Cargando…

Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka

To determine the antibody responses elicited by different vaccines against SARS‐CoV‐2, we compared antibody responses in individuals 3 months post‐vaccination in those who had received different vaccines in Sri Lanka. Abs to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the ancestral (wild type) virus (WT) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeewandara, Chandima, Aberathna, Inoka Sepali, Danasekara, Saubhagya, Gomes, Laksiri, Fernando, Suranga, Guruge, Dinuka, Ranasinghe, Thushali, Gunasekera, Banuri, Kamaladasa, Achala, Kuruppu, Heshan, Somathilake, Gayasha, Jayamali, Jeewantha, Jayathilaka, Deshni, Wijayatilake, Helanka Dinesh Kumara, Pushpakumara, Pradeep Darshana, Harvie, Michael, Nimasha, Thashmi, de Silva, Shiromi Devika Grace, Wijayamuni, Ruwan, Schimanski, Lisa, Rijal, Pramila, Tan, Jack, Townsend, Alain, Ogg, Graham S., Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35751563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.13535
_version_ 1784762126807597056
author Jeewandara, Chandima
Aberathna, Inoka Sepali
Danasekara, Saubhagya
Gomes, Laksiri
Fernando, Suranga
Guruge, Dinuka
Ranasinghe, Thushali
Gunasekera, Banuri
Kamaladasa, Achala
Kuruppu, Heshan
Somathilake, Gayasha
Jayamali, Jeewantha
Jayathilaka, Deshni
Wijayatilake, Helanka Dinesh Kumara
Pushpakumara, Pradeep Darshana
Harvie, Michael
Nimasha, Thashmi
de Silva, Shiromi Devika Grace
Wijayamuni, Ruwan
Schimanski, Lisa
Rijal, Pramila
Tan, Jack
Townsend, Alain
Ogg, Graham S.
Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika
author_facet Jeewandara, Chandima
Aberathna, Inoka Sepali
Danasekara, Saubhagya
Gomes, Laksiri
Fernando, Suranga
Guruge, Dinuka
Ranasinghe, Thushali
Gunasekera, Banuri
Kamaladasa, Achala
Kuruppu, Heshan
Somathilake, Gayasha
Jayamali, Jeewantha
Jayathilaka, Deshni
Wijayatilake, Helanka Dinesh Kumara
Pushpakumara, Pradeep Darshana
Harvie, Michael
Nimasha, Thashmi
de Silva, Shiromi Devika Grace
Wijayamuni, Ruwan
Schimanski, Lisa
Rijal, Pramila
Tan, Jack
Townsend, Alain
Ogg, Graham S.
Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika
author_sort Jeewandara, Chandima
collection PubMed
description To determine the antibody responses elicited by different vaccines against SARS‐CoV‐2, we compared antibody responses in individuals 3 months post‐vaccination in those who had received different vaccines in Sri Lanka. Abs to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the ancestral (wild type) virus (WT) as well as to variants of concern (VoCs), and ACE2 blocking Abs, were assessed in individuals vaccinated with Moderna (n = 225), Sputnik V (n = 128) or Sputnik light (n = 184) and the results were compared with previously reported data on Sinopharm and AZD1222 vaccinees. A total of 99.5% of Moderna, >94% of AZD1222 or Sputnik V and >70% of Sputnik light, >60% of Sinopharm vaccine recipients, had a positive response to ACE2 blocking antibodies. The ACE2 blocking antibody levels were highest to lowest was Moderna > Sputnik V/AZD1222 (had equal levels) > Sputnik light > Sinopharm. All Moderna recipients had antibodies to the RBD of WT, alpha and beta, while positivity rates for delta variant was 80%. The positivity rates for Sputnik V vaccinees for the WT and VoCs were higher than for AZD1222 vaccinees while those who received Sinopharm had the lowest positivity rates (<16.7%). The total antibodies to the RBD were highest for the Sputnik V and AZD1222 vaccinees. The Moderna vaccine elicited the highest ACE2 blocking antibody levels followed by Sputnik V/AZD1222, while those who received Sinopharm had the lowest levels. These findings highlight the need for further studies to understand the effects on clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9349502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93495022022-08-04 Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka Jeewandara, Chandima Aberathna, Inoka Sepali Danasekara, Saubhagya Gomes, Laksiri Fernando, Suranga Guruge, Dinuka Ranasinghe, Thushali Gunasekera, Banuri Kamaladasa, Achala Kuruppu, Heshan Somathilake, Gayasha Jayamali, Jeewantha Jayathilaka, Deshni Wijayatilake, Helanka Dinesh Kumara Pushpakumara, Pradeep Darshana Harvie, Michael Nimasha, Thashmi de Silva, Shiromi Devika Grace Wijayamuni, Ruwan Schimanski, Lisa Rijal, Pramila Tan, Jack Townsend, Alain Ogg, Graham S. Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika Immunology Original Articles To determine the antibody responses elicited by different vaccines against SARS‐CoV‐2, we compared antibody responses in individuals 3 months post‐vaccination in those who had received different vaccines in Sri Lanka. Abs to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the ancestral (wild type) virus (WT) as well as to variants of concern (VoCs), and ACE2 blocking Abs, were assessed in individuals vaccinated with Moderna (n = 225), Sputnik V (n = 128) or Sputnik light (n = 184) and the results were compared with previously reported data on Sinopharm and AZD1222 vaccinees. A total of 99.5% of Moderna, >94% of AZD1222 or Sputnik V and >70% of Sputnik light, >60% of Sinopharm vaccine recipients, had a positive response to ACE2 blocking antibodies. The ACE2 blocking antibody levels were highest to lowest was Moderna > Sputnik V/AZD1222 (had equal levels) > Sputnik light > Sinopharm. All Moderna recipients had antibodies to the RBD of WT, alpha and beta, while positivity rates for delta variant was 80%. The positivity rates for Sputnik V vaccinees for the WT and VoCs were higher than for AZD1222 vaccinees while those who received Sinopharm had the lowest positivity rates (<16.7%). The total antibodies to the RBD were highest for the Sputnik V and AZD1222 vaccinees. The Moderna vaccine elicited the highest ACE2 blocking antibody levels followed by Sputnik V/AZD1222, while those who received Sinopharm had the lowest levels. These findings highlight the need for further studies to understand the effects on clinical outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9349502/ /pubmed/35751563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.13535 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jeewandara, Chandima
Aberathna, Inoka Sepali
Danasekara, Saubhagya
Gomes, Laksiri
Fernando, Suranga
Guruge, Dinuka
Ranasinghe, Thushali
Gunasekera, Banuri
Kamaladasa, Achala
Kuruppu, Heshan
Somathilake, Gayasha
Jayamali, Jeewantha
Jayathilaka, Deshni
Wijayatilake, Helanka Dinesh Kumara
Pushpakumara, Pradeep Darshana
Harvie, Michael
Nimasha, Thashmi
de Silva, Shiromi Devika Grace
Wijayamuni, Ruwan
Schimanski, Lisa
Rijal, Pramila
Tan, Jack
Townsend, Alain
Ogg, Graham S.
Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika
Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka
title Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka
title_full Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka
title_fullStr Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka
title_short Comparison of the immunogenicity of five COVID‐19 vaccines in Sri Lanka
title_sort comparison of the immunogenicity of five covid‐19 vaccines in sri lanka
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35751563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.13535
work_keys_str_mv AT jeewandarachandima comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT aberathnainokasepali comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT danasekarasaubhagya comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT gomeslaksiri comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT fernandosuranga comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT gurugedinuka comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT ranasinghethushali comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT gunasekerabanuri comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT kamaladasaachala comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT kuruppuheshan comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT somathilakegayasha comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT jayamalijeewantha comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT jayathilakadeshni comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT wijayatilakehelankadineshkumara comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT pushpakumarapradeepdarshana comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT harviemichael comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT nimashathashmi comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT desilvashiromidevikagrace comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT wijayamuniruwan comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT schimanskilisa comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT rijalpramila comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT tanjack comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT townsendalain comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT ogggrahams comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka
AT malavigegathsaurieneelika comparisonoftheimmunogenicityoffivecovid19vaccinesinsrilanka