Cargando…

The association of pancreatic cancer incidence with smoking status and smoking amount in Korean men

OBJECTIVES: Our study examined the dose-response relationship between smoking amounts (pack-years) and the risk of developing pancreatic cancer in Korean men. METHODS: Of 125,743 participants who underwent medical health checkups in 2009, 121,408 were included in the final analysis and observed for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Do Jin, Oh, Chang-Mo, Ha, Eunhee, Kim, Min-Ho, Yang, Eun Hye, Lee, Hyo Choon, Shin, Soon Su, Hwang, Woo Yeon, You, Ann Hee, Ryoo, Jae-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Epidemiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468271
http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2022040
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Our study examined the dose-response relationship between smoking amounts (pack-years) and the risk of developing pancreatic cancer in Korean men. METHODS: Of 125,743 participants who underwent medical health checkups in 2009, 121,408 were included in the final analysis and observed for the development of pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the associations between smoking amounts and incident pancreatic cancer in 4 groups classified by pack-year amounts. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident pancreatic cancer by comparing groups 2 (<20 pack-year smokers), 3 (20-≤40 pack-year smokers), and 4 (>40 pack-year smokers) with group 1 (never smokers). RESULTS: During 527,974.5 person-years of follow-up, 245 incident cases of pancreatic cancer developed between 2009 and 2013. The multivariate-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for incident pancreatic cancer in groups 2, 3, and 4 were 1.05 (0.76 to 1.45), 1.28 (0.91 to 1.80), and 1.57 (1.00 to 2.46), respectively (p for trend=0.025). The HR (95% CI) of former smokers showed a dose-response relationship in the unadjusted model, but did not show a statistically significant association in the multivariate-adjusted model. The HR (95% CI) of current smokers showed a dose-response relationship in both the unadjusted (p for trend=0.020) and multivariate-adjusted models (p for trend=0.050). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing pancreatic cancer was higher in current smokers status than in former smokers among Korean men, indicating that smoking cessation may have a protective effect.