Cargando…
Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), given as a two‐dose series, 3 weeks apart, elicits a serological response in 84–98% of patients with cancer, even if administered while undergoing anticancer treatments. Herein, we report the impact of a third (booster) dose of BNT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1645 |
_version_ | 1784761891853172736 |
---|---|
author | Shmueli, Einat Shacham Lawrence, Yaacov R. Rahav, Galia Itay, Amit Lustig, Yaniv Halpern, Naama Boursi, Ben Margalit, Ofer |
author_facet | Shmueli, Einat Shacham Lawrence, Yaacov R. Rahav, Galia Itay, Amit Lustig, Yaniv Halpern, Naama Boursi, Ben Margalit, Ofer |
author_sort | Shmueli, Einat Shacham |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), given as a two‐dose series, 3 weeks apart, elicits a serological response in 84–98% of patients with cancer, even if administered while undergoing anticancer treatments. Herein, we report the impact of a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2, delivered 6 months following the second vaccine dose. METHODS: This pilot study included four patients with cancer who were seronegative after two vaccine doses, and received a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2 at 6 months following the second vaccine dose. The four patients received the three vaccine doses between December 2020 and July 2021. Samples were evaluated with an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies against the RBD (receptor‐binding domain) of SARS‐CoV‐2. RESULTS: At a mean time of 19 days (ranges 7–28) after the second vaccination, all four patients were seronegative for RBD‐IgG. However, at a mean time of 21 days (ranges 20–22) after the third dose, three out of the four patients (75%) were now seropositive. Mean RBD‐IgG titers were increased after the third vaccine dose from 0.37 to 2.81 (Student's t‐test, p = 0.05, two‐sided). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small sample size, our findings suggest that a third (booster) dose administered to patients with cancer, who remain seronegative despite two doses of BNT162b2, may be efficacious in eliciting an antibody response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9347981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93479812022-08-04 Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients Shmueli, Einat Shacham Lawrence, Yaacov R. Rahav, Galia Itay, Amit Lustig, Yaniv Halpern, Naama Boursi, Ben Margalit, Ofer Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Brief Report BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), given as a two‐dose series, 3 weeks apart, elicits a serological response in 84–98% of patients with cancer, even if administered while undergoing anticancer treatments. Herein, we report the impact of a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2, delivered 6 months following the second vaccine dose. METHODS: This pilot study included four patients with cancer who were seronegative after two vaccine doses, and received a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2 at 6 months following the second vaccine dose. The four patients received the three vaccine doses between December 2020 and July 2021. Samples were evaluated with an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies against the RBD (receptor‐binding domain) of SARS‐CoV‐2. RESULTS: At a mean time of 19 days (ranges 7–28) after the second vaccination, all four patients were seronegative for RBD‐IgG. However, at a mean time of 21 days (ranges 20–22) after the third dose, three out of the four patients (75%) were now seropositive. Mean RBD‐IgG titers were increased after the third vaccine dose from 0.37 to 2.81 (Student's t‐test, p = 0.05, two‐sided). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small sample size, our findings suggest that a third (booster) dose administered to patients with cancer, who remain seronegative despite two doses of BNT162b2, may be efficacious in eliciting an antibody response. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9347981/ /pubmed/35652556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1645 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Shmueli, Einat Shacham Lawrence, Yaacov R. Rahav, Galia Itay, Amit Lustig, Yaniv Halpern, Naama Boursi, Ben Margalit, Ofer Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients |
title | Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients |
title_full | Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients |
title_short | Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients |
title_sort | serological response to a third booster dose of bnt162b2 covid‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shmuelieinatshacham serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients AT lawrenceyaacovr serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients AT rahavgalia serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients AT itayamit serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients AT lustigyaniv serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients AT halpernnaama serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients AT boursiben serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients AT margalitofer serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients |