Cargando…

Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE: The Australian COVID‐19 Frontline Healthcare Workers study examined the prevalence and severity of mental health symptoms during the second wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. This substudy examined the differences in psychological well‐being between rural and metropolitan health care workers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tham, Rachel, Pascoe, Amy, Willis, Karen, Kay, Margaret, Smallwood, Natasha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12873
_version_ 1784761857946419200
author Tham, Rachel
Pascoe, Amy
Willis, Karen
Kay, Margaret
Smallwood, Natasha
author_facet Tham, Rachel
Pascoe, Amy
Willis, Karen
Kay, Margaret
Smallwood, Natasha
author_sort Tham, Rachel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Australian COVID‐19 Frontline Healthcare Workers study examined the prevalence and severity of mental health symptoms during the second wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. This substudy examined the differences in psychological well‐being between rural and metropolitan health care workers (HCWs). DESIGN: A nationwide survey conducted between August and October 2020. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Australian HCWs were recruited through multiple strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, post‐traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] and burnout). RESULTS: Complete responses were included from 7846 participants, with 1473 (18.8%) in regional or remote (‘rural’) areas and 81.2% in metropolitan areas. Rural participants were older, more likely to work in allied health, nursing or in health administration, and had worked longer in their profession than metropolitan participants. Levels of resilience were similar (p = 0.132), but there was significantly higher prevalence of pre‐COVID‐19 pandemic mental illness in the rural workforce (p < 0.001). There were high levels of current mental health issues: moderate–severe PTSD (rural 38.0%; metropolitan 41.0% p = 0.031); high depersonalisation (rural 18.1%; metropolitan 20.7% p = 0.047); and high emotional exhaustion (rural 46.5%; metropolitan 43.3% p = 0.002). Among rural participants, mental health symptoms were associated with younger age, worry about being blamed if they contracted COVID‐19, fear of transmitting COVID‐19 to their family, experiencing worsening relationships and working in primary care or allied health. CONCLUSION: Despite having low COVID‐19 case numbers in rural Australian health services compared with metropolitan counterparts over the course of 2020, there were widespread mental health impacts on the workforce. Rural health services need specific and flexible training, education, work policies and practices that support psychological well‐being now in preparedness for ongoing or future crises.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9347496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93474962022-08-03 Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic Tham, Rachel Pascoe, Amy Willis, Karen Kay, Margaret Smallwood, Natasha Aust J Rural Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: The Australian COVID‐19 Frontline Healthcare Workers study examined the prevalence and severity of mental health symptoms during the second wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. This substudy examined the differences in psychological well‐being between rural and metropolitan health care workers (HCWs). DESIGN: A nationwide survey conducted between August and October 2020. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Australian HCWs were recruited through multiple strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, post‐traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] and burnout). RESULTS: Complete responses were included from 7846 participants, with 1473 (18.8%) in regional or remote (‘rural’) areas and 81.2% in metropolitan areas. Rural participants were older, more likely to work in allied health, nursing or in health administration, and had worked longer in their profession than metropolitan participants. Levels of resilience were similar (p = 0.132), but there was significantly higher prevalence of pre‐COVID‐19 pandemic mental illness in the rural workforce (p < 0.001). There were high levels of current mental health issues: moderate–severe PTSD (rural 38.0%; metropolitan 41.0% p = 0.031); high depersonalisation (rural 18.1%; metropolitan 20.7% p = 0.047); and high emotional exhaustion (rural 46.5%; metropolitan 43.3% p = 0.002). Among rural participants, mental health symptoms were associated with younger age, worry about being blamed if they contracted COVID‐19, fear of transmitting COVID‐19 to their family, experiencing worsening relationships and working in primary care or allied health. CONCLUSION: Despite having low COVID‐19 case numbers in rural Australian health services compared with metropolitan counterparts over the course of 2020, there were widespread mental health impacts on the workforce. Rural health services need specific and flexible training, education, work policies and practices that support psychological well‐being now in preparedness for ongoing or future crises. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-05 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9347496/ /pubmed/35511109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12873 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian Journal of Rural Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of National Rural Health Alliance Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tham, Rachel
Pascoe, Amy
Willis, Karen
Kay, Margaret
Smallwood, Natasha
Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_fullStr Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_short Differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_sort differences in psychosocial distress among rural and metropolitan health care workers during the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12873
work_keys_str_mv AT thamrachel differencesinpsychosocialdistressamongruralandmetropolitanhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT pascoeamy differencesinpsychosocialdistressamongruralandmetropolitanhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT williskaren differencesinpsychosocialdistressamongruralandmetropolitanhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT kaymargaret differencesinpsychosocialdistressamongruralandmetropolitanhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic
AT smallwoodnatasha differencesinpsychosocialdistressamongruralandmetropolitanhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic