Cargando…
Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI). METHODS: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chinese PLA General Hospital
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001 |
_version_ | 1784762037843263488 |
---|---|
author | Zaubitzer, Lena Schaefer, Elena Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth Burkart, Johannes Herrmann, Katrin Walter, Beatrice Schell, Angela Scherl, Claudia Servais, Jérôme Haeussler, Daniel |
author_facet | Zaubitzer, Lena Schaefer, Elena Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth Burkart, Johannes Herrmann, Katrin Walter, Beatrice Schell, Angela Scherl, Claudia Servais, Jérôme Haeussler, Daniel |
author_sort | Zaubitzer, Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI). METHODS: The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories. RESULTS: Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method. CONCLUSION: All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9349019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Chinese PLA General Hospital |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93490192022-08-09 Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants Zaubitzer, Lena Schaefer, Elena Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth Burkart, Johannes Herrmann, Katrin Walter, Beatrice Schell, Angela Scherl, Claudia Servais, Jérôme Haeussler, Daniel J Otol Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI). METHODS: The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories. RESULTS: Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method. CONCLUSION: All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on. Chinese PLA General Hospital 2022-04 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9349019/ /pubmed/35949548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001 Text en © 2021 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zaubitzer, Lena Schaefer, Elena Wallhaeuser-Franke, Elisabeth Burkart, Johannes Herrmann, Katrin Walter, Beatrice Schell, Angela Scherl, Claudia Servais, Jérôme Haeussler, Daniel Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants |
title | Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants |
title_full | Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants |
title_fullStr | Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants |
title_short | Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants |
title_sort | methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaubitzerlena methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT schaeferelena methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT wallhaeuserfrankeelisabeth methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT burkartjohannes methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT herrmannkatrin methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT walterbeatrice methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT schellangela methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT scherlclaudia methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT servaisjerome methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants AT haeusslerdaniel methodsformeasuringpreintraandpostoperativeskinthicknessforcochlearimplants |