Cargando…
Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to analyze whether or not artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets are implemented in current clinical anesthetic practice, and to describe the current state of the research in the field. AI is a general term which refers to all the t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928743 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-7031 |
_version_ | 1784761779163758592 |
---|---|
author | Bellini, Valentina Rafano Carnà, Emanuele Russo, Michele Di Vincenzo, Fabiola Berghenti, Matteo Baciarello, Marco Bignami, Elena |
author_facet | Bellini, Valentina Rafano Carnà, Emanuele Russo, Michele Di Vincenzo, Fabiola Berghenti, Matteo Baciarello, Marco Bignami, Elena |
author_sort | Bellini, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to analyze whether or not artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets are implemented in current clinical anesthetic practice, and to describe the current state of the research in the field. AI is a general term which refers to all the techniques that enable computers to mimic human intelligence. AI is based on algorithms that gives machines the ability to reason and perform functions such as problem-solving, object and word recognition, inference of world states, and decision-making. It includes machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature on Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The research string comprised various combinations of “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “anesthesia”, “anesthesiology”. The databases were searched independently by two authors. A third reviewer would mediate any disagreement the results of the two screeners. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The application of AI has shown excellent results in both anesthesia and in operating room (OR) management. In each phase of the perioperative process, pre-, intra- and postoperative ones, it is able to perform different and specific tasks, using various techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to the use of these new technologies, even anesthesia, as it is happening for other disciplines, is going through a real revolution, called Anesthesia 4.0. However, AI is not free from limitations and open issues. Unfortunately, the models created, provided they have excellent performance, have not yet entered daily practice. Clinical impact analyzes and external validations are needed before this happens. Therefore, qualitative research will be needed to better understand the ethical, cultural, and societal implications of integrating AI into clinical workflows. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9347047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93470472022-08-03 Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review Bellini, Valentina Rafano Carnà, Emanuele Russo, Michele Di Vincenzo, Fabiola Berghenti, Matteo Baciarello, Marco Bignami, Elena Ann Transl Med Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to analyze whether or not artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets are implemented in current clinical anesthetic practice, and to describe the current state of the research in the field. AI is a general term which refers to all the techniques that enable computers to mimic human intelligence. AI is based on algorithms that gives machines the ability to reason and perform functions such as problem-solving, object and word recognition, inference of world states, and decision-making. It includes machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature on Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The research string comprised various combinations of “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “anesthesia”, “anesthesiology”. The databases were searched independently by two authors. A third reviewer would mediate any disagreement the results of the two screeners. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The application of AI has shown excellent results in both anesthesia and in operating room (OR) management. In each phase of the perioperative process, pre-, intra- and postoperative ones, it is able to perform different and specific tasks, using various techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to the use of these new technologies, even anesthesia, as it is happening for other disciplines, is going through a real revolution, called Anesthesia 4.0. However, AI is not free from limitations and open issues. Unfortunately, the models created, provided they have excellent performance, have not yet entered daily practice. Clinical impact analyzes and external validations are needed before this happens. Therefore, qualitative research will be needed to better understand the ethical, cultural, and societal implications of integrating AI into clinical workflows. AME Publishing Company 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9347047/ /pubmed/35928743 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-7031 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bellini, Valentina Rafano Carnà, Emanuele Russo, Michele Di Vincenzo, Fabiola Berghenti, Matteo Baciarello, Marco Bignami, Elena Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review |
title | Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review |
title_full | Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review |
title_short | Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review |
title_sort | artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35928743 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-7031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellinivalentina artificialintelligenceandanesthesiaanarrativereview AT rafanocarnaemanuele artificialintelligenceandanesthesiaanarrativereview AT russomichele artificialintelligenceandanesthesiaanarrativereview AT divincenzofabiola artificialintelligenceandanesthesiaanarrativereview AT berghentimatteo artificialintelligenceandanesthesiaanarrativereview AT baciarellomarco artificialintelligenceandanesthesiaanarrativereview AT bignamielena artificialintelligenceandanesthesiaanarrativereview |