Cargando…

Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality

PURPOSE: To compare examination quality and acceptability of three different low-volume bowel preparation regimens differing in scheduling of the oral administration of a Macrogol-based solution, in patients undergoing computed tomographic colonography (CTC). The secondary aim was to compare CTC qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mistretta, Francesco, Damiani, Nicolò, Campanella, Delia, Mazzetti, Simone, Gulino, Alessia, Cappello, Giovanni, Regge, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01514-4
_version_ 1784762064591388672
author Mistretta, Francesco
Damiani, Nicolò
Campanella, Delia
Mazzetti, Simone
Gulino, Alessia
Cappello, Giovanni
Regge, Daniele
author_facet Mistretta, Francesco
Damiani, Nicolò
Campanella, Delia
Mazzetti, Simone
Gulino, Alessia
Cappello, Giovanni
Regge, Daniele
author_sort Mistretta, Francesco
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare examination quality and acceptability of three different low-volume bowel preparation regimens differing in scheduling of the oral administration of a Macrogol-based solution, in patients undergoing computed tomographic colonography (CTC). The secondary aim was to compare CTC quality according to anatomical and patient variables (dolichocolon, colonic diverticulosis, functional and secondary constipation). METHODS: One-hundred-eighty patients were randomized into one of three regimens where PEG was administered, respectively: in a single dose the day prior to (A), or in a fractionated dose 2 (B) and 3 days (C) before the examination. Two experienced radiologists evaluated fecal tagging (FT) density and homogeneity both qualitatively and quantitatively by assessing mean segment density (MSD) and relative standard deviation (RSD). Tolerance to the regimens and patient variables were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared to B and C, regimen A showed a lower percentage of segments with inadequate FT and a significantly higher median FT density and/or homogeneity scores as well as significantly higher MSD values in some colonic segments. No statistically significant differences were found in tolerance of the preparations. A higher number of inadequate segments were observed in patients with dolichocolon (p < 0.01) and secondary constipation (p < 0.01). Interobserver agreement was high for the assessment of both FT density (k = 0.887) and homogeneity (k = 0.852). CONCLUSION: The best examination quality was obtained when PEG was administered the day before CTC in a single session. The presence of dolichocolon and secondary constipation represent a risk factor for the presence of inadequately tagged colonic segments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9349139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93491392022-08-05 Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality Mistretta, Francesco Damiani, Nicolò Campanella, Delia Mazzetti, Simone Gulino, Alessia Cappello, Giovanni Regge, Daniele Radiol Med Abdominal Radiology PURPOSE: To compare examination quality and acceptability of three different low-volume bowel preparation regimens differing in scheduling of the oral administration of a Macrogol-based solution, in patients undergoing computed tomographic colonography (CTC). The secondary aim was to compare CTC quality according to anatomical and patient variables (dolichocolon, colonic diverticulosis, functional and secondary constipation). METHODS: One-hundred-eighty patients were randomized into one of three regimens where PEG was administered, respectively: in a single dose the day prior to (A), or in a fractionated dose 2 (B) and 3 days (C) before the examination. Two experienced radiologists evaluated fecal tagging (FT) density and homogeneity both qualitatively and quantitatively by assessing mean segment density (MSD) and relative standard deviation (RSD). Tolerance to the regimens and patient variables were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared to B and C, regimen A showed a lower percentage of segments with inadequate FT and a significantly higher median FT density and/or homogeneity scores as well as significantly higher MSD values in some colonic segments. No statistically significant differences were found in tolerance of the preparations. A higher number of inadequate segments were observed in patients with dolichocolon (p < 0.01) and secondary constipation (p < 0.01). Interobserver agreement was high for the assessment of both FT density (k = 0.887) and homogeneity (k = 0.852). CONCLUSION: The best examination quality was obtained when PEG was administered the day before CTC in a single session. The presence of dolichocolon and secondary constipation represent a risk factor for the presence of inadequately tagged colonic segments. Springer Milan 2022-06-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9349139/ /pubmed/35715681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01514-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Abdominal Radiology
Mistretta, Francesco
Damiani, Nicolò
Campanella, Delia
Mazzetti, Simone
Gulino, Alessia
Cappello, Giovanni
Regge, Daniele
Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality
title Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality
title_full Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality
title_fullStr Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality
title_full_unstemmed Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality
title_short Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality
title_sort effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on ct colonography tagging quality
topic Abdominal Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01514-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mistrettafrancesco effectofdosesplittingofalowvolumebowelpreparationmacrogolbasedsolutiononctcolonographytaggingquality
AT damianinicolo effectofdosesplittingofalowvolumebowelpreparationmacrogolbasedsolutiononctcolonographytaggingquality
AT campanelladelia effectofdosesplittingofalowvolumebowelpreparationmacrogolbasedsolutiononctcolonographytaggingquality
AT mazzettisimone effectofdosesplittingofalowvolumebowelpreparationmacrogolbasedsolutiononctcolonographytaggingquality
AT gulinoalessia effectofdosesplittingofalowvolumebowelpreparationmacrogolbasedsolutiononctcolonographytaggingquality
AT cappellogiovanni effectofdosesplittingofalowvolumebowelpreparationmacrogolbasedsolutiononctcolonographytaggingquality
AT reggedaniele effectofdosesplittingofalowvolumebowelpreparationmacrogolbasedsolutiononctcolonographytaggingquality