Cargando…

The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound

BACKGROUND: The association between COVID‐19 infection and the cardiovascular system necessitates the use of an echocardiogram in this setting. Information on the utilization, safety, and quality of point‐of‐care cardiac and lung ultrasound using a hand‐held device in these patients is scarce. AIMS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dadon, Ziv, Levi, Nir, Alpert, Evan Avraham, Orlev, Amir, Belman, Daniel, Glikson, Michael, Butnaru, Adi, Gottlieb, Shmuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9348495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.15372
_version_ 1784761931385536512
author Dadon, Ziv
Levi, Nir
Alpert, Evan Avraham
Orlev, Amir
Belman, Daniel
Glikson, Michael
Butnaru, Adi
Gottlieb, Shmuel
author_facet Dadon, Ziv
Levi, Nir
Alpert, Evan Avraham
Orlev, Amir
Belman, Daniel
Glikson, Michael
Butnaru, Adi
Gottlieb, Shmuel
author_sort Dadon, Ziv
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The association between COVID‐19 infection and the cardiovascular system necessitates the use of an echocardiogram in this setting. Information on the utilization, safety, and quality of point‐of‐care cardiac and lung ultrasound using a hand‐held device in these patients is scarce. AIMS: To investigate the safety, technical aspects, quality indices, and interpretive accuracy of a hand‐held echocardiogram in patients with COVID‐19. METHODS: From April‐28 through July‐27, 2020, consecutive patients with COVID‐19 underwent hand‐held echocardiogram and lung ultrasound evaluation (Vscan Extend™; GE Healthcare) within 48‐h of admission. The operators recorded a series of technical parameters and graded individual experiences. The examinations were further analyzed by a blinded fellowship‐trained echocardiographer for general quality, proper acquisition, and right ventricular (RV) demonstration. RESULTS: Among 103 patients, 66 (64.1%) were male. Twenty‐nine (28.2%) patients could not turn on their left side and 23 (22.3%) could not maintain effective communication. The mean length of each echocardiogram study was 8.5 ± 2.9 min, battery usage was 14 ± 5%, and mean operator‐to‐patient proximity was 59 ± 11 cm. Ninety‐five (92.2%) examinations were graded as fair/good quality. A fair agreement was demonstrated between the operator and the echocardiographer for general ultrasound quality (Kappa = 0.329, p < 0.001). A fair‐good correlation (r = 0.679, p < 0.001) and substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.612, p < 0.001) were demonstrated between the operator and echocardiographer for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), whereas a fair agreement was demonstrated for RV systolic function (Kappa = 0.308, p = 0.002). LVEF agreement was also assessed using the Bland‐Altman analysis revealing a mean bias of −0.96 (95% limits of agreement 9.43 to −11.35; p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with COVID‐19, echocardiography with a hand‐held ultrasound is a safe and reasonable alternative for a complete formal study (<10% poor‐quality indices). Echocardiogram assessment by the operators during the exam acquisition is reliable for LVEF, while RV systolic function should be subsequently offline reassessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9348495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93484952022-08-04 The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound Dadon, Ziv Levi, Nir Alpert, Evan Avraham Orlev, Amir Belman, Daniel Glikson, Michael Butnaru, Adi Gottlieb, Shmuel Echocardiography Original Articles BACKGROUND: The association between COVID‐19 infection and the cardiovascular system necessitates the use of an echocardiogram in this setting. Information on the utilization, safety, and quality of point‐of‐care cardiac and lung ultrasound using a hand‐held device in these patients is scarce. AIMS: To investigate the safety, technical aspects, quality indices, and interpretive accuracy of a hand‐held echocardiogram in patients with COVID‐19. METHODS: From April‐28 through July‐27, 2020, consecutive patients with COVID‐19 underwent hand‐held echocardiogram and lung ultrasound evaluation (Vscan Extend™; GE Healthcare) within 48‐h of admission. The operators recorded a series of technical parameters and graded individual experiences. The examinations were further analyzed by a blinded fellowship‐trained echocardiographer for general quality, proper acquisition, and right ventricular (RV) demonstration. RESULTS: Among 103 patients, 66 (64.1%) were male. Twenty‐nine (28.2%) patients could not turn on their left side and 23 (22.3%) could not maintain effective communication. The mean length of each echocardiogram study was 8.5 ± 2.9 min, battery usage was 14 ± 5%, and mean operator‐to‐patient proximity was 59 ± 11 cm. Ninety‐five (92.2%) examinations were graded as fair/good quality. A fair agreement was demonstrated between the operator and the echocardiographer for general ultrasound quality (Kappa = 0.329, p < 0.001). A fair‐good correlation (r = 0.679, p < 0.001) and substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.612, p < 0.001) were demonstrated between the operator and echocardiographer for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), whereas a fair agreement was demonstrated for RV systolic function (Kappa = 0.308, p = 0.002). LVEF agreement was also assessed using the Bland‐Altman analysis revealing a mean bias of −0.96 (95% limits of agreement 9.43 to −11.35; p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with COVID‐19, echocardiography with a hand‐held ultrasound is a safe and reasonable alternative for a complete formal study (<10% poor‐quality indices). Echocardiogram assessment by the operators during the exam acquisition is reliable for LVEF, while RV systolic function should be subsequently offline reassessed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-06 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9348495/ /pubmed/35668047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.15372 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Echocardiography published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dadon, Ziv
Levi, Nir
Alpert, Evan Avraham
Orlev, Amir
Belman, Daniel
Glikson, Michael
Butnaru, Adi
Gottlieb, Shmuel
The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound
title The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound
title_full The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound
title_fullStr The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound
title_short The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound
title_sort quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of covid‐19 patients using a hand‐held ultrasound
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9348495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.15372
work_keys_str_mv AT dadonziv thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT levinir thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT alpertevanavraham thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT orlevamir thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT belmandaniel thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT gliksonmichael thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT butnaruadi thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT gottliebshmuel thequalitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT dadonziv qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT levinir qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT alpertevanavraham qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT orlevamir qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT belmandaniel qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT gliksonmichael qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT butnaruadi qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound
AT gottliebshmuel qualitysafetyfeasibilityandinterpretiveaccuracyofechocardiographicandlungultrasoundassessmentofcovid19patientsusingahandheldultrasound