Cargando…
An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
The World Health Organization has reported approximately 430 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), worldwide, including nearly 6 million deaths, since its initial appearance in China in 2019. While the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10356 |
_version_ | 1784762143936086016 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yuxuan Huang, Zhiwei Zhu, Jiajie Li, Chaonan Fang, Zhongbiao Chen, Keda Zhang, Yanjun |
author_facet | Zhang, Yuxuan Huang, Zhiwei Zhu, Jiajie Li, Chaonan Fang, Zhongbiao Chen, Keda Zhang, Yanjun |
author_sort | Zhang, Yuxuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The World Health Organization has reported approximately 430 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), worldwide, including nearly 6 million deaths, since its initial appearance in China in 2019. While the number of diagnosed cases continues to increase, the need for technologies that can accurately and rapidly detect SARS‐CoV‐2 virus infection at early phases continues to grow, and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for virtually hundreds of diagnostic tests based on nucleic acid molecules and antigen–antibody serology assays. Among them, the quantitative real‐time reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) assay is considered the gold standard for early phase virus detection. Unfortunately, qRT‐PCR still suffers from disadvantages such as the complex test process and the occurrence of false negatives; therefore, new nucleic acid detection devices and serological testing technologies are being developed. However, because of the emergence of strongly infectious mutants of the new coronavirus, such as Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529), the need for the specific detection of mutant strains is also increasing. Therefore, this article reviews nucleic acid‐ and antigen–antibody‐based serological assays, and compares the performance of some of the most recent FDA‐approved and literature‐reported assays and associated kits for the specific testing of new coronavirus variants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9349698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93496982022-08-04 An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic Zhang, Yuxuan Huang, Zhiwei Zhu, Jiajie Li, Chaonan Fang, Zhongbiao Chen, Keda Zhang, Yanjun Bioeng Transl Med Review Articles The World Health Organization has reported approximately 430 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), worldwide, including nearly 6 million deaths, since its initial appearance in China in 2019. While the number of diagnosed cases continues to increase, the need for technologies that can accurately and rapidly detect SARS‐CoV‐2 virus infection at early phases continues to grow, and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for virtually hundreds of diagnostic tests based on nucleic acid molecules and antigen–antibody serology assays. Among them, the quantitative real‐time reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) assay is considered the gold standard for early phase virus detection. Unfortunately, qRT‐PCR still suffers from disadvantages such as the complex test process and the occurrence of false negatives; therefore, new nucleic acid detection devices and serological testing technologies are being developed. However, because of the emergence of strongly infectious mutants of the new coronavirus, such as Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529), the need for the specific detection of mutant strains is also increasing. Therefore, this article reviews nucleic acid‐ and antigen–antibody‐based serological assays, and compares the performance of some of the most recent FDA‐approved and literature‐reported assays and associated kits for the specific testing of new coronavirus variants. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9349698/ /pubmed/35942232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10356 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Zhang, Yuxuan Huang, Zhiwei Zhu, Jiajie Li, Chaonan Fang, Zhongbiao Chen, Keda Zhang, Yanjun An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic |
title | An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic |
title_full | An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic |
title_fullStr | An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic |
title_short | An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic |
title_sort | updated review of sars‐cov‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuxuan anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT huangzhiwei anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT zhujiajie anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT lichaonan anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT fangzhongbiao anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT chenkeda anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT zhangyanjun anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT zhangyuxuan updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT huangzhiwei updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT zhujiajie updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT lichaonan updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT fangzhongbiao updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT chenkeda updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic AT zhangyanjun updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic |