Cargando…

Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access

BACKGROUND: Many pesticide products are mixtures of multiple chemicals. These include active ingredients intended to kill pests, and so-called inert ingredients intended to improve the physical characteristics of the product. In addition, shortly before applying a pesticide product, applicators ofte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, Caroline, Zeiss, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Environmental Health Perspectives 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35920661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP10634
_version_ 1784761827531423744
author Cox, Caroline
Zeiss, Michael
author_facet Cox, Caroline
Zeiss, Michael
author_sort Cox, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many pesticide products are mixtures of multiple chemicals. These include active ingredients intended to kill pests, and so-called inert ingredients intended to improve the physical characteristics of the product. In addition, shortly before applying a pesticide product, applicators often mix adjuvants into the sprayer tank. Adjuvants are products designed to improve the performance or physical properties of a pesticide spray mixture. Manufacturers may use a particular chemical compound both as an inert ingredient within pesticide products and as a component of adjuvant products. Nonetheless, regulations dictate that data on use are publicly available only for the portion used in adjuvants. Adjuvants are exempt from federal registration, but are defined as pesticides in California. Based on that definition, California has identified [Formula: see text]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) (APNOHO) as the most widely used pesticide in the state, applied to more than [Formula: see text] acres annually. That quantified use includes only agricultural acres treated with adjuvants containing APNOHO. Total APNOHO use is likely higher because manufacturers also use the chemical as an inert ingredient within pesticide products, although data on such use are shielded by regulation. OBJECTIVES: We use APNOHO as a case study to demonstrate that the use of adjuvants and inert ingredients is difficult to track because relevant information is not publicly available. We synthesize information that suggests widespread agricultural use of alkylphenol ethoxylates, such as APNOHO, may pose significant human and environmental health risks. We then make recommendations for future research and policy. METHODS: We used information from California’s pesticide use reporting system and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to estimate use of APNOHO. We used U.S. EPA and European databases, as well as published research, to identify human and environmental health hazards of APNOHO. We focused on research showing that APNOHO is an endocrine-disrupting chemical. DISCUSSION: Within California, APNOHO is applied in more than 150 adjuvant products. Nationwide, it is used as an inert ingredient in at least 650 pesticide products. Exposure to APNOHO is associated with endocrine disruption, birth defects, and aquatic toxicity. We suggest that the case of APNOHO illustrates the larger problem of a lack of publicly available data on use and toxicity of many adjuvants and pesticide inert ingredients. We recommend that researchers and regulators include adjuvants and inert ingredients when evaluating pesticide hazards, including endocrine disruption. We also recommend regulatory requirements to identify all ingredients on product labels. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10634
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9347270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Environmental Health Perspectives
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93472702022-08-05 Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access Cox, Caroline Zeiss, Michael Environ Health Perspect Commentary BACKGROUND: Many pesticide products are mixtures of multiple chemicals. These include active ingredients intended to kill pests, and so-called inert ingredients intended to improve the physical characteristics of the product. In addition, shortly before applying a pesticide product, applicators often mix adjuvants into the sprayer tank. Adjuvants are products designed to improve the performance or physical properties of a pesticide spray mixture. Manufacturers may use a particular chemical compound both as an inert ingredient within pesticide products and as a component of adjuvant products. Nonetheless, regulations dictate that data on use are publicly available only for the portion used in adjuvants. Adjuvants are exempt from federal registration, but are defined as pesticides in California. Based on that definition, California has identified [Formula: see text]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) (APNOHO) as the most widely used pesticide in the state, applied to more than [Formula: see text] acres annually. That quantified use includes only agricultural acres treated with adjuvants containing APNOHO. Total APNOHO use is likely higher because manufacturers also use the chemical as an inert ingredient within pesticide products, although data on such use are shielded by regulation. OBJECTIVES: We use APNOHO as a case study to demonstrate that the use of adjuvants and inert ingredients is difficult to track because relevant information is not publicly available. We synthesize information that suggests widespread agricultural use of alkylphenol ethoxylates, such as APNOHO, may pose significant human and environmental health risks. We then make recommendations for future research and policy. METHODS: We used information from California’s pesticide use reporting system and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to estimate use of APNOHO. We used U.S. EPA and European databases, as well as published research, to identify human and environmental health hazards of APNOHO. We focused on research showing that APNOHO is an endocrine-disrupting chemical. DISCUSSION: Within California, APNOHO is applied in more than 150 adjuvant products. Nationwide, it is used as an inert ingredient in at least 650 pesticide products. Exposure to APNOHO is associated with endocrine disruption, birth defects, and aquatic toxicity. We suggest that the case of APNOHO illustrates the larger problem of a lack of publicly available data on use and toxicity of many adjuvants and pesticide inert ingredients. We recommend that researchers and regulators include adjuvants and inert ingredients when evaluating pesticide hazards, including endocrine disruption. We also recommend regulatory requirements to identify all ingredients on product labels. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10634 Environmental Health Perspectives 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9347270/ /pubmed/35920661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP10634 Text en https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/about-ehp/licenseEHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.
spellingShingle Commentary
Cox, Caroline
Zeiss, Michael
Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access
title Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access
title_full Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access
title_fullStr Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access
title_full_unstemmed Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access
title_short Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access
title_sort health, pesticide adjuvants, and inert ingredients: california case study illustrates need for data access
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35920661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP10634
work_keys_str_mv AT coxcaroline healthpesticideadjuvantsandinertingredientscaliforniacasestudyillustratesneedfordataaccess
AT zeissmichael healthpesticideadjuvantsandinertingredientscaliforniacasestudyillustratesneedfordataaccess