Cargando…

Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study

BACKGROUND: Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clavier, Thomas, Occhiali, Emilie, Guenet, Claire, Vannier, Naurine, Hache, Camille, Compere, Vincent, Selim, Jean, Besnier, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35857379
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34549
_version_ 1784762308685201408
author Clavier, Thomas
Occhiali, Emilie
Guenet, Claire
Vannier, Naurine
Hache, Camille
Compere, Vincent
Selim, Jean
Besnier, Emmanuel
author_facet Clavier, Thomas
Occhiali, Emilie
Guenet, Claire
Vannier, Naurine
Hache, Camille
Compere, Vincent
Selim, Jean
Besnier, Emmanuel
author_sort Clavier, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national anesthesia societies on SNs. METHODS: This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anesthesia society on the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists website. RESULTS: Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1%), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2%), YouTube (n=26, 19.1%), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8%) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2%) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (r=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; P<.001), Instagram (r=0.83, 95% CI 0.58-0.94; P<.001), and YouTube (r=0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; P<.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9350816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93508162022-08-05 Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study Clavier, Thomas Occhiali, Emilie Guenet, Claire Vannier, Naurine Hache, Camille Compere, Vincent Selim, Jean Besnier, Emmanuel JMIR Perioper Med Viewpoint BACKGROUND: Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national anesthesia societies on SNs. METHODS: This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anesthesia society on the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists website. RESULTS: Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1%), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2%), YouTube (n=26, 19.1%), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8%) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2%) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (r=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; P<.001), Instagram (r=0.83, 95% CI 0.58-0.94; P<.001), and YouTube (r=0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; P<.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs. JMIR Publications 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9350816/ /pubmed/35857379 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34549 Text en ©Thomas Clavier, Emilie Occhiali, Claire Guenet, Naurine Vannier, Camille Hache, Vincent Compere, Jean Selim, Emmanuel Besnier. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 20.07.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://periop.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Clavier, Thomas
Occhiali, Emilie
Guenet, Claire
Vannier, Naurine
Hache, Camille
Compere, Vincent
Selim, Jean
Besnier, Emmanuel
Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study
title Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study
title_full Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study
title_fullStr Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study
title_short Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study
title_sort worldwide presence of national anesthesia societies on four major social networks in 2021: observational case study
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35857379
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34549
work_keys_str_mv AT clavierthomas worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy
AT occhialiemilie worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy
AT guenetclaire worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy
AT vanniernaurine worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy
AT hachecamille worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy
AT comperevincent worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy
AT selimjean worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy
AT besnieremmanuel worldwidepresenceofnationalanesthesiasocietiesonfourmajorsocialnetworksin2021observationalcasestudy