Cargando…

Vaccines and the social amplification of risk

In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) named “Vaccine Hesitancy” one of the top 10 threats to global health. Shortly afterward, the COVID‐19 pandemic emerged as the world's predominant health concern. COVID‐19 vaccines of several types have been developed, tested, and partially deployed w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larson, Heidi J., Lin, Leesa, Goble, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13942
_version_ 1784761877337735168
author Larson, Heidi J.
Lin, Leesa
Goble, Rob
author_facet Larson, Heidi J.
Lin, Leesa
Goble, Rob
author_sort Larson, Heidi J.
collection PubMed
description In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) named “Vaccine Hesitancy” one of the top 10 threats to global health. Shortly afterward, the COVID‐19 pandemic emerged as the world's predominant health concern. COVID‐19 vaccines of several types have been developed, tested, and partially deployed with remarkable speed; vaccines are now the primary control measure and hope for a return to normalcy. However, hesitancy concerning these vaccines, along with resistance to masking and other control measures, remains a substantial obstacle. The previous waves of vaccine hesitancy that led to the WHO threat designation, together with recent COVID‐19 experience, provide a window for viewing new forms of social amplification of risk (SAR). Not surprisingly, vaccines provide fertile ground for questions, anxieties, concerns, and rumors. These appear in new globalized hyperconnected communications landscapes and in the context of complex human (social, economic, and political) systems that exhibit evolving concerns about vaccines and authorities. We look at drivers, impacts, and implications for vaccine initiatives in several recent historical examples and in the current efforts with COVID‐19 vaccination. Findings and insights were drawn from the Vaccine Confidence Project's decade long monitoring of media and social media and its related research efforts. The trends in vaccine confidence and resistance have implications for updating the social amplification of risk framework (SARF); in turn, SARF has practical implications for guiding efforts to alleviate vaccine hesitancy and to mitigate harms from intentional and unintentional vaccine scares.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9347756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93477562022-08-03 Vaccines and the social amplification of risk Larson, Heidi J. Lin, Leesa Goble, Rob Risk Anal Perspective In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) named “Vaccine Hesitancy” one of the top 10 threats to global health. Shortly afterward, the COVID‐19 pandemic emerged as the world's predominant health concern. COVID‐19 vaccines of several types have been developed, tested, and partially deployed with remarkable speed; vaccines are now the primary control measure and hope for a return to normalcy. However, hesitancy concerning these vaccines, along with resistance to masking and other control measures, remains a substantial obstacle. The previous waves of vaccine hesitancy that led to the WHO threat designation, together with recent COVID‐19 experience, provide a window for viewing new forms of social amplification of risk (SAR). Not surprisingly, vaccines provide fertile ground for questions, anxieties, concerns, and rumors. These appear in new globalized hyperconnected communications landscapes and in the context of complex human (social, economic, and political) systems that exhibit evolving concerns about vaccines and authorities. We look at drivers, impacts, and implications for vaccine initiatives in several recent historical examples and in the current efforts with COVID‐19 vaccination. Findings and insights were drawn from the Vaccine Confidence Project's decade long monitoring of media and social media and its related research efforts. The trends in vaccine confidence and resistance have implications for updating the social amplification of risk framework (SARF); in turn, SARF has practical implications for guiding efforts to alleviate vaccine hesitancy and to mitigate harms from intentional and unintentional vaccine scares. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-14 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9347756/ /pubmed/35568963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13942 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Perspective
Larson, Heidi J.
Lin, Leesa
Goble, Rob
Vaccines and the social amplification of risk
title Vaccines and the social amplification of risk
title_full Vaccines and the social amplification of risk
title_fullStr Vaccines and the social amplification of risk
title_full_unstemmed Vaccines and the social amplification of risk
title_short Vaccines and the social amplification of risk
title_sort vaccines and the social amplification of risk
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35568963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13942
work_keys_str_mv AT larsonheidij vaccinesandthesocialamplificationofrisk
AT linleesa vaccinesandthesocialamplificationofrisk
AT goblerob vaccinesandthesocialamplificationofrisk