Cargando…
NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
BACKGROUND: Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website. OBJECTIVES: (1) To do...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12444 |
_version_ | 1784762194028658688 |
---|---|
author | Gorring, Hélène Divall, Pip Gardner, Sarah Gray, Anne McLaren, Alison Snell, Lindsay Thackeray, Eva Tocock, Adam Young, Gil |
author_facet | Gorring, Hélène Divall, Pip Gardner, Sarah Gray, Anne McLaren, Alison Snell, Lindsay Thackeray, Eva Tocock, Adam Young, Gil |
author_sort | Gorring, Hélène |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website. OBJECTIVES: (1) To document the origins of the COVID‐19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further. METHODS: Structured interviews with the peer reviewers (n = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken. RESULTS: The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments. DISCUSSION: Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors. CONCLUSION: Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9350244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93502442022-08-04 NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation Gorring, Hélène Divall, Pip Gardner, Sarah Gray, Anne McLaren, Alison Snell, Lindsay Thackeray, Eva Tocock, Adam Young, Gil Health Info Libr J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website. OBJECTIVES: (1) To document the origins of the COVID‐19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further. METHODS: Structured interviews with the peer reviewers (n = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken. RESULTS: The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments. DISCUSSION: Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors. CONCLUSION: Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9350244/ /pubmed/35808921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12444 Text en © 2022 The Authors Health Information and Libraries Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Health Libraries Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gorring, Hélène Divall, Pip Gardner, Sarah Gray, Anne McLaren, Alison Snell, Lindsay Thackeray, Eva Tocock, Adam Young, Gil NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation |
title | NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation |
title_full | NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation |
title_fullStr | NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation |
title_short | NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation |
title_sort | nhs librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing covid‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorringhelene nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT divallpip nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT gardnersarah nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT grayanne nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT mclarenalison nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT snelllindsay nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT thackerayeva nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT tocockadam nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation AT younggil nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation |