Cargando…

Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI). METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaubitzer, Lena, Schaefer, Elena, Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth, Burkart, Johannes, Herrmann, Katrin, Walter, Beatrice, Schell, Angela, Scherl, Claudia, Servais, Jérôme, Haeussler, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese PLA General Hospital 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001
_version_ 1784762037843263488
author Zaubitzer, Lena
Schaefer, Elena
Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth
Burkart, Johannes
Herrmann, Katrin
Walter, Beatrice
Schell, Angela
Scherl, Claudia
Servais, Jérôme
Haeussler, Daniel
author_facet Zaubitzer, Lena
Schaefer, Elena
Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth
Burkart, Johannes
Herrmann, Katrin
Walter, Beatrice
Schell, Angela
Scherl, Claudia
Servais, Jérôme
Haeussler, Daniel
author_sort Zaubitzer, Lena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI). METHODS: The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories. RESULTS: Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method. CONCLUSION: All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9349019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Chinese PLA General Hospital
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93490192022-08-09 Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants Zaubitzer, Lena Schaefer, Elena Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth Burkart, Johannes Herrmann, Katrin Walter, Beatrice Schell, Angela Scherl, Claudia Servais, Jérôme Haeussler, Daniel J Otol Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI). METHODS: The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories. RESULTS: Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method. CONCLUSION: All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on. Chinese PLA General Hospital 2022-04 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9349019/ /pubmed/35949548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001 Text en © 2021 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Zaubitzer, Lena
Schaefer, Elena
Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth
Burkart, Johannes
Herrmann, Katrin
Walter, Beatrice
Schell, Angela
Scherl, Claudia
Servais, Jérôme
Haeussler, Daniel
Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
title Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
title_full Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
title_fullStr Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
title_full_unstemmed Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
title_short Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
title_sort methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001
work_keys_str_mv AT zaubitzerlena methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT schaeferelena methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT wallhaeuserfrankeelisabeth methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT burkartjohannes methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT herrmannkatrin methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT walterbeatrice methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT schellangela methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT scherlclaudia methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT servaisjerome methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants
AT haeusslerdaniel methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants