Cargando…
Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting
Germline genome sequencing (GS) holds great promise for cancer prevention by identifying cancer risk and guiding prevention strategies, however research evidence is mixed regarding patient preferences for receiving GS results. The aim of this study was to discern preferences for return of results by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01069-y |
_version_ | 1784762083284353024 |
---|---|
author | Best, Megan C. Butow, Phyllis Savard, Jacqueline Jacobs, Chris Bartley, Nicole Davies, Grace Napier, Christine E. Ballinger, Mandy L. Thomas, David M. Biesecker, Barbara Tucker, Katherine M. Juraskova, Ilona Meiser, Bettina Schlub, Timothy Newson, Ainsley J. |
author_facet | Best, Megan C. Butow, Phyllis Savard, Jacqueline Jacobs, Chris Bartley, Nicole Davies, Grace Napier, Christine E. Ballinger, Mandy L. Thomas, David M. Biesecker, Barbara Tucker, Katherine M. Juraskova, Ilona Meiser, Bettina Schlub, Timothy Newson, Ainsley J. |
author_sort | Best, Megan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Germline genome sequencing (GS) holds great promise for cancer prevention by identifying cancer risk and guiding prevention strategies, however research evidence is mixed regarding patient preferences for receiving GS results. The aim of this study was to discern preferences for return of results by cancer patients who have actually undergone GS. We conducted a mixed methods study with a cohort of cancer probands (n = 335) and their genetic relatives (n = 199) undergoing GS in a research setting. Both groups completed surveys when giving consent. A subset of participants (n = 40) completed semi-structured interviews. A significantly higher percentage of probands thought people would like to be informed about genetic conditions for which there is prevention or treatment that can change cancer risk compared to conditions for which there is no prevention or treatment (93% [311] versus 65% [216]; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for relatives (91% [180] versus 61% [121]; p < 0.001). Themes identified in the analysis of interviews were: (1) Recognised benefits of GS, (2) Balancing benefits with risks, (3) Uncertain results are perceived as unhelpful and (4) Competing obligations. While utility was an important discriminator in what was seen as valuable for this cohort, there was a variety of responses. In view of varied participant preferences regarding return of results, it is important to ensure patient understanding of test validity and identify individual choices at the time of consent to GS. The nature and value of the information, and a contextual understanding of researcher obligations should guide result return. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9349221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93492212022-08-05 Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting Best, Megan C. Butow, Phyllis Savard, Jacqueline Jacobs, Chris Bartley, Nicole Davies, Grace Napier, Christine E. Ballinger, Mandy L. Thomas, David M. Biesecker, Barbara Tucker, Katherine M. Juraskova, Ilona Meiser, Bettina Schlub, Timothy Newson, Ainsley J. Eur J Hum Genet Article Germline genome sequencing (GS) holds great promise for cancer prevention by identifying cancer risk and guiding prevention strategies, however research evidence is mixed regarding patient preferences for receiving GS results. The aim of this study was to discern preferences for return of results by cancer patients who have actually undergone GS. We conducted a mixed methods study with a cohort of cancer probands (n = 335) and their genetic relatives (n = 199) undergoing GS in a research setting. Both groups completed surveys when giving consent. A subset of participants (n = 40) completed semi-structured interviews. A significantly higher percentage of probands thought people would like to be informed about genetic conditions for which there is prevention or treatment that can change cancer risk compared to conditions for which there is no prevention or treatment (93% [311] versus 65% [216]; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for relatives (91% [180] versus 61% [121]; p < 0.001). Themes identified in the analysis of interviews were: (1) Recognised benefits of GS, (2) Balancing benefits with risks, (3) Uncertain results are perceived as unhelpful and (4) Competing obligations. While utility was an important discriminator in what was seen as valuable for this cohort, there was a variety of responses. In view of varied participant preferences regarding return of results, it is important to ensure patient understanding of test validity and identify individual choices at the time of consent to GS. The nature and value of the information, and a contextual understanding of researcher obligations should guide result return. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-11 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9349221/ /pubmed/35277654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01069-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Best, Megan C. Butow, Phyllis Savard, Jacqueline Jacobs, Chris Bartley, Nicole Davies, Grace Napier, Christine E. Ballinger, Mandy L. Thomas, David M. Biesecker, Barbara Tucker, Katherine M. Juraskova, Ilona Meiser, Bettina Schlub, Timothy Newson, Ainsley J. Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting |
title | Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting |
title_full | Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting |
title_fullStr | Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting |
title_short | Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting |
title_sort | preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01069-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bestmeganc preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT butowphyllis preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT savardjacqueline preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT jacobschris preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT bartleynicole preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT daviesgrace preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT napierchristinee preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT ballingermandyl preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT thomasdavidm preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT bieseckerbarbara preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT tuckerkatherinem preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT juraskovailona preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT meiserbettina preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT schlubtimothy preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting AT newsonainsleyj preferencesforreturnofgermlinegenomesequencingresultsforcancerpatientsandtheirgeneticrelativesinaresearchsetting |