Cargando…

The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Cervical dystonia (CD) is an isolated, focal, idiopathic dystonia affecting the neck and upper back. CD is usually treated by botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections into the dystonic muscles; however, about 20% of people will discontinue BoNT therapy. This systematic review aimed to dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyce, Melani J., McCambridge, Alana B., Bradnam, Lynley V., Canning, Colleen G., Verhagen, Arianne P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06114-8
_version_ 1784762061393231872
author Boyce, Melani J.
McCambridge, Alana B.
Bradnam, Lynley V.
Canning, Colleen G.
Verhagen, Arianne P.
author_facet Boyce, Melani J.
McCambridge, Alana B.
Bradnam, Lynley V.
Canning, Colleen G.
Verhagen, Arianne P.
author_sort Boyce, Melani J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical dystonia (CD) is an isolated, focal, idiopathic dystonia affecting the neck and upper back. CD is usually treated by botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections into the dystonic muscles; however, about 20% of people will discontinue BoNT therapy. This systematic review aimed to determine the barriers to satisfaction and facilitators that could improve satisfaction with BoNT therapy for people with CD. METHODS: A database search for journal articles investigating satisfaction with BoNT treatment in CD identified seven qualitative studies and one randomised controlled trial. Results were grouped into “direct” and “indirect” barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The most reported direct barrier to satisfaction with BoNT was treatment non-response, reported by up to 66% of participants. Other direct barriers included negative side effects, early wearing-off of treatment effect and inexperience of the treating physician. Indirect barriers included limited accessibility to treatment (including cost) and personal choice. Direct facilitators of satisfaction with BoNT included relief of symptoms and flexible re-treatment intervals. Indirect facilitators included easy accessibility to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite BoNT having a discontinuation rate of only 20%, it appears a much greater proportion of people with CD are dissatisfied with this treatment. As BoNT is currently the main treatment offered to people with CD, efforts to improve treatment response rates, reduce side effects and make treatment more flexible and readily available should be adopted to improve the quality of life for people with CD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-06114-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9349125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93491252022-08-05 The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review Boyce, Melani J. McCambridge, Alana B. Bradnam, Lynley V. Canning, Colleen G. Verhagen, Arianne P. Neurol Sci Review Article BACKGROUND: Cervical dystonia (CD) is an isolated, focal, idiopathic dystonia affecting the neck and upper back. CD is usually treated by botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections into the dystonic muscles; however, about 20% of people will discontinue BoNT therapy. This systematic review aimed to determine the barriers to satisfaction and facilitators that could improve satisfaction with BoNT therapy for people with CD. METHODS: A database search for journal articles investigating satisfaction with BoNT treatment in CD identified seven qualitative studies and one randomised controlled trial. Results were grouped into “direct” and “indirect” barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The most reported direct barrier to satisfaction with BoNT was treatment non-response, reported by up to 66% of participants. Other direct barriers included negative side effects, early wearing-off of treatment effect and inexperience of the treating physician. Indirect barriers included limited accessibility to treatment (including cost) and personal choice. Direct facilitators of satisfaction with BoNT included relief of symptoms and flexible re-treatment intervals. Indirect facilitators included easy accessibility to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite BoNT having a discontinuation rate of only 20%, it appears a much greater proportion of people with CD are dissatisfied with this treatment. As BoNT is currently the main treatment offered to people with CD, efforts to improve treatment response rates, reduce side effects and make treatment more flexible and readily available should be adopted to improve the quality of life for people with CD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-06114-8. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9349125/ /pubmed/35593979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06114-8 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Boyce, Melani J.
McCambridge, Alana B.
Bradnam, Lynley V.
Canning, Colleen G.
Verhagen, Arianne P.
The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review
title The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review
title_full The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review
title_fullStr The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review
title_short The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review
title_sort barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06114-8
work_keys_str_mv AT boycemelanij thebarriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT mccambridgealanab thebarriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT bradnamlynleyv thebarriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT canningcolleeng thebarriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT verhagenariannep thebarriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT boycemelanij barriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT mccambridgealanab barriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT bradnamlynleyv barriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT canningcolleeng barriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview
AT verhagenariannep barriersandfacilitatorstosatisfactionwithbotulinumneurotoxintreatmentinpeoplewithcervicaldystoniaasystematicreview