Cargando…

Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns

The dual mandate for many protected areas (PAs) to simultaneously promote recreation and conserve biodiversity may be hampered by negative effects of recreation on wildlife. However, reports of these effects are not consistent, presenting a knowledge gap that hinders evidence‐based decision‐making....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Procko, Michael, Naidoo, Robin, LeMay, Valerie, Burton, A. Cole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12743
_version_ 1784761864738045952
author Procko, Michael
Naidoo, Robin
LeMay, Valerie
Burton, A. Cole
author_facet Procko, Michael
Naidoo, Robin
LeMay, Valerie
Burton, A. Cole
author_sort Procko, Michael
collection PubMed
description The dual mandate for many protected areas (PAs) to simultaneously promote recreation and conserve biodiversity may be hampered by negative effects of recreation on wildlife. However, reports of these effects are not consistent, presenting a knowledge gap that hinders evidence‐based decision‐making. We used camera traps to monitor human activity and terrestrial mammals in Golden Ears Provincial Park and the adjacent University of British Columbia Malcolm Knapp Research Forest near Vancouver, Canada, with the objective of discerning relative effects of various forms of recreation on cougars (Puma concolor), black bears (Ursus americanus), black‐tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and bobcats (Lynx rufus). Additionally, public closures of the study area associated with the COVD‐19 pandemic offered an unprecedented period of human‐exclusion through which to explore these effects. Using Bayesian generalized mixed‐effects models, we detected negative effects of hikers (mean posterior estimate = −0.58, 95% credible interval [CI] −1.09 to −0.12) on weekly bobcat habitat use and negative effects of motorized vehicles (estimate = −0.28, 95% CI −0.61 to −0.05) on weekly black bear habitat use. We also found increased cougar detection rates in the PA during the COVID‐19 closure (estimate = 0.007, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.009), but decreased cougar detection rates (estimate = −0.006, 95% CI −0.009 to −0.003) and increased black‐tailed deer detection rates (estimate = 0.014, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.026) upon reopening of the PA. Our results emphasize that effects of human activity on wildlife habitat use and movement may be species‐ and/or activity‐dependent, and that camera traps can be an invaluable tool for monitoring both wildlife and human activity, collecting data even when public access is barred. Further, we encourage PA managers seeking to promote both biodiversity conservation and recreation to explicitly assess trade‐offs between these two goals in their PAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9347595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93475952022-08-03 Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns Procko, Michael Naidoo, Robin LeMay, Valerie Burton, A. Cole Conserv Sci Pract Contributed Papers The dual mandate for many protected areas (PAs) to simultaneously promote recreation and conserve biodiversity may be hampered by negative effects of recreation on wildlife. However, reports of these effects are not consistent, presenting a knowledge gap that hinders evidence‐based decision‐making. We used camera traps to monitor human activity and terrestrial mammals in Golden Ears Provincial Park and the adjacent University of British Columbia Malcolm Knapp Research Forest near Vancouver, Canada, with the objective of discerning relative effects of various forms of recreation on cougars (Puma concolor), black bears (Ursus americanus), black‐tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus), snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and bobcats (Lynx rufus). Additionally, public closures of the study area associated with the COVD‐19 pandemic offered an unprecedented period of human‐exclusion through which to explore these effects. Using Bayesian generalized mixed‐effects models, we detected negative effects of hikers (mean posterior estimate = −0.58, 95% credible interval [CI] −1.09 to −0.12) on weekly bobcat habitat use and negative effects of motorized vehicles (estimate = −0.28, 95% CI −0.61 to −0.05) on weekly black bear habitat use. We also found increased cougar detection rates in the PA during the COVID‐19 closure (estimate = 0.007, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.009), but decreased cougar detection rates (estimate = −0.006, 95% CI −0.009 to −0.003) and increased black‐tailed deer detection rates (estimate = 0.014, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.026) upon reopening of the PA. Our results emphasize that effects of human activity on wildlife habitat use and movement may be species‐ and/or activity‐dependent, and that camera traps can be an invaluable tool for monitoring both wildlife and human activity, collecting data even when public access is barred. Further, we encourage PA managers seeking to promote both biodiversity conservation and recreation to explicitly assess trade‐offs between these two goals in their PAs. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2022-06-07 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9347595/ /pubmed/35935172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12743 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
Procko, Michael
Naidoo, Robin
LeMay, Valerie
Burton, A. Cole
Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns
title Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns
title_full Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns
title_fullStr Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns
title_full_unstemmed Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns
title_short Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns
title_sort human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after covid‐19 lockdowns
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12743
work_keys_str_mv AT prockomichael humanimpactsonmammalsinandaroundaprotectedareabeforeduringandaftercovid19lockdowns
AT naidoorobin humanimpactsonmammalsinandaroundaprotectedareabeforeduringandaftercovid19lockdowns
AT lemayvalerie humanimpactsonmammalsinandaroundaprotectedareabeforeduringandaftercovid19lockdowns
AT burtonacole humanimpactsonmammalsinandaroundaprotectedareabeforeduringandaftercovid19lockdowns