Cargando…

Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), given as a two‐dose series, 3 weeks apart, elicits a serological response in 84–98% of patients with cancer, even if administered while undergoing anticancer treatments. Herein, we report the impact of a third (booster) dose of BNT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shmueli, Einat Shacham, Lawrence, Yaacov R., Rahav, Galia, Itay, Amit, Lustig, Yaniv, Halpern, Naama, Boursi, Ben, Margalit, Ofer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1645
_version_ 1784761891853172736
author Shmueli, Einat Shacham
Lawrence, Yaacov R.
Rahav, Galia
Itay, Amit
Lustig, Yaniv
Halpern, Naama
Boursi, Ben
Margalit, Ofer
author_facet Shmueli, Einat Shacham
Lawrence, Yaacov R.
Rahav, Galia
Itay, Amit
Lustig, Yaniv
Halpern, Naama
Boursi, Ben
Margalit, Ofer
author_sort Shmueli, Einat Shacham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), given as a two‐dose series, 3 weeks apart, elicits a serological response in 84–98% of patients with cancer, even if administered while undergoing anticancer treatments. Herein, we report the impact of a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2, delivered 6 months following the second vaccine dose. METHODS: This pilot study included four patients with cancer who were seronegative after two vaccine doses, and received a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2 at 6 months following the second vaccine dose. The four patients received the three vaccine doses between December 2020 and July 2021. Samples were evaluated with an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies against the RBD (receptor‐binding domain) of SARS‐CoV‐2. RESULTS: At a mean time of 19 days (ranges 7–28) after the second vaccination, all four patients were seronegative for RBD‐IgG. However, at a mean time of 21 days (ranges 20–22) after the third dose, three out of the four patients (75%) were now seropositive. Mean RBD‐IgG titers were increased after the third vaccine dose from 0.37 to 2.81 (Student's t‐test, p = 0.05, two‐sided). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small sample size, our findings suggest that a third (booster) dose administered to patients with cancer, who remain seronegative despite two doses of BNT162b2, may be efficacious in eliciting an antibody response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9347981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93479812022-08-04 Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients Shmueli, Einat Shacham Lawrence, Yaacov R. Rahav, Galia Itay, Amit Lustig, Yaniv Halpern, Naama Boursi, Ben Margalit, Ofer Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Brief Report BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), given as a two‐dose series, 3 weeks apart, elicits a serological response in 84–98% of patients with cancer, even if administered while undergoing anticancer treatments. Herein, we report the impact of a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2, delivered 6 months following the second vaccine dose. METHODS: This pilot study included four patients with cancer who were seronegative after two vaccine doses, and received a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2 at 6 months following the second vaccine dose. The four patients received the three vaccine doses between December 2020 and July 2021. Samples were evaluated with an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies against the RBD (receptor‐binding domain) of SARS‐CoV‐2. RESULTS: At a mean time of 19 days (ranges 7–28) after the second vaccination, all four patients were seronegative for RBD‐IgG. However, at a mean time of 21 days (ranges 20–22) after the third dose, three out of the four patients (75%) were now seropositive. Mean RBD‐IgG titers were increased after the third vaccine dose from 0.37 to 2.81 (Student's t‐test, p = 0.05, two‐sided). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small sample size, our findings suggest that a third (booster) dose administered to patients with cancer, who remain seronegative despite two doses of BNT162b2, may be efficacious in eliciting an antibody response. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9347981/ /pubmed/35652556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1645 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Shmueli, Einat Shacham
Lawrence, Yaacov R.
Rahav, Galia
Itay, Amit
Lustig, Yaniv
Halpern, Naama
Boursi, Ben
Margalit, Ofer
Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
title Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
title_full Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
title_fullStr Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
title_short Serological response to a third booster dose of BNT162b2 COVID‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
title_sort serological response to a third booster dose of bnt162b2 covid‐19 vaccine among seronegative cancer patients
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9347981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1645
work_keys_str_mv AT shmuelieinatshacham serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients
AT lawrenceyaacovr serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients
AT rahavgalia serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients
AT itayamit serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients
AT lustigyaniv serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients
AT halpernnaama serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients
AT boursiben serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients
AT margalitofer serologicalresponsetoathirdboosterdoseofbnt162b2covid19vaccineamongseronegativecancerpatients