Cargando…

Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature

AIMS: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) treatment changed since the introduction of denosumab from purely surgical towards a multidisciplinary approach, with recent concerns of higher recurrence rates after denosumab. We evaluated oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes for distal radius GCTB,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Heijden, Lizz, Bindt, Sjaan, Scorianz, Maurizio, Ng, Colin, Gibbons, Max C. L. H., van de Sande, Michiel A. J., Campanacci, Domenico A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0064.R1
_version_ 1784762279478165504
author van der Heijden, Lizz
Bindt, Sjaan
Scorianz, Maurizio
Ng, Colin
Gibbons, Max C. L. H.
van de Sande, Michiel A. J.
Campanacci, Domenico A.
author_facet van der Heijden, Lizz
Bindt, Sjaan
Scorianz, Maurizio
Ng, Colin
Gibbons, Max C. L. H.
van de Sande, Michiel A. J.
Campanacci, Domenico A.
author_sort van der Heijden, Lizz
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) treatment changed since the introduction of denosumab from purely surgical towards a multidisciplinary approach, with recent concerns of higher recurrence rates after denosumab. We evaluated oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes for distal radius GCTB, with a critically appraised systematic literature review. METHODS: We included 76 patients with distal radius GCTB in three sarcoma centres (1990 to 2019). Median follow-up was 8.8 years (2 to 23). Seven patients underwent curettage, 38 curettage with adjuvants, and 31 resection; 20 had denosumab. RESULTS: Recurrence rate was 71% (5/7) after curettage, 32% (12/38) after curettage with adjuvants, and 6% (2/31) after resection. Median time to recurrence was 17 months (4 to 77). Recurrences were treated with curettage with adjuvants (11), resection (six), or curettage (two). Overall, 84% (38/45) was cured after one to thee intralesional procedures. Seven patients had 12 months neoadjuvant denosumab (5 to 15) and sixmonths adjuvant denosumab; two recurred (29%). Twelve patients had six months neoadjuvant denosumab (4 to 10); five recurred (42%). Two had pulmonary metastases (2.6%), both stable after denosumab. Complication rate was 18% (14/76, with 11 requiring surgery). At follow-up, median MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society score was 28 (18 to 30), median Short Form-36 Health Survey was 86 (41 to 95), and median Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand was 7.8 (0 to 58). CONCLUSION: Distal radius GCTB treatment might deviate from general GCTB treatment because of complexity of wrist anatomy and function. Novel insights on surgical treatment are presented in this multicentre study and systematic review. Intralesional surgery resulted in high recurrence-rate for distal radius GCTB, also with additional denosumab. The large majority of patients however, were cured after repeated curettage. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):515–528.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9350701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93507012022-08-15 Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature van der Heijden, Lizz Bindt, Sjaan Scorianz, Maurizio Ng, Colin Gibbons, Max C. L. H. van de Sande, Michiel A. J. Campanacci, Domenico A. Bone Jt Open Systematic Review AIMS: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) treatment changed since the introduction of denosumab from purely surgical towards a multidisciplinary approach, with recent concerns of higher recurrence rates after denosumab. We evaluated oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes for distal radius GCTB, with a critically appraised systematic literature review. METHODS: We included 76 patients with distal radius GCTB in three sarcoma centres (1990 to 2019). Median follow-up was 8.8 years (2 to 23). Seven patients underwent curettage, 38 curettage with adjuvants, and 31 resection; 20 had denosumab. RESULTS: Recurrence rate was 71% (5/7) after curettage, 32% (12/38) after curettage with adjuvants, and 6% (2/31) after resection. Median time to recurrence was 17 months (4 to 77). Recurrences were treated with curettage with adjuvants (11), resection (six), or curettage (two). Overall, 84% (38/45) was cured after one to thee intralesional procedures. Seven patients had 12 months neoadjuvant denosumab (5 to 15) and sixmonths adjuvant denosumab; two recurred (29%). Twelve patients had six months neoadjuvant denosumab (4 to 10); five recurred (42%). Two had pulmonary metastases (2.6%), both stable after denosumab. Complication rate was 18% (14/76, with 11 requiring surgery). At follow-up, median MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society score was 28 (18 to 30), median Short Form-36 Health Survey was 86 (41 to 95), and median Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand was 7.8 (0 to 58). CONCLUSION: Distal radius GCTB treatment might deviate from general GCTB treatment because of complexity of wrist anatomy and function. Novel insights on surgical treatment are presented in this multicentre study and systematic review. Intralesional surgery resulted in high recurrence-rate for distal radius GCTB, also with additional denosumab. The large majority of patients however, were cured after repeated curettage. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):515–528. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9350701/ /pubmed/35775196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0064.R1 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Review
van der Heijden, Lizz
Bindt, Sjaan
Scorianz, Maurizio
Ng, Colin
Gibbons, Max C. L. H.
van de Sande, Michiel A. J.
Campanacci, Domenico A.
Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
title Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
title_full Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
title_short Surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
title_sort surgical challenges, novel techniques, and systemic treatment of giant cell tumour of bone of the distal radius: clinical outcomes and systematic review of the literature
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0064.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderheijdenlizz surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT bindtsjaan surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT scorianzmaurizio surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT ngcolin surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gibbonsmaxclh surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT vandesandemichielaj surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT campanaccidomenicoa surgicalchallengesnoveltechniquesandsystemictreatmentofgiantcelltumourofboneofthedistalradiusclinicaloutcomesandsystematicreviewoftheliterature