Cargando…

Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects

Acetabular defects are a challenging condition for surgeons in revision THA. A crucial aim is an anatomical restoration of the centre of rotation (COR) through grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the cup survival after biological restoration of acetabular defects in THA and the effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rohe, Sebastian, Dörr, Nicoletta, Böhle, Sabrina, Matziolis, Georg, Brodt, Steffen, Röhner, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17526-z
_version_ 1784762101497069568
author Rohe, Sebastian
Dörr, Nicoletta
Böhle, Sabrina
Matziolis, Georg
Brodt, Steffen
Röhner, Eric
author_facet Rohe, Sebastian
Dörr, Nicoletta
Böhle, Sabrina
Matziolis, Georg
Brodt, Steffen
Röhner, Eric
author_sort Rohe, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Acetabular defects are a challenging condition for surgeons in revision THA. A crucial aim is an anatomical restoration of the centre of rotation (COR) through grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the cup survival after biological restoration of acetabular defects in THA and the effect of Paprosky classification, age, BMI, and number of previous operations on cup survival. Retrospectively patients with a cup exchange and an impaction of cortico-cancellous or bulk grafts between 2009 and 2012 were included with a follow up with a minimum of 5 year. Implant failure was defined as radiographic loosening or explantation of the cup. The acetabular defect situation was classified to Paprosky. 82 patients (58 female 70.7%) were included. 26 patients were not available to contact. 56 patients (40 female 71.4%) remained for survival analysis with mean age of 75.6 ± 8 years. Survival of the cup after 5 years was 90% and after 7.8 years 88%. There was no difference in survival concerning defect classification, type of implant or graft, age, BMI, and number of previous operations. Patients on the follow up reached an HHS of 67.4 ± 19, a WOMAC Score of 33.4 ± 25.4 points and an unsatisfactory result in the SF-36. Impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects is a good option with satisfactory biomechanical results and survival for small defects. Predictive factors for cup survival could not be clarified in our study. So, the correct indication, knowing the limits of the methods and the correct choice of implant allow a defect-oriented approach and are decisive for the success of the operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9349309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93493092022-08-05 Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects Rohe, Sebastian Dörr, Nicoletta Böhle, Sabrina Matziolis, Georg Brodt, Steffen Röhner, Eric Sci Rep Article Acetabular defects are a challenging condition for surgeons in revision THA. A crucial aim is an anatomical restoration of the centre of rotation (COR) through grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the cup survival after biological restoration of acetabular defects in THA and the effect of Paprosky classification, age, BMI, and number of previous operations on cup survival. Retrospectively patients with a cup exchange and an impaction of cortico-cancellous or bulk grafts between 2009 and 2012 were included with a follow up with a minimum of 5 year. Implant failure was defined as radiographic loosening or explantation of the cup. The acetabular defect situation was classified to Paprosky. 82 patients (58 female 70.7%) were included. 26 patients were not available to contact. 56 patients (40 female 71.4%) remained for survival analysis with mean age of 75.6 ± 8 years. Survival of the cup after 5 years was 90% and after 7.8 years 88%. There was no difference in survival concerning defect classification, type of implant or graft, age, BMI, and number of previous operations. Patients on the follow up reached an HHS of 67.4 ± 19, a WOMAC Score of 33.4 ± 25.4 points and an unsatisfactory result in the SF-36. Impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects is a good option with satisfactory biomechanical results and survival for small defects. Predictive factors for cup survival could not be clarified in our study. So, the correct indication, knowing the limits of the methods and the correct choice of implant allow a defect-oriented approach and are decisive for the success of the operation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9349309/ /pubmed/35922465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17526-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rohe, Sebastian
Dörr, Nicoletta
Böhle, Sabrina
Matziolis, Georg
Brodt, Steffen
Röhner, Eric
Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects
title Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects
title_full Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects
title_fullStr Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects
title_full_unstemmed Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects
title_short Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects
title_sort mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17526-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rohesebastian midtermresultsinrevisionhiparthroplastywithimpactionbonegraftedcupreconstructionforacetabulardefects
AT dorrnicoletta midtermresultsinrevisionhiparthroplastywithimpactionbonegraftedcupreconstructionforacetabulardefects
AT bohlesabrina midtermresultsinrevisionhiparthroplastywithimpactionbonegraftedcupreconstructionforacetabulardefects
AT matziolisgeorg midtermresultsinrevisionhiparthroplastywithimpactionbonegraftedcupreconstructionforacetabulardefects
AT brodtsteffen midtermresultsinrevisionhiparthroplastywithimpactionbonegraftedcupreconstructionforacetabulardefects
AT rohnereric midtermresultsinrevisionhiparthroplastywithimpactionbonegraftedcupreconstructionforacetabulardefects