Cargando…

NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation

BACKGROUND: Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website. OBJECTIVES: (1) To do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorring, Hélène, Divall, Pip, Gardner, Sarah, Gray, Anne, McLaren, Alison, Snell, Lindsay, Thackeray, Eva, Tocock, Adam, Young, Gil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12444
_version_ 1784762194028658688
author Gorring, Hélène
Divall, Pip
Gardner, Sarah
Gray, Anne
McLaren, Alison
Snell, Lindsay
Thackeray, Eva
Tocock, Adam
Young, Gil
author_facet Gorring, Hélène
Divall, Pip
Gardner, Sarah
Gray, Anne
McLaren, Alison
Snell, Lindsay
Thackeray, Eva
Tocock, Adam
Young, Gil
author_sort Gorring, Hélène
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website. OBJECTIVES: (1) To document the origins of the COVID‐19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further. METHODS: Structured interviews with the peer reviewers (n = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken. RESULTS: The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments. DISCUSSION: Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors. CONCLUSION: Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9350244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93502442022-08-04 NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation Gorring, Hélène Divall, Pip Gardner, Sarah Gray, Anne McLaren, Alison Snell, Lindsay Thackeray, Eva Tocock, Adam Young, Gil Health Info Libr J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website. OBJECTIVES: (1) To document the origins of the COVID‐19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further. METHODS: Structured interviews with the peer reviewers (n = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken. RESULTS: The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments. DISCUSSION: Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors. CONCLUSION: Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9350244/ /pubmed/35808921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12444 Text en © 2022 The Authors Health Information and Libraries Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Health Libraries Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gorring, Hélène
Divall, Pip
Gardner, Sarah
Gray, Anne
McLaren, Alison
Snell, Lindsay
Thackeray, Eva
Tocock, Adam
Young, Gil
NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
title NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
title_full NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
title_fullStr NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
title_full_unstemmed NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
title_short NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
title_sort nhs librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing covid‐19 searches ‐ an evaluation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12444
work_keys_str_mv AT gorringhelene nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT divallpip nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT gardnersarah nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT grayanne nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT mclarenalison nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT snelllindsay nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT thackerayeva nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT tocockadam nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation
AT younggil nhslibrarianscollaboratetodevelopasearchbankpeerreviewingandsharingcovid19searchesanevaluation