Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage

BACKGROUND: Collagen membrane and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have emerged as vital biomaterials in the field of periodontal regeneration. Minimally invasive techniques are being preferred by most periodontists, as it is patient compliant with fewer post-surgical complications as compared to conventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patra, Laxmikanta, Raj, Subash Chandra, Katti, Neelima, Mohanty, Devapratim, Pradhan, Shib Shankar, Tabassum, Shaheda, Mishra, Asit Kumar, Patnaik, Kaushik, Mahapatra, Annuroopa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157336
http://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68
_version_ 1784762283716509696
author Patra, Laxmikanta
Raj, Subash Chandra
Katti, Neelima
Mohanty, Devapratim
Pradhan, Shib Shankar
Tabassum, Shaheda
Mishra, Asit Kumar
Patnaik, Kaushik
Mahapatra, Annuroopa
author_facet Patra, Laxmikanta
Raj, Subash Chandra
Katti, Neelima
Mohanty, Devapratim
Pradhan, Shib Shankar
Tabassum, Shaheda
Mishra, Asit Kumar
Patnaik, Kaushik
Mahapatra, Annuroopa
author_sort Patra, Laxmikanta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Collagen membrane and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have emerged as vital biomaterials in the field of periodontal regeneration. Minimally invasive techniques are being preferred by most periodontists, as it is patient compliant with fewer post-surgical complications as compared to conventional surgical techniques. Thus, in this study we have evaluated the effect of injectable PRF (i-PRF) with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone using vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique for gingival recession coverage. AIM: To compare the efficacy of VISTA using collagen membrane with collagen membrane soaked in injectable PRF for gingival recession coverage. METHODS: A split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was designed;13 subjects having at least 2 teeth indicated for recession coverage were enrolled in this study. The sites were randomly assigned to control group (VISTA using collagen membrane alone) and the test group (VISTA using collagen membrane with i-PRF). The clinical parameters assessed were pocket depth, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), relative attachment level, keratinised tissue width (KTW), keratinised tissue thickness (KTT), and percentage root coverage. RESULTS: RD showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (0.5 ± 0.513) and 6 mo (0.9 ± 0.641) and the control group at 3 mo (0.95 ± 0.51) and 6 mo (1.5 ± 0.571), with P values of 0.008 and 0.04, respectively. RW also showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (1 ± 1.026) and 6 mo (1.65 ± 1.04) and the control group at 3 mo (1.85 ± 0.875) and 6 mo (2.25 ± 0.759), with P values of 0.008 and 0.001, respectively. Results for KTW showed statistically significant results between the test group at 1 mo (2.85 ± 0.489), 3 mo (3.5 ± 0.513), and 6 mo (3.4 ± 0.598) and the control group at 1 mo (2.45 ± 0.605), 3 mo (2.9 ± 0.447), and 6 mo (2.75 ± 0.444), with P values of 0.04, 0.004, and 0.003, respectively. Results for KTT also showed statistically significant results between test group at 1 mo (2.69 ± 0.233), 3 mo (2.53 ± 0.212), and 6 mo (2.46 ± 0.252) and the control group at 1 mo (2.12 ± 0.193), 3 mo (2.02 ± 0.18), and 6 mo (1.91 ± 0.166), with P values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. The test group showed 91.6%, 81.6%, and 67% root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, while the control group showed 82.3%, 66.4%, and 53.95% of root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive VISTA technique along with collagen membrane and injectable form of platelet-rich fibrin can be successfully used as a treatment method for multiple or isolated gingival recessions of Miller’s class-I and class-II defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9350719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93507192022-09-23 Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage Patra, Laxmikanta Raj, Subash Chandra Katti, Neelima Mohanty, Devapratim Pradhan, Shib Shankar Tabassum, Shaheda Mishra, Asit Kumar Patnaik, Kaushik Mahapatra, Annuroopa World J Exp Med Randomized Controlled Trial BACKGROUND: Collagen membrane and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have emerged as vital biomaterials in the field of periodontal regeneration. Minimally invasive techniques are being preferred by most periodontists, as it is patient compliant with fewer post-surgical complications as compared to conventional surgical techniques. Thus, in this study we have evaluated the effect of injectable PRF (i-PRF) with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone using vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique for gingival recession coverage. AIM: To compare the efficacy of VISTA using collagen membrane with collagen membrane soaked in injectable PRF for gingival recession coverage. METHODS: A split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was designed;13 subjects having at least 2 teeth indicated for recession coverage were enrolled in this study. The sites were randomly assigned to control group (VISTA using collagen membrane alone) and the test group (VISTA using collagen membrane with i-PRF). The clinical parameters assessed were pocket depth, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), relative attachment level, keratinised tissue width (KTW), keratinised tissue thickness (KTT), and percentage root coverage. RESULTS: RD showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (0.5 ± 0.513) and 6 mo (0.9 ± 0.641) and the control group at 3 mo (0.95 ± 0.51) and 6 mo (1.5 ± 0.571), with P values of 0.008 and 0.04, respectively. RW also showed a statistically significant difference between the test group at 3 mo (1 ± 1.026) and 6 mo (1.65 ± 1.04) and the control group at 3 mo (1.85 ± 0.875) and 6 mo (2.25 ± 0.759), with P values of 0.008 and 0.001, respectively. Results for KTW showed statistically significant results between the test group at 1 mo (2.85 ± 0.489), 3 mo (3.5 ± 0.513), and 6 mo (3.4 ± 0.598) and the control group at 1 mo (2.45 ± 0.605), 3 mo (2.9 ± 0.447), and 6 mo (2.75 ± 0.444), with P values of 0.04, 0.004, and 0.003, respectively. Results for KTT also showed statistically significant results between test group at 1 mo (2.69 ± 0.233), 3 mo (2.53 ± 0.212), and 6 mo (2.46 ± 0.252) and the control group at 1 mo (2.12 ± 0.193), 3 mo (2.02 ± 0.18), and 6 mo (1.91 ± 0.166), with P values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. The test group showed 91.6%, 81.6%, and 67% root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, while the control group showed 82.3%, 66.4%, and 53.95% of root coverage at 1 mo, 3 mo, and 6 mo, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive VISTA technique along with collagen membrane and injectable form of platelet-rich fibrin can be successfully used as a treatment method for multiple or isolated gingival recessions of Miller’s class-I and class-II defects. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9350719/ /pubmed/36157336 http://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Randomized Controlled Trial
Patra, Laxmikanta
Raj, Subash Chandra
Katti, Neelima
Mohanty, Devapratim
Pradhan, Shib Shankar
Tabassum, Shaheda
Mishra, Asit Kumar
Patnaik, Kaushik
Mahapatra, Annuroopa
Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
title Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
title_full Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
title_short Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
title_sort comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage
topic Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157336
http://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68
work_keys_str_mv AT patralaxmikanta comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT rajsubashchandra comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT kattineelima comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT mohantydevapratim comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT pradhanshibshankar comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT tabassumshaheda comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT mishraasitkumar comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT patnaikkaushik comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage
AT mahapatraannuroopa comparativeevaluationofeffectofinjectableplateletrichfibrinwithcollagenmembranecomparedwithcollagenmembranealoneforgingivalrecessioncoverage