Cargando…
Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
AIMS: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) treatment changed since the introduction of denosumab from purely surgical towards a multidisciplinary approach, with recent concerns of higher recurrence rates after denosumab. We evaluated oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes for distal radius GCTB,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0064.R1 |
_version_ | 1784762279478165504 |
---|---|
author | van der Heijden, Lizz Bindt, Sjaan Scorianz, Maurizio Ng, Colin Gibbons, Max C. L. H. van de Sande, Michiel A. J. Campanacci, Domenico A. |
author_facet | van der Heijden, Lizz Bindt, Sjaan Scorianz, Maurizio Ng, Colin Gibbons, Max C. L. H. van de Sande, Michiel A. J. Campanacci, Domenico A. |
author_sort | van der Heijden, Lizz |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) treatment changed since the introduction of denosumab from purely surgical towards a multidisciplinary approach, with recent concerns of higher recurrence rates after denosumab. We evaluated oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes for distal radius GCTB, with a critically appraised systematic literature review. METHODS: We included 76 patients with distal radius GCTB in three sarcoma centres (1990 to 2019). Median follow-up was 8.8 years (2 to 23). Seven patients underwent curettage, 38 curettage with adjuvants, and 31 resection; 20 had denosumab. RESULTS: Recurrence rate was 71% (5/7) after curettage, 32% (12/38) after curettage with adjuvants, and 6% (2/31) after resection. Median time to recurrence was 17 months (4 to 77). Recurrences were treated with curettage with adjuvants (11), resection (six), or curettage (two). Overall, 84% (38/45) was cured after one to thee intralesional procedures. Seven patients had 12 months neoadjuvant denosumab (5 to 15) and sixmonths adjuvant denosumab; two recurred (29%). Twelve patients had six months neoadjuvant denosumab (4 to 10); five recurred (42%). Two had pulmonary metastases (2.6%), both stable after denosumab. Complication rate was 18% (14/76, with 11 requiring surgery). At follow-up, median MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society score was 28 (18 to 30), median Short Form-36 Health Survey was 86 (41 to 95), and median Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand was 7.8 (0 to 58). CONCLUSION: Distal radius GCTB treatment might deviate from general GCTB treatment because of complexity of wrist anatomy and function. Novel insights on surgical treatment are presented in this multicentre study and systematic review. Intralesional surgery resulted in high recurrence-rate for distal radius GCTB, also with additional denosumab. The large majority of patients however, were cured after repeated curettage. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):515–528. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9350701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93507012022-08-15 Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature van der Heijden, Lizz Bindt, Sjaan Scorianz, Maurizio Ng, Colin Gibbons, Max C. L. H. van de Sande, Michiel A. J. Campanacci, Domenico A. Bone Jt Open Systematic Review AIMS: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) treatment changed since the introduction of denosumab from purely surgical towards a multidisciplinary approach, with recent concerns of higher recurrence rates after denosumab. We evaluated oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes for distal radius GCTB, with a critically appraised systematic literature review. METHODS: We included 76 patients with distal radius GCTB in three sarcoma centres (1990 to 2019). Median follow-up was 8.8 years (2 to 23). Seven patients underwent curettage, 38 curettage with adjuvants, and 31 resection; 20 had denosumab. RESULTS: Recurrence rate was 71% (5/7) after curettage, 32% (12/38) after curettage with adjuvants, and 6% (2/31) after resection. Median time to recurrence was 17 months (4 to 77). Recurrences were treated with curettage with adjuvants (11), resection (six), or curettage (two). Overall, 84% (38/45) was cured after one to thee intralesional procedures. Seven patients had 12 months neoadjuvant denosumab (5 to 15) and sixmonths adjuvant denosumab; two recurred (29%). Twelve patients had six months neoadjuvant denosumab (4 to 10); five recurred (42%). Two had pulmonary metastases (2.6%), both stable after denosumab. Complication rate was 18% (14/76, with 11 requiring surgery). At follow-up, median MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society score was 28 (18 to 30), median Short Form-36 Health Survey was 86 (41 to 95), and median Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand was 7.8 (0 to 58). CONCLUSION: Distal radius GCTB treatment might deviate from general GCTB treatment because of complexity of wrist anatomy and function. Novel insights on surgical treatment are presented in this multicentre study and systematic review. Intralesional surgery resulted in high recurrence-rate for distal radius GCTB, also with additional denosumab. The large majority of patients however, were cured after repeated curettage. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):515–528. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9350701/ /pubmed/35775196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0064.R1 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review van der Heijden, Lizz Bindt, Sjaan Scorianz, Maurizio Ng, Colin Gibbons, Max C. L. H. van de Sande, Michiel A. J. Campanacci, Domenico A. Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature |
title | Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature |
title_full | Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature |
title_short | Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0064.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderheijdenlizz surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature AT bindtsjaan surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature AT scorianzmaurizio surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature AT ngcolin surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature AT gibbonsmaxclh surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature AT vandesandemichielaj surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature AT campanaccidomenicoa surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature |