Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
BACKGROUND: Collagen membrane and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have emerged as vital biomaterials in the field of periodontal regeneration. Minimally invasive techniques are being preferred by most periodontists, as it is patient compliant with fewer post-surgical complications as compared to conventi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157336 http://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68 |
_version_ | 1784762283716509696 |
---|---|
author | Patra, Laxmikanta Raj, Subash Chandra Katti, Neelima Mohanty, Devapratim Pradhan, Shib Shankar Tabassum, Shaheda Mishra, Asit Kumar Patnaik, Kaushik Mahapatra, Annuroopa |
author_facet | Patra, Laxmikanta Raj, Subash Chandra Katti, Neelima Mohanty, Devapratim Pradhan, Shib Shankar Tabassum, Shaheda Mishra, Asit Kumar Patnaik, Kaushik Mahapatra, Annuroopa |
author_sort | Patra, Laxmikanta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Collagen membrane and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have emerged as vital biomaterials in the field of periodontal regeneration. Minimally invasive techniques are being preferred by most periodontists, as it is patient compliant with fewer post-surgical complications as compared to conventional surgical techniques. Thus, in this study we have evaluated the effect of injectable PRF (i-PRF) with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone using vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique for gingival recession coverage. AIM: To compare the efficacy of VISTA using collagen membrane with collagen membrane soaked in injectable PRF for gingival recession coverage. METHODS: A split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was designed;13 subjects having at least 2 teeth indicated for recession coverage were enrolled in this study. The sites were randomly assigned to control group (VISTA using collagen membrane alone) and the test group (VISTA using collagen membrane with i-PRF). The clinical parameters assessed were pocket depth, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), relative attachment level, keratinised tissue width (KTW), keratinised tissue thickness (KTT), and percentage root coverage. RESULTS: RD showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (0.5 ± 0.513) and 6 mo (0.9 ± 0.641) and the control group at 3 mo (0.95 ± 0.51) and 6 mo (1.5 ± 0.571), with P values of 0.008 and 0.04, respectively. RW also showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (1 ± 1.026) and 6 mo (1.65 ± 1.04) and the control group at 3 mo (1.85 ± 0.875) and 6 mo (2.25 ± 0.759), with P values of 0.008 and 0.001, respectively. Results for KTW showed statistically significant results between the test group at 1 mo (2.85 ± 0.489), 3 mo (3.5 ± 0.513), and 6 mo (3.4 ± 0.598) and the control group at 1 mo (2.45 ± 0.605), 3 mo (2.9 ± 0.447), and 6 mo (2.75 ± 0.444), with P values of 0.04, 0.004, and 0.003, respectively. Results for KTT also showed statistically significant results between test group at 1 mo (2.69 ± 0.233), 3 mo (2.53 ± 0.212), and 6 mo (2.46 ± 0.252) and the control group at 1 mo (2.12 ± 0.193), 3 mo (2.02 ± 0.18), and 6 mo (1.91 ± 0.166), with P values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. The test group showed 91.6%, 81.6%, and 67% root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, while the control group showed 82.3%, 66.4%, and 53.95% of root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive VISTA technique along with collagen membrane and injectable form of platelet-rich fibrin can be successfully used as a treatment method for multiple or isolated gingival recessions of Miller’s class-I and class-II defects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9350719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93507192022-09-23 Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage Patra, Laxmikanta Raj, Subash Chandra Katti, Neelima Mohanty, Devapratim Pradhan, Shib Shankar Tabassum, Shaheda Mishra, Asit Kumar Patnaik, Kaushik Mahapatra, Annuroopa World J Exp Med Randomized Controlled Trial BACKGROUND: Collagen membrane and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have emerged as vital biomaterials in the field of periodontal regeneration. Minimally invasive techniques are being preferred by most periodontists, as it is patient compliant with fewer post-surgical complications as compared to conventional surgical techniques. Thus, in this study we have evaluated the effect of injectable PRF (i-PRF) with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone using vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique for gingival recession coverage. AIM: To compare the efficacy of VISTA using collagen membrane with collagen membrane soaked in injectable PRF for gingival recession coverage. METHODS: A split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was designed;13 subjects having at least 2 teeth indicated for recession coverage were enrolled in this study. The sites were randomly assigned to control group (VISTA using collagen membrane alone) and the test group (VISTA using collagen membrane with i-PRF). The clinical parameters assessed were pocket depth, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), relative attachment level, keratinised tissue width (KTW), keratinised tissue thickness (KTT), and percentage root coverage. RESULTS: RD showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (0.5 ± 0.513) and 6 mo (0.9 ± 0.641) and the control group at 3 mo (0.95 ± 0.51) and 6 mo (1.5 ± 0.571), with P values of 0.008 and 0.04, respectively. RW also showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (1 ± 1.026) and 6 mo (1.65 ± 1.04) and the control group at 3 mo (1.85 ± 0.875) and 6 mo (2.25 ± 0.759), with P values of 0.008 and 0.001, respectively. Results for KTW showed statistically significant results between the test group at 1 mo (2.85 ± 0.489), 3 mo (3.5 ± 0.513), and 6 mo (3.4 ± 0.598) and the control group at 1 mo (2.45 ± 0.605), 3 mo (2.9 ± 0.447), and 6 mo (2.75 ± 0.444), with P values of 0.04, 0.004, and 0.003, respectively. Results for KTT also showed statistically significant results between test group at 1 mo (2.69 ± 0.233), 3 mo (2.53 ± 0.212), and 6 mo (2.46 ± 0.252) and the control group at 1 mo (2.12 ± 0.193), 3 mo (2.02 ± 0.18), and 6 mo (1.91 ± 0.166), with P values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. The test group showed 91.6%, 81.6%, and 67% root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, while the control group showed 82.3%, 66.4%, and 53.95% of root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive VISTA technique along with collagen membrane and injectable form of platelet-rich fibrin can be successfully used as a treatment method for multiple or isolated gingival recessions of Miller’s class-I and class-II defects. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9350719/ /pubmed/36157336 http://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Randomized Controlled Trial Patra, Laxmikanta Raj, Subash Chandra Katti, Neelima Mohanty, Devapratim Pradhan, Shib Shankar Tabassum, Shaheda Mishra, Asit Kumar Patnaik, Kaushik Mahapatra, Annuroopa Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage |
title | Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage |
topic | Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157336 http://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patralaxmikanta comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT rajsubashchandra comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT kattineelima comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT mohantydevapratim comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT pradhanshibshankar comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT tabassumshaheda comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT mishraasitkumar comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT patnaikkaushik comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage AT mahapatraannuroopa comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage |