Cargando…
Chinese contribution to NEJM, Lancet, JAMA, and BMJ from 2011 to 2020: a 10-year bibliometric study
BACKGROUND: New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and British Medical Journal (BMJ) are collectively known as “the Top Four Medical Journals (TFMJ)” in China. Through the analysis of Chinese scholars’ publications in the TFMJ in the recen...
Autores principales: | Wu, Jinlin, Li, Huili, Huang, Yan, Tong, Guang, Tian, Miao, Wu, Yanfen, Yu, Changjiang, Yang, Jue, Fan, Ruixin, Sun, Tucheng, Li, Xin, Zhuang, Jian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928742 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6793 |
Ejemplares similares
-
National citation patterns of NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA and The BMJ in the lay press: a quantitative content analysis
por: Casino, Gonzalo, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
An editorial perspective on the infamous COVID-19 studies retracted by Lancet and NEJM
por: Sengupta, Sabyasachi
Publicado: (2020) -
Comments on: An editorial perspective on the infamous COVID-19 studies retracted by Lancet and NEJM
por: Narayan, Smita
Publicado: (2021) -
Early and midterm results of valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction with a bovine pericardium patch for patients with acute type a aortic dissection
por: Yang, Jue, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Is Partially Thrombosed False Lumen Really a Predictor for Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis?
por: Wu, Jinlin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)