Cargando…

An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic

The World Health Organization has reported approximately 430 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), worldwide, including nearly 6 million deaths, since its initial appearance in China in 2019. While the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yuxuan, Huang, Zhiwei, Zhu, Jiajie, Li, Chaonan, Fang, Zhongbiao, Chen, Keda, Zhang, Yanjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10356
_version_ 1784762143936086016
author Zhang, Yuxuan
Huang, Zhiwei
Zhu, Jiajie
Li, Chaonan
Fang, Zhongbiao
Chen, Keda
Zhang, Yanjun
author_facet Zhang, Yuxuan
Huang, Zhiwei
Zhu, Jiajie
Li, Chaonan
Fang, Zhongbiao
Chen, Keda
Zhang, Yanjun
author_sort Zhang, Yuxuan
collection PubMed
description The World Health Organization has reported approximately 430 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), worldwide, including nearly 6 million deaths, since its initial appearance in China in 2019. While the number of diagnosed cases continues to increase, the need for technologies that can accurately and rapidly detect SARS‐CoV‐2 virus infection at early phases continues to grow, and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for virtually hundreds of diagnostic tests based on nucleic acid molecules and antigen–antibody serology assays. Among them, the quantitative real‐time reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) assay is considered the gold standard for early phase virus detection. Unfortunately, qRT‐PCR still suffers from disadvantages such as the complex test process and the occurrence of false negatives; therefore, new nucleic acid detection devices and serological testing technologies are being developed. However, because of the emergence of strongly infectious mutants of the new coronavirus, such as Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529), the need for the specific detection of mutant strains is also increasing. Therefore, this article reviews nucleic acid‐ and antigen–antibody‐based serological assays, and compares the performance of some of the most recent FDA‐approved and literature‐reported assays and associated kits for the specific testing of new coronavirus variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9349698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93496982022-08-04 An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic Zhang, Yuxuan Huang, Zhiwei Zhu, Jiajie Li, Chaonan Fang, Zhongbiao Chen, Keda Zhang, Yanjun Bioeng Transl Med Review Articles The World Health Organization has reported approximately 430 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), worldwide, including nearly 6 million deaths, since its initial appearance in China in 2019. While the number of diagnosed cases continues to increase, the need for technologies that can accurately and rapidly detect SARS‐CoV‐2 virus infection at early phases continues to grow, and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for virtually hundreds of diagnostic tests based on nucleic acid molecules and antigen–antibody serology assays. Among them, the quantitative real‐time reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR) assay is considered the gold standard for early phase virus detection. Unfortunately, qRT‐PCR still suffers from disadvantages such as the complex test process and the occurrence of false negatives; therefore, new nucleic acid detection devices and serological testing technologies are being developed. However, because of the emergence of strongly infectious mutants of the new coronavirus, such as Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529), the need for the specific detection of mutant strains is also increasing. Therefore, this article reviews nucleic acid‐ and antigen–antibody‐based serological assays, and compares the performance of some of the most recent FDA‐approved and literature‐reported assays and associated kits for the specific testing of new coronavirus variants. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9349698/ /pubmed/35942232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10356 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Zhang, Yuxuan
Huang, Zhiwei
Zhu, Jiajie
Li, Chaonan
Fang, Zhongbiao
Chen, Keda
Zhang, Yanjun
An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
title An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
title_full An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
title_fullStr An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
title_full_unstemmed An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
title_short An updated review of SARS‐CoV‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
title_sort updated review of sars‐cov‐2 detection methods in the context of a novel coronavirus pandemic
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10356
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuxuan anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT huangzhiwei anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT zhujiajie anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT lichaonan anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT fangzhongbiao anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT chenkeda anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT zhangyanjun anupdatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT zhangyuxuan updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT huangzhiwei updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT zhujiajie updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT lichaonan updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT fangzhongbiao updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT chenkeda updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic
AT zhangyanjun updatedreviewofsarscov2detectionmethodsinthecontextofanovelcoronaviruspandemic