessed visually using data from 50 clinical (15)O-water PET/CT scans. Simulations of 4 types of motions with amplitude of 5 to 20 mm were performed based on data from 10 scans. An automated motion detection algorithm was evaluated on clinical and simulated motion data. MBF and PTF of all simulated scans were compared to the original scan used as reference. RESULTS: Patient motion was detected in 68% of clinical cases by visual inspection. All observed motions were small with amplitudes less than half the LV wall thickness. A clear pattern of motion influence was seen in the simulations with a decrease of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in the region of myocardium to where the motion was directed. The perfusable tissue fraction (PTF) trended in the opposite direction. Global absolute average deviation of MBF was 3.1% ± 1.8% and 7.3% ± 6.3% for motions with maximum amplitudes of 5 and 20 mm, respectively. Automated motion detection showed a sensitivity of 90% for simulated motions ≥ 10 mm but struggled with the smaller (≤ 5 mm) simulated (sensitivity 45%) and clinical motions (accuracy 48%). CONCLUSION: Patient motion can impair the quantitative accuracy of MBF. However, at typically occurring levels of patient motion, effects are similar to or only slightly larger than inter-observer variability, and downstream clinical effects are likely negligible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12350-021-02550-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9345798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93457982022-08-04 Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography Nordström, Jonny Harms, Hendrik J. Kero, Tanja Sörensen, Jens Lubberink, Mark J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient motion is a common problem during cardiac PET. The purpose of the present study was to investigate to what extent motions influence the quantitative accuracy of cardiac (15)O-water PET/CT and to develop a method for automated motion detection. METHOD: Frequency and magnitude of motion was assessed visually using data from 50 clinical (15)O-water PET/CT scans. Simulations of 4 types of motions with amplitude of 5 to 20 mm were performed based on data from 10 scans. An automated motion detection algorithm was evaluated on clinical and simulated motion data. MBF and PTF of all simulated scans were compared to the original scan used as reference. RESULTS: Patient motion was detected in 68% of clinical cases by visual inspection. All observed motions were small with amplitudes less than half the LV wall thickness. A clear pattern of motion influence was seen in the simulations with a decrease of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in the region of myocardium to where the motion was directed. The perfusable tissue fraction (PTF) trended in the opposite direction. Global absolute average deviation of MBF was 3.1% ± 1.8% and 7.3% ± 6.3% for motions with maximum amplitudes of 5 and 20 mm, respectively. Automated motion detection showed a sensitivity of 90% for simulated motions ≥ 10 mm but struggled with the smaller (≤ 5 mm) simulated (sensitivity 45%) and clinical motions (accuracy 48%). CONCLUSION: Patient motion can impair the quantitative accuracy of MBF. However, at typically occurring levels of patient motion, effects are similar to or only slightly larger than inter-observer variability, and downstream clinical effects are likely negligible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12350-021-02550-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9345798/ /pubmed/33655448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02550-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Nordström, Jonny
Harms, Hendrik J.
Kero, Tanja
Sörensen, Jens
Lubberink, Mark
Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_full Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_fullStr Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_full_unstemmed Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_short Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)O-water positron emission tomography
title_sort influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac (15)o-water positron emission tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02550-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nordstromjonny influenceofpatientmotiononquantitativeaccuracyincardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT harmshendrikj influenceofpatientmotiononquantitativeaccuracyincardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT kerotanja influenceofpatientmotiononquantitativeaccuracyincardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT sorensenjens influenceofpatientmotiononquantitativeaccuracyincardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography
AT lubberinkmark influenceofpatientmotiononquantitativeaccuracyincardiac15owaterpositronemissiontomography